Bottenberg, Michael (12023-03-10):
> > Of course not. [...]
> Quite the contrary.
Indeed, this bit is backward in my mail. Sorry.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On 2023-03-09 22:16 Nicolas George wrote:
rhkra...@gmail.com (12023-03-08):
* can files in the LUKS partition other than the one with the one
block
corrupted be read correctly?
* assuming the file with the corrupted block is bigger than one
block, can
the other parts of the file (not in
On Friday, March 10, 2023 02:54:39 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com (12023-03-09):
> > Didn't you mean "of course"?
>
> I meant the rest of the paragraph and the ones after that.
Ahh, ok.
rhkra...@gmail.com (12023-03-09):
> Didn't you mean "of course"?
I meant the rest of the paragraph and the ones after that.
> If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again
Please apply good mail hygiene to what you send yourself. Signatures are
max four lines.
--
Nicolas George
On Thursday, March 09, 2023 04:16:14 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com (12023-03-08):
> > The question: Suppose disk corruption corrupts one block in the data
> > storage area of a LUKS partition / filesystem (I'm not asking about
> > corruption in the headers or some other area of "me
On Thursday, March 09, 2023 04:03:20 PM David Christensen wrote:
> I believe I changed a byte somewhere in the middle of file blocks on
> disk using dd(1) and then I saw a bad byte somewhere in the middle of
> the file with less(1).
>
>
> I suggest that you repeat the experiment. Just going thro
rhkra...@gmail.com (12023-03-08):
> The question: Suppose disk corruption corrupts one block in the data storage
> area of a LUKS partition / filesystem (I'm not asking about corruption in the
> headers or some other area of "metadata"). In the case of one block of
> corruption in the data sto
On 3/9/23 06:53, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all who replied -- two clarifications requested below:
On Wednesday, March 08, 2023 09:45:33 PM David Christensen wrote:
...
A few years ago, I did a "bit rot" experiment.
Thanks for doing that experiment!
...
I wiped a disk, applied
a p
Thanks to all who replied -- two clarifications requested below:
On Wednesday, March 08, 2023 09:45:33 PM David Christensen wrote:
...
> A few years ago, I did a "bit rot" experiment.
Thanks for doing that experiment!
...
> I wiped a disk, applied
> a partitioning scheme, created a partition,
On 3/8/23 07:20, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious about the integrity of LUKS (that is, the ability to preserve
data in the event of corruption on the disk or such).
Aside: I know that backups are a solution / requirement (and I have some
(well, one, atm)), and I know that there is the abi
to...@tuxteam.de writes:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:20:09AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am curious about the integrity of LUKS (that is, the ability to preserve
> data in the event of corruption on the disk or such).
[...]
>* can files in the LUKS partition other than the one wi
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:20:09AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am curious about the integrity of LUKS (that is, the ability to preserve
> data in the event of corruption on the disk or such).
>
> Aside: I know that backups are a solution / requirement (and I have some
> (well, one, atm)
I am curious about the integrity of LUKS (that is, the ability to preserve
data in the event of corruption on the disk or such).
Aside: I know that backups are a solution / requirement (and I have some
(well, one, atm)), and I know that there is the ability to backup (and
restore) the LUKS head
13 matches
Mail list logo
