> hobie of RMN wrote:
>> Restating: I've installed the *.deb of Squirrelmail 1.4.23 SVN but don['t
>> see where to direct the browser in order to engage with it. Anyone
know...?
> The package should contain a configuration making it available via
http(s)://server.nam
hobie of RMN wrote:
> Restating: I've installed the *.deb of Squirrelmail 1.4.23 SVN but don['t
> see where to direct the browser in order to engage with it. Anyone
> know...?
The package should contain a configuration making it available via
http(s)://server.name/squirrelm
> hobie of RMN wrote:
>
>> I have a server running Jessie (oldoldstable) that has had
>> Squirrelmail 1.4.2 (installed manually) on it for a very long time.
>> At some point, years ago, SM became confused by a change in
>> charactersets (UTC-8, is it?), leading t
hobie of RMN wrote:
> I have a server running Jessie (oldoldstable) that has had
> Squirrelmail 1.4.2 (installed manually) on it for a very long time.
> At some point, years ago, SM became confused by a change in
> charactersets (UTC-8, is it?), leading to erratic dropping of lin
I have a server running Jessie (oldoldstable) that has had Squirrelmail
1.4.2 (installed manually) on it for a very long time. At some point,
years ago, SM became confused by a change in charactersets (UTC-8, is
it?), leading to erratic dropping of lines of text. I've just installed
SM
Brian writes:
> On Tue 30 Jan 2018 at 10:34:21 -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>> I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and
>> oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated
>> (as one would suspect from it not being
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 08:38:01PM +, raju...@disroot.org wrote:
> January 30, 2018 11:27 PM, "Joe Pfeiffer" wrote:
>
> > I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and
> > oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now dep
January 30, 2018 11:27 PM, "Joe Pfeiffer" wrote:
> I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and
> oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated
> (as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian
> ver
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:08:54PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and
> > oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated
> > (as one would suspect from
On Tue 30 Jan 2018 at 10:34:21 -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and
> oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated
> (as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian
> ver
On ter, 30 jan 2018, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and
oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated
(as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian
versions)? Is there some other we
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and
> oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated
> (as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian
> versions)? Is there some other webmail
Speaking strictly as a user, I really liked SquirrelMail, when I was on
my old ISP (or on the rare occasions when I check my former ISP email),
but I utterly despise everything about the "SmarterMail" product that my
present ISP uses. (It seems like they chose to emulate almost
I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and
oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated
(as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian
versions)? Is there some other webmail interface that's being used now?
Note t
il.example.com:443 -CApath /etc/ssl/certs
After the above steps, I fixed the problem by changing the server name
via /etc/squirrelmail/config.pl
Using localhost is not an option, you need the actual FQDN now.
Cheers
AndrewM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iF4EAREIAAYFAlY/aIcACgkQqBZry7
amd64
php5-common5.4.45-0+deb7u1 amd64
libapache2-mod-php55.6.14-1~dotdeb+zts+7.1 amd64
php5-cli 5.6.14-1~dotdeb+zts+7.1 amd64
php5-common5.6.14-1~dotdeb+zts+7.1 amd64
Having done that, squirrelmail
It should use whatever SASL authentication method(s) you have already setup in
Dovecot/Cyrus. So there's nothing "new" that you need to add as far as
authentication credentials go.
Hi Dan! Thank you, solved
cheers!
--
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On 18/02/2014 07:26, Dan Purgert wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 07:01, Pol Hallen wrote:
>> Hi all :-)
>>
>> for long years I using squirrelmail without authentication (smtp).
>>
>> Now I'd like migrate to smtp with ssl authentication, I already
>> configur
On 18/02/2014 07:01, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> for long years I using squirrelmail without authentication (smtp).
>
> Now I'd like migrate to smtp with ssl authentication, I already
> configured postfix to do this, so...
>
> Do I need enter manually each
Hi all :-)
for long years I using squirrelmail without authentication (smtp).
Now I'd like migrate to smtp with ssl authentication, I already
configured postfix to do this, so...
Do I need enter manually each credetials for each user? Or can I solve
with other way? (I don't
> No plugins needed: just click the 'Toggle all' link above the message
> list or another under the list. If the list does not show all messages,
> you can click "Show all" link first, then "Toggle all".
done
thanks :)
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 31.3.2010 14:44, Pol Hallen wrote:
> hi all :)
>
> Using squirrelmail on debian stable, I can't see how select all
> messages.
