Hi,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 08:01:45AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> > allow-hotplug ens192
> > iface ens192 inet static
> > address 192.168.4.12
> > mask 255.255.252.0
>
> Spell this netmask instead.
Spell it
address 192.168.4.12/22
(with no "netmask" line at all)
That was it, thanks everyone.
On 25/09/2024 13:39, Erwan David wrote:
It should be "netmask 255.255.252.0" or (I prefer) just set
"address 192.168.4.12/22"
without netmask (man says it is deprecated)
Le 25/09/2024 à 12:30, Adam Weremczuk a écrit :
On 24/09/2024 22:29, Dan Ritter wrote:
What does
ip route show
give you on the VM in question?
ip route show
default via 192.168.4.1 dev ens192 onlink
192.168.4.0/24 dev ens192 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.4.12
BINGO!
192.168.4.0/24 i
Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> On 24/09/2024 22:29, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > What does
> >
> > ip route show
> >
> > give you on the VM in question?
>
> ip route show
> default via 192.168.4.1 dev ens192 onlink
> 192.168.4.0/24 dev ens192 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.4.12
>
> BINGO!
>
> 192.1
On 24/09/2024 22:29, Dan Ritter wrote:
What does
ip route show
give you on the VM in question?
ip route show
default via 192.168.4.1 dev ens192 onlink
192.168.4.0/24 dev ens192 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.4.12
BINGO!
192.168.4.0/24 is wrong, should say 192.168.4.0/22
Do you know w
5.x (a subset of Ethernet LAN).
To me this smells like a subnet mask length issue.
Triple-check that `ip a sh` shows the IP address and subnet mask that
you expect.
--
Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se
“Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”
Adam,
I doubt this is your issue. But there has been times when my VM's [virtual] MAC
address is the same as another in the network.
You have not mentioned about firewalls? Have you installed and configured any
firewalls?
>From your VM can you ping and/or connect to a computer in the 192.168.
Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just launched a Debian 12 VM in VMware (ESXi 7.0.2) and installed
> apache2 / php / postgres stack on it + ssh access.
>
> Generally we have 3 subnets (IPv4 only):
>
> - 192.168.4.0/22 (Ethernet LAN) - which starts with 192.168.4.1 and ends
> with 192.16
Hi all,
I've just launched a Debian 12 VM in VMware (ESXi 7.0.2) and installed
apache2 / php / postgres stack on it + ssh access.
Generally we have 3 subnets (IPv4 only):
- 192.168.4.0/22 (Ethernet LAN) - which starts with 192.168.4.1 and ends
with 192.168.7.254
- 10.10.10.0/24 (VPN1)
- 1
hypervisor and purchased
> > > failover public IPv4 IPs routed to that server.
> > >
> > Of course not! Some host _on_your_subnet_ must be responsible for
> > forwarding the packages. And a route has to be set so your machine knows
> > where to send the packages bey
On 10/31/23 16:46, Dan Ritter wrote:
Mihamina RKTMB wrote:
On 10/31/23 01:18, Dan Ritter wrote:
Mihamina RKTMB wrote:
But isn't there a way to make the Debian installer accept that the gateway
is not in the subnet of the set IP address?
No.
[OVH docs reference omitted]
You as
Hi.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Marco M. wrote:
> > Maybe you need to help the installer along, and set the default route
> > for the machine? Perhaps using an alternate virtual terminal, like
> > FN+F5. I believe the command is `route add default gw {IP-ADDRESS}
> > {INTERFA
Mihamina RKTMB wrote:
>
> On 10/31/23 01:18, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Mihamina RKTMB wrote:
> > > But isn't there a way to make the Debian installer accept that the gateway
> > > is not in the subnet of the set IP address?
> > No.
[OVH docs reference om
responsible for
forwarding the packages. And a route has to be set so your machine knows
where to send the packages beyond your local subnet to. That is the
gateway. It is just a shortcut to define the default route.
What you describe is what happens on home or office network. On
datacenter networks
addr add $IP/32 dev eth0"
- set the traffic to the gateway to go through the NIC: "ip route add $GW
dev eth0"
- set the default route to go via the gateway: "ip route add default via
$GW"
As I set the IP address to a /32, the gateway is not (never) in the subnet
of
e
same subnet.
Although, the router also needs that route.
ng the packages. And a route has to be set so your machine knows
where to send the packages beyond your local subnet to. That is the
gateway. It is just a shortcut to define the default route.
So the installer is right.
