On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:55:24AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
you're posting without a Realname and your lines are too long. Please
fix this.
> I need staroffice 5.1 german version, but I can't find it at Sun's pages
> anymore, and 5.2 is way to big for my harddr
I need staroffice 5.1 german version, but I can't find it at Sun's pages
anymore, and 5.2 is way to big for my harddrive. Does anyone know where I can
find it?
Get your own FREE E-mail address at http://www.linuxfreemail.com
Linux FREE Mail is 100% FREE, 100% Linux, and 100% yours!
On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 02:52:35PM +0100, John Stevenson wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to install StarOffice 5.1 from the official sun
> CD onto a debian potato system. However when I try the set
> up program from inside the /cdrom/linux/office51 directory,
> I get the
ific version installed, which I beleve is older
> than the current version in potato.
>
> I dont fancy messing around with libraries so I guess I will just bin star
> office until someone comes up with an installer.
>
> Johnny.
>
> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>
&g
version installed, which I beleve is older
than the current version in potato.
I dont fancy messing around with libraries so I guess I will just bin star
office until someone comes up with an installer.
Johnny.
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > I am trying to install StarOffice 5.1 from the offici
> I am trying to install StarOffice 5.1 from the official sun
> CD onto a debian potato system. However when I try the set
> up program from inside the /cdrom/linux/office51 directory,
> I get the following error:
>
> # ./setup
> bash: ./setup: Permission denied
>
Hello,
I am trying to install StarOffice 5.1 from the official sun
CD onto a debian potato system. However when I try the set
up program from inside the /cdrom/linux/office51 directory,
I get the following error:
# ./setup
bash: ./setup: Permission denied
I have tried this both as root and as
I am trying to use StarBase to manage a very large database. From what I
have read on their web site it should handle pretty much any size db. It
seems to cease loading the db at 32000 lines. The db is about 3 times
that size. I am able to manage the db with Lotus Approach, so I figured
StarBase wo
ECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having a problem when attempting to install StarOffice 5.1 on my potato
> system and am hoping that one of you may know the solution. I have posted a
> support request to
> nntp://starnews.sun.com/staroffice.com.support.install.linux/
> without a
Ian is experiencing a similar problem when attempting the /net install. He
successfully
completes the network install using the /net argument. When attempting to do
a user installation using /bin/setup, the same problem occurs where
the installation script hangs upon clicking 'Complete'. Looking a
Well, this might not help with the setup hanging, but you should
probably install with the \net (or is that /net) flag, if your
installing as root. There should be a README about this.
Hello,
I am having a problem when attempting to install StarOffice 5.1 on my potato
system and am hoping that one of you may know the solution. I have posted a
support request to nntp://starnews.sun.com/staroffice.com.support.install.linux/
without a response (so far). Another Debian user, Ian
StarOffice 5.1 requires libc6 2.0.7, while potato currently uses 2.1.2 (this
seems to make SO malfunction). Is there any way to set libc6 2.0.7 for a
particular application (eg. using LD_LIBRARY_PATH, LD_PRELOAD, etc. and
installing libc6_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb in a specific dir, with dpkg -x)?
- Original Message -
From: Carl Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 1999 5:37 PM
Subject: StarOffice 5.1
> Has anyone installed StarOffice 5.1 (Personal addition) from CD? I
> need it to import MS Word 97 documents. I'm currently running ve
On 28-Aug-1999, Carl Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone installed StarOffice 5.1 (Personal addition) from CD? I
> need it to import MS Word 97 documents. I'm currently running version
> 4.0 under Debian 2.0 which is a bit slow on my 486 DX-2 (66MHz) 32 MB
>
Has anyone installed StarOffice 5.1 (Personal addition) from CD? I
need it to import MS Word 97 documents. I'm currently running version
4.0 under Debian 2.0 which is a bit slow on my 486 DX-2 (66MHz) 32 MB
system. But it does a decent job of importing Word 6 documents.
I'm guess
Dave Dash wrote:
>
> > Yes the last libc upgrade; it seems to of killed
> > Star Office 5.1 for me. :<
>
> Luckily I have old libc6 and libc6-dev debs (you might
> be able to dig them up in your
> /var/cache/apt/archives/ directory).
>
> I'll just keep these in a safe folder just in case
> this
> Yes the last libc upgrade; it seems to of killed
> Star Office 5.1 for me. :<
Luckily I have old libc6 and libc6-dev debs (you might
be able to dig them up in your
/var/cache/apt/archives/ directory).
I'll just keep these in a safe folder just in case
this happens again.
===
___
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 10:36:51PM -0700, Dave Dash wrote:
> I am running potato and during the last week Star
> Office fails to run and gives a segmentation fault.
> Anybody else get this?
>
>
> ===
>
> Dave Dash
> http://www.ftmax.com/
> ___
Dave Dash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running potato and during the last week Star
> Office fails to run and gives a segmentation fault.
> Anybody else get this?
>
>
> ===
>
> Dave Dash
> http://www.ftmax.com/
Yep. I got it to partially work, but not well, by doin
I am running potato and during the last week Star
Office fails to run and gives a segmentation fault.
Anybody else get this?
===
Dave Dash
http://www.ftmax.com/
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Free instant messaging and more a
gue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: John Leget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"debian-user@lists.debian.org"
> Subject: Re: Staroffice 5.1 under slink
> Resent-Date: 23 May 1999 13:35:30 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@
After breezing through the installation procedure (saying `y' to the glibc
2.0.7 warning -- I have 2.1.1), when I run `./soffice' or `./soffice.bin' I
get a segmentation fault.
Has anyone else seen this?