> it there a way or plugin to do this?
> thanks
No plugins needed: just click the 'Toggle all' link above the message
list or another
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:44:13 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Using squirrelmail on debian stable, I can't see how select all
> messages.
> it there a way or plugin to do this?
Check if that helps:
***
http://squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=157
Plugins - Select Range
Category: Me
hi all :)
Using squirrelmail on debian stable, I can't see how select all
messages.
it there a way or plugin to do this?
thanks
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
Tudod Ki put forth on 1/2/2010 6:59 AM:
> ok...I've installed webmin:
>
> http://software.virtualmin.com/gpl/scripts/install.sh
>
> then I've installed squirrelmail on Debian Lenny.
>
> How could I get squirrelmail to only use HTTPS? [And how exactly I could
>
ok...I've installed webmin:
http://software.virtualmin.com/gpl/scripts/install.sh
then I've installed squirrelmail on Debian Lenny.
How could I get squirrelmail to only use HTTPS? [And how exactly I could reach
it through HTTPS?].
Can someone post a good howto, docs, or
On Sat December 19 2009 15:14:26 thing wrote:
> So basically I cant install any web based webmail packages without
> totalling apache.
I've never had any problems with squirrelmail with these versions:
# dpkg -l | grep -i '\(apache\|php\|squirrel\)' | sort -n |
-12-2009 5:08, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a webmail package as an alternative to squirrelmail?
regards
Steven
I use Roundcube for its simplicity, and Horde for its groupware
capabilities (calendar, notes, tasks, etc).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-12-2009 5:08, Steven Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone recommend a webmail package as an alternative to squirrelmail?
>
> regards
>
> Steven
>
>
I use Roundcube for its simplicity, and Horde for its groupware
ca
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a webmail package as an alternative to squirrelmail?
regards
Steven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I have a clean install of apache2 on Lenny, and once I have apache and
dovecot running I attempt to install squirrelmail and the "it works"
page packs up and I get this in messages and syslog.
Dec 19 16:37:30 warlock kernel: [ 62.058108] apache2[2230]: segfault
at 0 ip b
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 19:20 +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> --- Yuriy Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> > Try to run the following on on your box and see what processes are
> > listen to
> > those ports:
> >
> > # netstat -lnp
> >
> > Normally these ports are used by imapd - normal and secure
> > connections.
phen Liu
> wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 11:38 +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > > I need ports 143 and 993 for another test. I suspect
> SquirrelMail
> > > > taking up those ports.
> > >
> > > Your
wrote:
> >
> > > I need ports 143 and 993 for another test. I suspect SquirrelMail
> > > taking up those ports.
> >
> > Your imap server will listen on those ports; Squirrelmail will
> > connect
> > to one of those, but not listen on it.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 11:38 +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
>
> > I need ports 143 and 993 for another test. I suspect SquirrelMail
> > taking up those ports.
>
> Your imap server will listen on those ports; Squirrelmail will
> connect
> to one of those, but n
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 11:38 +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> I need ports 143 and 993 for another test. I suspect SquirrelMail
> taking up those ports.
Your imap server will listen on those ports; Squirrelmail will connect
to one of those, but not listen on it.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
--- Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >
> > Debian Etch
> > Postfix
> > SquirrelMail
> > Apache2
> >
> >
> > Please advise how to stop squirrelmail, the
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> Debian Etch
> Postfix
> SquirrelMail
> Apache2
>
>
> Please advise how to stop squirrelmail, the webmail, running
> temporarily. TIA
Stop apache? Add a temporary rewrite / alias /
Hi folks,
Debian Etch
Postfix
SquirrelMail
Apache2
Please advise how to stop squirrelmail, the webmail, running
temporarily. TIA
B.R.
satimis
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1) Is anyone running squirrelmail *and* the g/pgp plugin successfully?
>> 2) On debian stable?
>> 3) With apache 1.3?
> Anyone expects to get some help without providing some actual input?
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:06:53PM -0500, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
> Is anyone running squirrelmail *and* the g/pgp plugin successfully?
>
> On debian stable?
>
> With apache 1.3?
>
> The thing can't encrypt, and it has stopped signing now. I know that
> soun
Eric d'Alibut wrote:
Is anyone running squirrelmail *and* the g/pgp plugin successfully?
On debian stable?
With apache 1.3?
The thing can't encrypt, and it has stopped signing now. I know that
sounds weird and New Agey magical, but that's what happened!
Any feedback would
Is anyone running squirrelmail *and* the g/pgp plugin successfully?