-H
--
Henning Follmann | hfollm...@itcfollmann.com
Am 30.10.2023 um 18:07:20 Uhr schrieb Jeffrey Walton:
> It should not matter, if I recall correctly. Anything the machine does
> not know how to route goes out on the default interface. That should
> be the 0.0.0.0 entry in the routing table.
Although, that entry must be there and the via IP must
t;ip addr add $IP/32 dev eth0"
>
> - set the traffic to the gateway to go through the NIC: "ip route add $GW
> dev eth0"
>
> - set the default route to go via the gateway: "ip route add default via
> $GW"
>
> As I set the IP address to a /32, th
to /32: "ip addr add $IP/32 dev eth0"
>
> - set the traffic to the gateway to go through the NIC: "ip route add
> $GW dev eth0"
>
> - set the default route to go via the gateway: "ip route add default via
> $GW"
>
> As I set the IP address to a /3
eway to go through the NIC: "ip route add
$GW dev eth0"
- set the default route to go via the gateway: "ip route add default via
$GW"
As I set the IP address to a /32, the gateway is not (never) in the
subnet of the VM.
When using the Debian installer, at the networking
Hi.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 04:37:19PM +0100, Tuxo wrote:
> Can I configure dhclient on my router to discard lease offers from a certain
> subnet? I could also try to match the lease time, the 192.168.100/24 lease
> time
> is only several seconds (!!) short, the real one wil
does contain the WAN subnet and a lease time of 4 hours.
Can I configure dhclient on my router to discard lease offers from a
certain subnet? I could also try to match the lease time, the
192.168.100/24 lease time is only several seconds (!!) short, the real
one will be 4 hours or more and come
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:39:03AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 03:20:33PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > What the "session" (actually the terminal) is doing when you hit ^C is
> > to send a signal (typically number 2, SIGI
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 03:20:33PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> What the "session" (actually the terminal) is doing when you hit ^C is
> to send a signal (typically number 2, SIGINT) to the running process.
SIGINT is sent to all the foreground processes, not just one. This
becomes important w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:54:17AM +0100, Ron Leach wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 18:03, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> >Once you're ready to deploy it, you would want to set it up as an
> >automatically respawning service, under systemd or one of the other
> >se
On 06/06/2017 18:03, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Once you're ready to deploy it, you would want to set it up as an
automatically respawning service, under systemd or one of the other
service managers.
I seem to be having a problem stopping socat under Wheezy LTS using
/etc/init.d. I've created a s
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:39:19PM +0100, Ron Leach wrote:
> 2. socat did not 'detach' from the keyboard session, so the screen
> remained with a blank line and no shell prompt. [This means that if I
> invoke a solution this way, I will have to have a session running all
> the time that I want
s (options -d -d -d), including the 'connection' open and close,
and the traffic sequences.
For tests, I used telnet on a source machine on this subnet, and socat
on a proxy server to reach an smtp server we have at another site; I
only passed the
EHLO,
HELP, and
QUIT
commands,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:29:06AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:49:35PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Corporate firewalls and their priests tend to believe in Numerology,
[...]
> > Anyway, on my laptop "lap
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:59:30AM +0100, Ron Leach wrote:
> On 05/06/2017 14:08, Henning wrote:
> >
> >socat
> >
>
> Henning, thank you for that. socat seems a very flexible package.
>
> Have you used it yourself, at all? I couldn't see from the documentation
Yes I connect a serial port over
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:49:35PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:59:30AM +0100, Ron Leach wrote:
> > On 05/06/2017 14:08, Henning wrote:
> > >
> > >socat
> > >
> >
> > Henning, thank you for that. socat seems a very flexible package.
> >
> > Have you used it yoursel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:59:30AM +0100, Ron Leach wrote:
> On 05/06/2017 14:08, Henning wrote:
> >
> >socat
> >
>
> Henning, thank you for that. socat seems a very flexible package.
>
> Have you used it yourself, at all? I couldn't see from the
>
On 05/06/2017 14:08, Henning wrote:
socat
Henning, thank you for that. socat seems a very flexible package.
Have you used it yourself, at all? I couldn't see from the
documentation how to terminate socat. I was planning to use a
variation of one of their examples, like this:
socat -d
> On Jun 5, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Ron Leach wrote:
>
>
> I'm looking for a way to provide a tcp proxy
socat
-H
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:37:48PM +0100, Ron Leach wrote:
List, good morning,
I'm looking for a way to provide a tcp proxy, which can run as a
service on a Wheezy-LTS host, for a single (higher-order) port. I
have looked at two packages, but neither is quite suitable.