Mike
--
Mike Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you might want to look at lftp
Sean
Angus Claydon wrote:
> Excuse me hopping on here, but I liked the hamm version of ncftp in
> this regard. The beta version that comes with slink , ncftp3 if I
> remember correctly, doesn't handle resuming downloads as yet.
>
> Angus Claydon
>
> > Personally
Excuse me hopping on here, but I liked the hamm version of ncftp in
this regard. The beta version that comes with slink , ncftp3 if I
remember correctly, doesn't handle resuming downloads as yet.
Angus Claydon
> Personally I like lftp. It allows you to resume broken downloads among other
Hi,
I use "wget" for all downloads, i cut and paste urls into a text file as i come
across them
which in turn is set up to be read by wget when it starts.
I then start wget up in "ip-up.d" no problem, apart from being impatient
sometimes :)
wget is included with debian to >;0)
cheers
Shao Zha
Personally I like lftp. It allows you to resume broken downloads among other
nifty things.
Sean
Shao Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't understand why they don't split the one big tar into pieces.
> With the daily use of the telephone, it is nearly impossible for me
> to dow
On Sun, 23 May 1999, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Is there any programs similar to Go Right in linux?
Never heard of Go Right, but from the context i assume it's a program that
resumes a disconnected download?
wget can do this, and i'm sure many other programs can as well. According
to the manpage,
On Sun, 23 May 1999, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't understand why they don't split the one big tar into pieces.
> With the daily use of the telephone, it is nearly impossible for me
> to download the whole thing.
>
> Is there any programs similar to Go Right in linux?
Hi,
I don't understand why they don't split the one big tar into pieces.
With the daily use of the telephone, it is nearly impossible for me
to download the whole thing.
Is there any programs similar to Go Right in linux?
Thanks.
Shao.
On Sun, May 23, 199
Unfortunately it seems the tar file i downloaded is corrupt :(. The sum of
extracted
files is less than the originall tar file
cheers
Paul Harris wrote:
> i didn't have a single problem: i just downloaded the tarball again to be
> sure:
>
> download it, untar it. cd so51inst/office51
>
> ./set
only thing the rich are willing for the poor to call
| theirs, and keep.
|
On Thu, 20 May 1999, Brian Schramm wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 13:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Brian Schramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Christian Lavoie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-user@lists.de
hi,
yeah it works under slink fine... but i'm wondering if that is all they
changed... apart from some small user interface diffs in the configuration
section, nothing seems to have changed... i still see the little
annoyances from 5.0...
Paul
Thu, 20 May 1999, Bernard de Rubinat wrote:
> StarOffice 5.1 (just released) works with potato. When you install, it will
> complain that it does not find glibc 2.0.7, just ignore as you have glibc
> 2.1 (with potato).
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Bernard
On 20-May-99 Brian Schramm wrote:
> Anyone tryed it on Slink yet??
It ran well under Slink, but I broke my system when I reinstalled it under
potato and ran the libc6 script that came with it. Yes I know, I should not
have run that script. It was intended for glibc not glibc2.
--
Andrew
> >
>> > I'm at 75% -- woo hoo!
>> >
>> > Sean
>> >
>> > Pollywog wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 20-May-99 Bernard de Rubinat wrote:
>> > > > StarOffice 5.1 (just released) works with potato. When you install, it
> will
&g
> Where are you downloading is from. On www.stardivision.com the
> download area is closed.
> Sean wrote:
> > no it's not, I'm downloading SO5.1 right now . . .
> >
> > I'm at 75% -- woo hoo!
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > Pollywog wrote:
&
realize the
> layout is the same, and once you decipher a few words.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 May 1999, Sean wrote:
>
> > no it's not, I'm downloading SO5.1 right now . . .
> >
> > I'm at 75% -- woo hoo!
> >
> > Sean
> >
&
Pollywog wrote:
>
> > On 20-May-99 Bernard de Rubinat wrote:
> > > StarOffice 5.1 (just released) works with potato. When you install, it
> > > will
> > > complain that it does not find glibc 2.0.7, just ignore as you have glibc
> > > 2.1 (with
Where are you downloading is from. On www.stardivision.com the
download area is closed.
Sean wrote:
> no it's not, I'm downloading SO5.1 right now . . .
>
> I'm at 75% -- woo hoo!
>
> Sean
>
> Pollywog wrote:
>
> > On 20-May-99 Bernard de Rubinat wrot
no it's not, I'm downloading SO5.1 right now . . .
I'm at 75% -- woo hoo!
Sean
Pollywog wrote:
> On 20-May-99 Bernard de Rubinat wrote:
> > StarOffice 5.1 (just released) works with potato. When you install, it will
> > complain that it does not find glibc 2.0.7,
On 20-May-99 Bernard de Rubinat wrote:
> StarOffice 5.1 (just released) works with potato. When you install, it will
> complain that it does not find glibc 2.0.7, just ignore as you have glibc
> 2.1 (with potato).
I just found the download site, but it is closed for a day or so.
--
Andrew
On 20-May-99 Bernard de Rubinat wrote:
> StarOffice 5.1 (just released) works with potato. When you install, it will
> complain that it does not find glibc 2.0.7, just ignore as you have glibc
> 2.1 (with potato).
So this new SO works with glibc2?
I will try to find StarOffice URL and
StarOffice 5.1 (just released) works with potato. When you install, it will
complain that it does not find glibc 2.0.7, just ignore as you have glibc
2.1 (with potato).
Best regards,
Bernard
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 01:03 -0500, Brad Jorsch wrote:
> Before i begin, please CC all replies to
44 matches
Mail list logo