On debian stable?
With apache 1.3?
The thing can't encrypt, and it has stopped signing now. I know that
sounds weird and New Agey magical, but that's what happened!
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Best regard
> I had the same problem a month before and during my search I found pages
> mentioning thunderbird doesn't support DIGEST-MD5.
>
So I have to use CRAM-MD5 and disable TLS support from Postfix and
everything works without any error.
But still I dont understand,why squirrelmail
The Thursday 17 July 2008 23:21:03 Semih Gokalp, you wrote :
> Thanks for reply.
>
> I don't know how (and if) SquirrelMail can be configured to use STARTTLS.
> It
>
> > is possible, however, to configure exim to listen on another port using
> > the TLS-on-con
Semih Gokalp wrote:
> Secure SMTP servers use tcp 465 port by TLS default.Source address:
> http://www.squirrelmail.org/docs/admin/admin-5.html#ss5.5
> i tried but did not work.
>From there, it seems Squirrelmail supports both TLS-on-connect (which
uses port 465) and STARTTLS, whic
Thanks for reply.
I don't know how (and if) SquirrelMail can be configured to use STARTTLS. It
> is possible, however, to configure exim to listen on another port using the
> TLS-on-connect convention.
Secure SMTP servers use tcp 465 port by TLS default.Source ad
Semih Gokalp escreveu:
Hi all.
I asked this problem to squirrelmail-users mail list but I could not
answer about this problem so If it doesn't problem,I want to ask this
problem to debian users mail list.
I have Debian 4.0 Etch and i use Postfix 2.3.8-2 and Dovecot
1.0.rc15-2etch4 IMA
Hi all.
I asked this problem to squirrelmail-users mail list but I could not answer
about this problem so If it doesn't problem,I want to ask this problem to
debian users mail list.
I have Debian 4.0 Etch and i use Postfix 2.3.8-2 and Dovecot 1.0.rc15-2etch4
IMAP and POP3 Server that i
Hello ,
I am trying to use courierpassd package with courier-imap (to enable
squirrelmail changepass plugin)
I am also using courier-authdaemon with pam (local user in my mail server)
Here is my configuration of xinetd to use courierpassd
service courierpassd
{
port = 106
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of H.S.
> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 12:54 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: anybody using squirrelmail? about server side filtering.
>
> Hello,
>
> This may be a b
Hello,
This may be a bit off topic, not sure. Our administrators in our
department at school are installing a new mail server and a new version
of squirrelmail. In the process they are taking out procmail from the
system :( (can't procmail be used with squirrelmail?)
The new squirre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Wolfe, Robert wrote:
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:42:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Wolfe, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ernst-Magne Vindal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian users
Subject: Re: Latest Squirrelmail
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
He wants 1.4.8, not 1.4.4-8. (or 1.5.1)
John
Jepp, my mistake, not a good day or something.
just ignore it please, I do when I see stupid mistake like this
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject
of "unsubscribe".
On Mon, September 4, 2006 10:26 am, Ernst-Magne Vindal said:
> Its available from apt.
>
> dpkg -l squirrelmail
> ii squirrelmail 1.4.4-8 Webmail for nuts
>
> Installed on Debian kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386, stable
I already run this version. I am
John Fleming a écrit :
- Original Message - From: "Ernst-Magne Vindal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian users"
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: Latest Squirrelmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, W
- Original Message -
From: "Ernst-Magne Vindal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian users"
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: Latest Squirrelmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Wolfe, Robert wrote:
Date
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Wolfe, Robert wrote:
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:42:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Wolfe, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Latest Squirrelmail
Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:45:58 -0
Good morning everyone! Just signed up for the list so thought I would
make my first posting here.
I was wondering if someone has made the 1.5.1 or 1.4.8 versions of
SquirrelMail available in .DEB format by any chance? I am running 1.4.4
here and would very much like to try and upgrade if at
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:31:06 +0100
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Squirrelmail and logger
> Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:31:14 -0500 (
Hi all,
My /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins have lots off stuff, but nothing for
logger.
Here is the *squirrel_logger*?
My box is Debian Sid, and all squirrelmail packages are installed.
Thanks in advance
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Friday, 07.07.2006 at 10:25 +0100, nx13464a wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The mail server is a Sendmail 8.13.7 and SquirrelMail version is 1.4.6
> and i'm using Debian Sid.