Depending on the prot
with failover, but suffers from a flaw(?)
which means that it does not accept incoming IPv4 traffic from another
machine on its local subnet
( https://sourceforge.net/p/balance/bugs/9/ ); it does work when
accepting connections from localhost, as per the work-around in that
report. But in our cas
23 PM, Marc Auslander wrote:
> Dan Hitt writes:
>
>> What is the preferred way to determine the subnet mask of your box
>> using /bin/ip on debian 9.0 (stretch)?
>>
>> In the old days, this sort of information would come out of ifconfig,
>> but it looks like de
Dan Hitt writes:
> What is the preferred way to determine the subnet mask of your box
> using /bin/ip on debian 9.0 (stretch)?
>
> In the old days, this sort of information would come out of ifconfig,
> but it looks like debian really wants to get away from ifconfig, and i
>
What is the preferred way to determine the subnet mask of your box
using /bin/ip on debian 9.0 (stretch)?
In the old days, this sort of information would come out of ifconfig,
but it looks like debian really wants to get away from ifconfig, and i
think use ip as a sort of replacement.
So i would
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> (you can't assume that eth0 talks to 192.168.1.0/24 and eth1 talks
> to 192.168.2.0/24, for example). It's not impossible, but needs a
> bit more care.
ebtables could enforce that but I agree it is much more hassle than
physic
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
I all
I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24
I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in same network.
So, client1 can go to 192.168.1.0/24 but can't see other clients in
192.168.2.0/24. An
Hi Pol,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24
>
> I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in same network.
>
> So, client1 can go to 192.168.1.0/24 but can't see other clients in
> 192.168
On Mon 18 Jul 2016 at 16:37:25 (-0300), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> > This looks to be impossible. The whole idea of having 1 network
> > segment is that members can communicate directly over layer 2 without
> > ant router/firewall in between.
>
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> This looks to be impossible. The whole idea of having 1 network
> segment is that members can communicate directly over layer 2 without
> ant router/firewall in between.
Actually, it is very much possible, but it needs cooperation from the
network equipm
On Monday, July 18, 2016 10:11:24 AM Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> > I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24
>
> Ok, 2 different network segment and something between that might stop
> unwanted communication
>
> > I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in sam
Hi,
> I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24
Ok, 2 different network segment and something between that might stop unwanted
communication
> I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in same network.
>
> So, client1 can go to 192.168.1.0/24 but can't se
I all
I've a network 192.168.2.0/24 connected by routing to 192.168.1.0/24
I'd like blocks clients on 192.168.2.0/24 between then in same network.
So, client1 can go to 192.168.1.0/24 but can't see other clients in
192.168.2.0/24. And so for all clients.
Any idea?
thanks!
Pol
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:14 PM, francis picabia wrote:
> We have a subnet running our legacy and primary DNS server
> where it remains as the last system on that subnet.
> Many things are pointing to that IP in resolv.conf, etc.,
>
> We want to put the DNS server on the new subnet
We have a subnet running our legacy and primary DNS server
where it remains as the last system on that subnet.
Many things are pointing to that IP in resolv.conf, etc.,
We want to put the DNS server on the new subnet with all
the other systems, to simply configuration on the
new Fortinet firewall
Thanks Pascal!
Thats it.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ml ml a écrit :
>>
>> i set up a DHCP Server. Here are my installed packages:
>> --
>> ii dhcp3-server 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
>> ISC DHCP server (
Hello,
ml ml a écrit :
>
> i set up a DHCP Server. Here are my installed packages:
> --
> ii dhcp3-server 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
> ISC DHCP server (transitional package)
> ii isc-dhcp-server 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
> ISC DH
used by all the isc-dhcp* packages
ii isc-dhcp-server 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
ISC DHCP server for automatic IP address assignment
I am getting this error:
--
dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 192.168.99.111 via eth0: not authoritative for
subnet 192.168.99.0
David Baron wrote:
> dhcpd complains about lack of subnet declaration.
> 1. What would use?
> 2. Do I need it?
> 3. Do I need dhcpd (it fails to start and this effect nothing)?
man dhcpd ==> 'Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Server'.
The key word here is "Serve
I have no subnet declared anywhere (that I know of). I have eth0 to a router
on 10.100.101.100
dhcpd complains about lack of subnet declaration.
