Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I'm asking here is, what open source friendly streaming audio
> > protocols are the best one's out there and why? I would like to
> > give this guy an intelligent answer.
> >
>
> A little
; > >
> > > > Believe it or not I actually have an on topic discussion I'd
> like to
> > > > start ;)
> > > >
> > > > I contacted one of the Spokane, WA radio stations because I
> could
> > > not
> > > > lis
e, WA radio stations because I could
> not
> > listen to their streaming audio and received a response asking what
> I
> > would recommend as the person was very unhappy with what he was
> > currently using.
> >
> > What I'm asking here is, what open sourc
tacted one of the Spokane, WA radio stations because I could not
> > listen to their streaming audio and received a response asking what I
> > would recommend as the person was very unhappy with what he was
> > currently using.
>
> I live in Spokane and I spend advertising do
on I'd like to> > start ;)> > > > I
> > contacted one of the Spokane, WA radio stations because I could not> >
> > listen to their streaming audio and received a response asking what I> >
> > would recommend as the person was very unhappy with
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:15:36AM -0800, Gary Koskenmaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Believe it or not I actually have an on topic discussion I'd like to
> start ;)
>
> I contacted one of the Spokane, WA radio stations because I could not
> listen to their streaming aud
Hi all,
Believe it or not I actually have an on topic discussion I'd like to
start ;)
I contacted one of the Spokane, WA radio stations because I could not
listen to their streaming audio and received a response asking what I
would recommend as the person was very unhappy with what h
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:29:11 -0500, Michael Satterwhite
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Don't expect the situation to change soon, this is the microsoft old
> > tactic to lock-in users...
>
> And they are *SO* good at it. :(
>
> We are near the point that we can get people away from Wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 17 September 2004 14:21, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> > Like it or not, if we want to get people to consider using an OS other
> > than Windows, it's going to have to be possible for them to use tools
> > that are compatible with what they're u
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:02:43 -0500, Michael Satterwhite
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 17 September 2004 12:25, Silvan wrote:
> > > A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 17 September 2004 12:25, Silvan wrote:
> > A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for
> > their streams. How can these be listened to (live) from Linux. Surely
> > *SOMEONE* has solved this.
&
> A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for
> their streams. How can these be listened to (live) from Linux. Surely
> *SOMEONE* has solved this.
We have lots of things to try, but in my experience Windows media stuff is a
lost cause. If it isn't Real
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:07:44 -0500, Michael Satterwhite
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for their
> streams. How can these be listened to (live) from Linux.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A lot of websites with streaming audio use the Windows Media Format for their
streams. How can these be listened to (live) from Linux. Surely *SOMEONE* has
solved this.
tia
- ---Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux
I have a client that among other things is about to start a Web-based
Talk audio show. His early needs would be to Stream the audio from the
webserver. Has anyone had experience in this area? I would love some
advice on software plus hardware.
My first thoughts would be to use icecast on the web
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:46:24AM +0100, Mark C wrote:
>
> Once upon a time Bijan Soleymani was quoted as saying:
>
> > What happens if you open xmms, press Control-L to open a location and
> > then paste in the URL.
>
> If I save the pls file from mozilla, then open it with xmms it works, but
Once upon a time Bijan Soleymani was quoted as saying:
> What happens if you open xmms, press Control-L to open a location and
> then paste in the URL.
If I save the pls file from mozilla, then open it with xmms it works, but
I want to be able to do this via mozilla, and this seems impossable, a
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:15:15AM +0100, Mark C wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 01:02, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
>
> > What happens if you open xmms, press Control-L to open a location and
> > then paste in the URL.
>
> nothing, it doesn't even show up after I press ok,
> I have been going into the
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:43:26AM +0100, Mark C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my quest to try to get streaming audio playing from shoutcast and
> mozilla, I have been unable to get xmms to play any *.pls files or any
> URL's, When I click on the url tab and enter a url, it doesn't
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 01:02, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> What happens if you open xmms, press Control-L to open a location and
> then paste in the URL.
nothing, it doesn't even show up after I press ok,
I have been going into the playlist window and then pressing the URL
button and doing it that way
Hi,
In my quest to try to get streaming audio playing from shoutcast and
mozilla, I have been unable to get xmms to play any *.pls files or any
URL's, When I click on the url tab and enter a url, it doesn't even
attempt to try to play them, I've tried xmms from woody, testing and n
I'd like to use XMMS to play streaming audio from the net.
When I press and type in a URL, I very briefly get a message about buffering
in the title area; this is replaced by the URL.
But no sound.
On other occasions I don't even get the "buffering" message. Nothing.
interfaces.
It remains to be seen how effective these are.
Best regards,
> This may well be a bit off-topic, but how do I block users on the LAN from
> accessing streaming audio and/or video data from the Internet and filling
> up the Internet line?
>
> I'm running Debian GNU-Lin
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 03:58:17PM +0300, George Karaolides wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| This may well be a bit off-topic, but how do I block users on the LAN from
| accessing streaming audio and/or video data from the Internet and filling
| up the Internet line?
The easiest way would be to simply block
Hi,
This may well be a bit off-topic, but how do I block users on the LAN from
accessing streaming audio and/or video data from the Internet and filling
up the Internet line?
I'm running Debian GNU-Linux 2.2r3 (potato) on the gateway.
I use the ipmasq Debian package to set up masqueradin
On 10 Dec 1999, Colin Marquardt wrote:
: * Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: [gogo]
: > You use the -b switch to specify the minimum bitrate, or the VBR code
: > might get too agressive during "easy" portions of the WAV file.
:
: Where did you find that info?
I read the doc
* Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[gogo]
> You use the -b switch to specify the minimum bitrate, or the VBR code
> might get too agressive during "easy" portions of the WAV file.
Where did you find that info?
> I use -v -b 112 as suggested in the docs, works well here.
Hmm, the docs
On 8 Dec 1999, Colin Marquardt wrote:
: * Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > The fastest LAME-spinoff I know is href="http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~shigeo/soft/gogo2/";> GOGO ,
: > that is optimized by using 3DNow, MMX and ISSE assembler. About 4 times
: > faster than LAME
* Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The fastest LAME-spinoff I know is href="http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~shigeo/soft/gogo2/";> GOGO ,
> that is optimized by using 3DNow, MMX and ISSE assembler. About 4 times
> faster than LAME at the same quality.
Why does it say I should combin
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> aphro hat gesagt: // aphro wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, byoung wrote:
> >
> > b- >i tried to get the LAME, but wasn't able to. i'll try that again.
> >
> > its a good player, and check into not-lame its a breakoff(?) of lame,
> > and has a differen
aphro hat gesagt: // aphro wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, byoung wrote:
>
> b- >i tried to get the LAME, but wasn't able to. i'll try that again.
>
> its a good player, and check into not-lame its a breakoff(?) of lame,
> and has a different homepage, although the lame page links to it.
The fastest
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, byoung wrote:
b- >i tried to get the LAME, but wasn't able to. i'll try that again.
its a good player, and check into not-lame its a breakoff(?) of lame, and
has a different homepage, although the lame page links to it.
b- >btw, to provide streaming audio
thanx for the pointers.
i tried to get the LAME, but wasn't able to. i'll try that again.
btw, to provide streaming audio (i.e., realaudio, unless there is
something else that is easily accessbible by general public), is there an
alternative to the tools sold by realaudio? i s
33 matches
Mail list logo