> My problem is: a user enter with is user account like user1. When the
> user reply or send a messag
Hi all,
The mail server is a Sendmail 8.13.7 and SquirrelMail version is 1.4.6
and i'm using Debian Sid.
My problem is: a user enter with is user account like user1. When the
user reply or send a message the information about the sender is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and not the alias name like [
trouble with my mail-server running courier-imap and
> squirrelmail after moving it to a new box.
> The accounts allready there works just fine, but when I tried adding
> another account (by adding another user and password in the user-list in
> mysql) it didn't make the require
Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
> Hi there list.
> I'm having trouble with my mail-server running courier-imap and
> squirrelmail after moving it to a new box.
> The accounts allready there works just fine, but when I tried adding
> another account (by adding another user and passw
Hi there list.
I'm having trouble with my mail-server running courier-imap and
squirrelmail after moving it to a new box.
The accounts allready there works just fine, but when I tried adding
another account (by adding another user and password in the user-list in
mysql) it didn't make th
Michele Della Marina wrote:
Hello!!
I've some problems after installing squirrelmail, the error is:
ERROR : Could not complete request.
Query: SELECT "INBOX"
Reason Given: Unable to open this mailbox.
and
ERROR : Connection dropped by imap-server.
Query: SUBSCRIBE "INBO
Hello!!
I've some problems after installing squirrelmail, the error is:
ERROR : Could not complete request.
Query: SELECT "INBOX"
Reason Given: Unable to open this mailbox.
and
ERROR : Connection dropped by imap-server.
Query: SUBSCRIBE "INBOX.Sent"
I know that proba
Hi,
I am running Squirrelmail 1.4.6-1 on a system that is mostly sarge
with some etch packages. This morning, tripwire reported that
/usr/sbin/squirrelmail-configure has changed and indeed, in line 388,
'Organization Title' was changed to 'Organization Ditle'.
I am no
> i need do this, but haw i can do ?
> =20
> Allow plain text logins on your imap server. Only do=20
> this if your squirrelmail web server and the imap server
> are on the same machine. And even then make sure the
> imap server
i need do this, but haw i can do ? Allow plain text logins on your imap server. Only do this if your squirrelmail web server and the imap server are on the same machine. And even then make sure the imap server accepts plain text logins from the loop
Steve Lamb wrote:
> When I configure squirrelmail to use plain auth it hangs and eventually
> dovecot times out and closes down the connection. At that point Squirrelmail
> dutifully tells me that dovecot closed down the connection.
I was close. Finally found a page which gave
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> For what it's worth, snapshot.debian.net archives all .deb's released by
> the Debian project (although it's been non-functional for the past few
> days).
I'll keep that in mind, thanks. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 02:50:21PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> For the record downgrading dovecot and squirrelmail to the same version or
> at least as close as I could get, same problem.
For what it's worth, snapshot.debian.net archives all .deb's released by
the Debian p
Steve Lamb wrote:
> I've purged and reinstalled dovecot several times to no avail. All
> permissions look fine. I'm at a loss as to what could be the problem.
> Several searches on Google don't yield any useful hints.
For the record downgrading dovecot and
Recently I moved my mail/web services from one machine to another. I
moved over all relevant configuration and data files. Exim/SA/ClamAV are all
playing nice. Dovecot works fine with Thunderbird. However I am having an
annoying problem with Squirrelmail. After entering my login
Am 2006-02-25 23:04:08, schrieb Carl Fink:
> Well, dpkg told me (correctly) that php4 was not installed and was required.
> A quick "apt-get install php4" caused Squirrelmail to automatically complete
> its installation from my previous attempts to install with apt-get.
gave a better explanation
than apt-get, and I could just install php4 to solve the problem.
> I mean, if an apt-get install squirrelmail tries to uninstall apache-ssl
> in favour of apache2 then it should be classified as a bug. You should
> not have to apt-get install php4 first as
p4 was not installed and was required.
> A quick "apt-get install php4" caused Squirrelmail to automatically complete
> its installation from my previous attempts to install with apt-get.
>
> So the missing dependency on PHP4 caused Apt to insist on installing Apache2
> an
Advice before I report this is requested.
As mentioned in the previous thread I started, installing Squirrelmail on a
Stable server I'm setting up for some reason resulted in Apt insisting on
Apache2, even though apache-ssl was already installed.