1. What would use?
2. Do I need it?
3. Do I need dhcpd (it fails to start and this effect nothing)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
ernet Address Physical Address Type
> 159.226.135.129 00-0b-fd-50-52-80 dynamic
>
>
>
Try what Alex Samad specified in his email, it should work, even if your
default gw is on a different subnet it's on the same physical network as
you, your windows box send
On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 19:05, trace.localh...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
> Show us your arp table too
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>arp -a
Interface: 210.73.34.32 --- 0x2
Internet Address Physical Address Type
159.226.135.129 00-0b-fd-50-52-80 dynamic
--
hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 18:12, a...@samad.com.au wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> do you have a vpn up it looks like a point to point setup very strange.
>>
>
> To be frankly, I cann't see the infrastructure of this network
> considering that I'm not the
On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 18:12, a...@samad.com.au wrote:
[snip]
> do you have a vpn up it looks like a point to point setup very strange.
To be frankly, I cann't see the infrastructure of this network
considering that I'm not the network admin of my institute.
I post my issue here
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:02:05PM +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 17:54, da...@ceu.ox.ac.uk wrote:
> > On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 17:40 +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
>
[snip]
> > specified somewhere.
>
> > What does "route print" give you from Win XP?
On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 17:54, da...@ceu.ox.ac.uk wrote:
> On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 17:40 +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > Can you run a traceroute and reply back with the results?
>>
>> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert www.google.cn
>>
>> Tracing route to google.c
On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 17:40 +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Can you run a traceroute and reply back with the results?
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert www.google.cn
>
> Tracing route to google.cn [203.208.33.100]
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>
> 1<1 ms<
gyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>>> -
>>>> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
>>>> Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>>>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.3
dress. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
>>> Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
>>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
>>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
. . . . . . . . : No
>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.129
>> DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.10
>>
On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 12:41 +0800, hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> -
> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
> Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
>
On Thu,02.Apr.09, 15:25:46, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> This is _NOT_ my case. I mean, in my case, the IP and Gateway are not
> on the same subnet. In this case, I must also add some route in order
> to send the packet from my host the Gateway first but I don't know how
> to d
e
>interfaces file.
This is _NOT_ my case. I mean, in my case, the IP and Gateway are not
on the same subnet. In this case, I must also add some route in order
to send the packet from my host the Gateway first but I don't know how
to do it.
--
.: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com
owing
>> ip configurations:
>>
>> -
>> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
>> Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.
Hi,
You simply need to edit the file: /etc/network/interfaces
Although, from the IP address you provided i'm not sure how it can reach
your gateway, coz looking at it, seems like IP and Gateway are not on
the same subnet.
Regards,
Ron
hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'
FC-2E-2B-6C
> Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.129
> DNS Serve
: No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.129
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.10
129.22
34.32
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.129
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.10
129.226.8.7
-
Now, I switched from wind
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:42:58PM +0100, itom wrote:
> hi all, with iptables I've create
> this script(see below or here http://pastebin.com/m416d8f6d)
> for this specific situation:
> http://img33.picoodle.com/img/img33/3/1/1/f_lanm_1233f0a.jpg
>
> In the eth2 lan work as I wish because pc can ac
hi all, with iptables I've create
this script(see below or here http://pastebin.com/m416d8f6d)
for this specific situation:
http://img33.picoodle.com/img/img33/3/1/1/f_lanm_1233f0a.jpg
In the eth2 lan work as I wish because pc can access to internet only
with proxy at port 8080; the problem also
Adam Dobrin on 20/07/05 15:00, wrote:
I'm having trouble using backuppc from a separate subnet. I have a VPN
connection from an offiste location to my network; and while the remote
machine *can* ping into the internal network, and perl's gethostbyname
functions fine; bpc is still r
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:00, Adam Dobrin wrote:
> I'm having trouble using backuppc from a separate subnet. I have a VPN
> connection from an offiste location to my network; and while the remote
> machine *can* ping into the internal network, and perl's gethostbyname
>
I'm having trouble using backuppc from a separate subnet. I have a VPN
connection from an offiste location to my network; and while the remote
machine *can* ping into the internal network, and perl's gethostbyname
functions fine; bpc is still returning a 'no ping'
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 11:57, Joost De Cock shoved this in my mailbox:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a problem when connecting to an LDAP server that I can't explain.
OK, sorry about this, but it seems I misconfigured my subnet mask, and that's
why it didn't work.
I'll
Hello list,
I have a problem when connecting to an LDAP server that I can't explain.
My client (an apache webserver running woody) and 2 ldap servers (A and B) are
located on network 1.
