Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-18 Thread Jason R . Mastaler
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I won't email someone who uses TMDA. If they really want my mail > then they'll accept it. :-) The TMDA user might say the opposite -- if your message is important, surely you'll take the time to reply to a confirmation request. It's only a one-time, 2-key seq

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-16 Thread Andy Saxena
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:59:11PM -0500, dman wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 12:33:00AM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote: > | On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:24:18PM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > | > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Andy Saxena wrote: > | > > | > > Just curious, but does anybody have any thought

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-15 Thread dman
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 12:33:00AM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote: | On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:24:18PM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: | > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Andy Saxena wrote: | > | > > Just curious, but does anybody have any thoughts on TMDA? | > | > What exactly is TMDA? | | Tagged Mail Deliv

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-15 Thread Andy Saxena
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:24:18PM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Andy Saxena wrote: > > > Just curious, but does anybody have any thoughts on TMDA? > > What exactly is TMDA? > > - -- > Baloo > Tagged Mail Deliver

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-15 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 May 2002, Andy Saxena wrote: > Just curious, but does anybody have any thoughts on TMDA? What exactly is TMDA? - -- Baloo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE84yZmNtWkM9Ny9xURAgh2AJ0cG5VGB2u41kFWXuGf

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-15 Thread David Z Maze
Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just curious, but does anybody have any thoughts on TMDA? There was a thread on it on gnu.emacs.gnus not too far back (look on http://groups.google.com for it). There are people who swear by it; arguments against it are (a) it's rude to force people to a

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-15 Thread Andy Saxena
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 12:04:50AM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > On Sun, 12 May 2002, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > The last two RBLs in my config don't list anything but every IP > > > address assigned to Korea, and the other every IP assigned to China, > > > since it doesn't appear any a

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-13 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > The last two RBLs in my config don't list anything but every IP > > address assigned to Korea, and the other every IP assigned to China, > > since it doesn't appear any admins in either country have a clue. > > What might these RBLs be? Gah...I hate

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-13 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, May 09, 2002, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The last two RBLs in my config don't list anything but every IP > address assigned to Korea, and the other every IP assigned to China, > since it doesn't appear any admins in either country have a clue. What might these RBL

Re: Stopping spam

2002-05-09 Thread John Conover
If anyone wants: http://www.johncon.com/john/StochasticUCEDetection/ is a reasonably good spam mechanism. Its tightly integrated with procmail, very configurable, and has the C sources for the database system that runs it. It will never reject an e-mail on any one thing, (like an RBL,) but re

Stopping spam

2002-05-09 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Glen Lee Edwards wrote: > I'll look into it. I need some way to kill the spam that goes through my > servers. Yesterday I received an email from Brazil. I'm not real sure what > it > said, but it looked official, made several references to "spam," and quoted at > the bottom