I'm running out of time on this server
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 03:59:39PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:43:06PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > The docs for squirrelmail say it depends on either apache2 or httpd
> > (virtual). The httpd docs say it is supplied by many web server packages
>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:43:06PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> The docs for squirrelmail say it depends on either apache2 or httpd
> (virtual). The httpd docs say it is supplied by many web server packages
> including apache. However, attempting to install squirrelmail on my server,
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>ms linux said:
>
>
>>I've got Squirrelmail 1.4.5 installed on my unstable
>>box using sid with PHP4, uw-imap ssl and apache2.
>>The installation went fine. But everytime I access the
>>Folder link, there's nothing happen.
&g
ms linux said:
> I've got Squirrelmail 1.4.5 installed on my unstable
> box using sid with PHP4, uw-imap ssl and apache2.
> The installation went fine. But everytime I access the
> Folder link, there's nothing happen.
How many folders do you have? Also do you have any
The docs for squirrelmail say it depends on either apache2 or httpd
(virtual). The httpd docs say it is supplied by many web server packages
including apache. However, attempting to install squirrelmail on my server,
which runs apache, results in apt-get trying to install apache2. Why?
Is this
Darryl Clarke wrote:
> On 12/02/06, ms linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I've got Squirrelmail 1.4.5 installed on my unstable
>>box using sid with PHP4, uw-imap ssl and apache2.
>>The installation went fine. But everytime I access the
>>Folder link, th
On 12/02/06, ms linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got Squirrelmail 1.4.5 installed on my unstable
> box using sid with PHP4, uw-imap ssl and apache2.
> The installation went fine. But everytime I access the
> Folder link, there's nothing happen.
> Apache2 erro
I've got Squirrelmail 1.4.5 installed on my unstable
box using sid with PHP4, uw-imap ssl and apache2.
The installation went fine. But everytime I access the
Folder link, there's nothing happen.
Apache2 error log says "Allowed memory size of
16777216 bytes exhausted (tried to all
php4 4.4.2-1
apache-ssl 1.3.34-2
squirrelmail 1.4.5-2
I use squirrelmail from debian testing and for a few months and get the
following php error:
Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in
/usr/share/squirrelmail/src/read_body.php on line 431
when I enter any
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 21:37 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> As plugins are only exposed when enabled by the admin in some way via a
> config option in /etc/squirrelmail, I too feel this would be the best
> solution if we were to package the plugins ourselves.
Just to be clear: I&#x
Hello all,
Well apparently some of us are interested in the squirrelmail plugins. We should
definetely push it.
>> .. I feel this would be the best option. Security updates are
>> important since all of this will be exposed to the net. Size doesn't
>> matter, even if
lander and security/admin.
As plugins are only exposed when enabled by the admin in some way
via a
config option in /etc/squirrelmail, I too feel this would be the best
solution if we were to package the plugins ourselves.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber &
eletions and act appropiately when upgrading?
Depends on what you think is appropriate: apt (or rather, dpkg) will
simply restore the deleted files on upgrade (it cannot know which ones
were deleted intentionally).
As plugins are only exposed when enabled by the admin in some way via a
config optio
On 24-jan-2006, at 15:24, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hello Josep,
To install any plugin you have to download the tarball and detar
the package into
your squirrelmail plugins directory. Eventually for each
particular plugin some
configuration file might be edited.
I guess new updates of
Hello Josep,
> To install any plugin you have to download the tarball and detar the package
> into
> your squirrelmail plugins directory. Eventually for each particular plugin
> some
> configuration file might be edited.
>
> I guess new updates of squirrelmail will break
I got it working. It wasn't hard to install. Big thanks go to Peter Teunissen.
To install any plugin you have to download the tarball and detar the package
into
your squirrelmail plugins directory. Eventually for each particular plugin some
configuration file might be edited.
I gues
rsion 2.0.55-3 doesn't
seem to work with squirrelmail.
regards,
That's good! I'm glad you managed to sort things out. We use
squirrelmail a lot, and I know that sometimes it's a bit of a struggle
to get it going, but once it is up, it normally keeps on working for
x27;t seem
to work with squirrelmail.
regards,
--
Lubos
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L operation failed with code 1. OpenSSL Error
messages: error:140943FC:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert bad
record mac in /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/configtest.php on line 255"
Did you run the configuration script before you ran the test script? Did
you change anything?
What ve
hi,
It seems to be complaining about your network card. Was the NIC changed
during this "upgrade"? In other words, is the same ethernet card being
used?
this was just software update. the machine is debian testing, i386.
iirc, there is only one ethernet card in it, and the IP remained the
sam
1 - 100 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
