On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 21:40, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Adam Hardy wrote:
>>
>> I don't have the stability problems as you describe but I don't use
>> Flashblock or Flashgot or Readability.
>>
>> I do have a problem with youtube videos and the sound, but I don't know
>> what's causing it and I haven'
On 09/12/10 23:35, Klistvud wrote:
Dne, 13. 09. 2010 06:40:24 je Marc Shapiro napisal(a):
I am running Firefox 3.6 on Lenny and I still have sound problems. I
think the problems are more due to flash games that my daughter runs
than to youtube, but flash seems to be the culprit in any case.
Y
Dne, 13. 09. 2010 06:40:24 je Marc Shapiro napisal(a):
I am running Firefox 3.6 on Lenny and I still have sound problems. I
think the problems are more due to flash games that my daughter runs
than to youtube, but flash seems to be the culprit in any case.
Yep. In my imaginary world, in s
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010, James Stuckey wrote:
Since doing so I've begun to have, for the very first time, stability
problems with iceweasel on testing when watching flash videos on youtube.
Generally, my browser will, some time during the playing of the video,
before, or after it finishes, become fr
Adam Hardy wrote:
I don't have the stability problems as you describe but I don't use
Flashblock or Flashgot or Readability.
I do have a problem with youtube videos and the sound, but I don't know
what's causing it and I haven't tried fixing it yet. I'm hoping for an
upgrade in the near futur
James Stuckey on 12/09/10 17:12, wrote:
the plug-ins listed. I installed: Adblock Plus 1.2.1, FlagFox 4.0.8,
Flashblock 1.5.13, FlashGot 1.2, Leo Search 1.0.0, NoScript 1.9.8.69,
and Readability 1.1. Some of these I installed with aptitude and the
ones that weren't I installed through firefox/t
In , James
Stuckey wrote:
>After reading the browser straw poll, I was influenced to try some of the
>plug-ins listed. I installed.
>
>Since doing so I've begun to have, for the very first time, stability
>problems with iceweasel on testing when watching flash videos on youtube.
>
>I have to assum
Hi all,
After reading the browser straw poll, I was influenced to try some of the
plug-ins listed. I installed: Adblock Plus 1.2.1, FlagFox 4.0.8, Flashblock
1.5.13, FlashGot 1.2, Leo Search 1.0.0, NoScript 1.9.8.69, and Readability
1.1. Some of these I installed with aptitude and the ones that we
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:50:02PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >Just curious: why not amd64? I'm running it on my Athlon64 3800+. The
> >_only_ thing I need 32-bit for is adobe flashplayer, for which I run a
> >chroot for the browser. That problem is fixed in Lenny
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Just curious: why not amd64? I'm running it on my Athlon64 3800+. The
_only_ thing I need 32-bit for is adobe flashplayer, for which I run a
chroot for the browser. That problem is fixed in Lenny/Sid but I didn't
want to go that route. After having done it, setting
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:14:23PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:07:59PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > if you are only installing the tasksel selections and not adding
> > additional software, then there is no reason to do this. I just know
> > that if I h
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:48:40PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> >Mike Robinson wrote:
> >>I'm almost to the point of blowing the system away and installing
> >>Etch. Anyone with insight would be appreciated.
> >
> >Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think
> >I'd like to
Mike Robinson wrote:
I'm almost to the point of blowing the system away and installing
Etch. Anyone with insight would be appreciated.
Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
like to boot with an Etch install CD, keep my partitions, but blow away
the Debian Te
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:07:59PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> if you are only installing the tasksel selections and not adding
> additional software, then there is no reason to do this. I just know
> that if I had to reinstall my current machine, I'd want to pull a list
> of what was in
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:28:07PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:04:58PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
>>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Mike Robinson wrote:
> Well,
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:04:58PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
Mike Robinson wrote:
Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
like to boot wit
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:04:58PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
>>> Mike Robinson wrote:
>>> Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
>>> like to boot with an Etch install
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
Mike Robinson wrote:
Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
like to boot with an Etch install CD, keep my partitions, but blow away the
Debian Testing installation with
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:26:36PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Mike Robinson wrote:
>> I'm almost to the point of blowing the system away and installing Etch.
>> Anyone with insight would be appreciated.
>
> Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd
> like to boot
Mike Robinson wrote:
I'm almost to the point of blowing the system away and installing Etch.
Anyone with insight would be appreciated.
Well, I've decided to throw in the towel and install Etch. I think I'd like to
boot with an Etch install CD, keep my partitions, but blow away the Debian Tes
On 7/24/07, Mike Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I went ahead and performed the above. The compile session did crash a few
times
as usual, but the oom-killer never appeared. In fact, looking through the
logs,
it hasn't appeared since July 15th (the logs I posted earlier). So, I'm
assumin
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> Next time you compile things, start a couple of sessions (=separate
> windows):
> - vmstat 5 - to keep track of free memory and swapping
> - top - sorted so the most memory hungry processes are on top
> - tail -f /var/log/syslog - to see when oom-killer fires up
> - a co
Mike Robinson wrote:
> >According to this you're running out of memory!? At least the oom-killer
> >is (disturbingly) active before the reboot, but the messages are pretty
> >definite: your 2G swap is maxed out. That's bad and will cause all sorts
> >of problems...
> >This *could* be an unhandle
Karl,
First off, thank you very much for looking so closely at my logs! I
truly appreciate your time.
I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's been
unstable since. By unstable I mean that
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:22:47AM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
> quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's been
> unstable since. By unstable I mean that applications may crash (disappear)
> an
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:37:45PM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> It has already been said, you might want to try the K7 kernel.
> I first went that route:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/07/msg00386.html
>
> Plus, it's well established that the AMD processors are
Andrei Popescu wrote:
It has already been said, you might want to try the K7 kernel.
I first went that route:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/07/msg00386.html
Plus, it's well established that the AMD processors are fully compatible
with 686 (they never would have sold a chip otherwise
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:22:47AM -0400, Mike Robinson wrote:
> I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
> quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's been
> unstable since. By unstable I mean that applications may crash (disappear)
> an
On Saturday 21 July 2007 14:22:47 Mike Robinson wrote:
> I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
> quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's
> been unstable since. By unstable I mean that applications may crash
> (disappear) and the syste
I've been running Debian testing for about a year-and-a-half. It's been
quite stable. I performed a dist-upgrade about two weeks ago. It's
been unstable since. By unstable I mean that applications may crash
(disappear) and the system may freeze. The system is freezing about
once a day.
M
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:46:47AM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> I've been noticing some very strange problems with my primary desktop. I
> normally don't shut ever shut it off and everything works great. No
> crashes, no lockups, no instability. However, any time I shut it off for
> a while befo
> Everything that attaches to a motherboard tends to do so
> quite firmly, and for good reason. Any suggestions?
I'd still crack your case and go inside, reseat all the chips (just push
down on the socketed ones, take out & replace memory DIMMS, and make sure
your processor is seated well). Migh
I've been noticing some very strange problems with my primary desktop. I
normally don't shut ever shut it off and everything works great. No
crashes, no lockups, no instability. However, any time I shut it off for
a while before turning it back on, it becomes extremely unstable. It
will crash, lock
33 matches
Mail list logo