A third LDAP server (C) is located on another network, that is connected with
a firewall. Connectivity to th
t-
Von: Harland Christofferson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. März 2004 20:11
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: subnet seen on intranet
i have a network i use for code development branching off of
the corporate intranet. the t
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:11:21PM -0500, Harland Christofferson wrote:
> i have a network i use for code development branching off of
> the corporate intranet. the topology is:
>
> +---+ +-+
> | 192.168.1.100 |---| 192.168.1.1 |
> +-
i have a network i use for code development branching off of
the corporate intranet. the topology is:
+---+ +-+
| 192.168.1.100 |---| 192.168.1.1 |
+---+ | 10.20.0.0 |
engineering3a | 10.20.1.158 |--- to/from int
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:29:57AM -0500, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> I ended up doing this:
>
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
> address 192.168.0.1
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> #
> up /sbin/ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 2001:470:1F00:465::1/64
> up /sbin/route -A inet6 a
> kolisko
>
> On ?t, 2003-02-27 at 02:23, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> >
> >
> > I got a /64 from tunnelbroker.net and the tunnel is up and running
> > happily. I'm trying now to get my /64 subnet on the backend up and
> > running. They gave me:
> >
man interfaces
section: INET6 ADDRESS FAMILY
kolisko
On Čt, 2003-02-27 at 02:23, Robert L. Harris wrote:
>
>
> I got a /64 from tunnelbroker.net and the tunnel is up and running
> happily. I'm trying now to get my /64 subnet on the backend up and
> running. They gave me
I got a /64 from tunnelbroker.net and the tunnel is up and running
happily. I'm trying now to get my /64 subnet on the backend up and
running. They gave me:
2001:470:1F00:465::/64
I've got 2001:470:1f00:::2db on my firewall's external eth0 right
now. I'm thinking a
7;re setting them
correctly, so I'm not going to comment on them. My interpretation would
be a pure guess, so I'll not confuse the issue further.
Generally speaking, I believe what you're looking for is commonly
referred to as the "network number". The basic idea is that yo
I am setting up a machine behind a cisco router to exist as a standalone
machine in a DMZ. I'm using the Ziegler book "Linux Firewalls", but I'm
having trouble knowing what is meant by 'subnet_base' here, in the
header setting of the iptables script for a standalone host.
Example:
IPADDR="63.144.
network. I have but subnet declarations for the first two networks, but
> haven't for the third. DHCPD refuses to run and i get the following in the
> daemon.log file:
When the daemon is started you need to pass it the interfaces to run on and
only those interfaces. If it is not servin
hi
My machine has three network cards in it each attached to a different
network. I am trying to use dhcpd to provide ip addresses to machines on two
of the networks but don't want it to provide ip addresses to the third
network. I have but subnet declarations for the first two networks
I have sendmail on my gateway box which has a dynamic IP. How
do I make it so it will allow the internal hosts which are
on a 192.168.1.x subnet use it as their smtp server?
brian
--
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/
Thus spake Shandar Ahmad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I have my Debian server with two NIC's, one on the
> internet and the other on the local subnet
> (ip's:202.184.x.y and 10.0.0.100). There are other
> debian boxes on the local subnet. Now I want that any
> http requ
I have my Debian server with two NIC's, one on the
internet and the other on the local subnet
(ip's:202.184.x.y and 10.0.0.100). There are other
debian boxes on the local subnet. Now I want that any
http request submitted via eth0 be automatically
directed to my other local box (at 1
iller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 1:16 PM
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: RFC 1878 documents for subnet
>
>
>On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:41:21PM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote:
>> Where to got RFC 1878 documents for subnet mask
>> and the
they should be on the IETF site ... I'm guessing www.ietf.org
A
-Original Message-
From: Eric G . Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 1:16 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFC 1878 documents for subnet
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:41:21PM
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:41:21PM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote:
> Where to got RFC 1878 documents for subnet mask
> and the valid addresses.
debian has a doc-rfc package containing many of these. If you don't
want the whole package (it's pretty big) just do a net search on the
R
Where to got RFC 1878 documents for subnet mask
and the valid addresses.
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Ian Stuart wrote:
> I'm using a i386 portable with 2.0.34 installed. I have a requirement to
> plug this machine into various subnets, depending on where I'm working
> within my organisation.
>
> Is there a way to configure the system so that I can use
> (a) 4 or 5 different
only work within the same subnet, and has to be
re-initialised at each bootup.
many thanks...
** Ian Stuart
Land Rover : A British car that was meant to survive the charge of an
adult bull rhino and be field-stripped in the jungle with essentially
a screw-driver and a cresc
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
