On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:09:21AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> Hello Kev,
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:44:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I use pine and forwards are quoted inline not as attachments. So,
> > my message is like this:
> > HEADER_WITH_SPAM_AS_SUBJECT
> > BLANK_LINE
> >
Hello Kev,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:44:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use pine and forwards are quoted inline not as attachments. So,
> my message is like this:
> HEADER_WITH_SPAM_AS_SUBJECT
> BLANK_LINE
> INLINE_FORWARD
> BLANK_LINE
> whereas with an forward'ed attachment might be li
On Mon, Oct 13 at 16:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned the following:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 at 08:08 GMT, Johann Spies penned:
>
>> These 4 options can be sorted out with procmail. I also realized
>> that the from: would be from your network and the to: wou
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 at 08:08 GMT, Johann Spies penned:
> >
> >> These 4 options can be sorted out with procmail. I also realized that
> >> the from: would be from your network and the to: would be you, also
> >> on your network, so that would diffe
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:30:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> I did not know about the '+' option. That is nice.
>
> > Now once that is done, you need to determine what to do with the 4
> > mail types: inline forward, attachment forward, inl
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 at 08:08 GMT, Johann Spies penned:
>
>> These 4 options can be sorted out with procmail. I also realized that
>> the from: would be from your network and the to: would be you, also
>> on your network, so that would differentiate it from other mails
>> using procmail. Also, you
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:30:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First I was confused by your phrase 'send me .. as attachments'
Apologies for not being clear enough.
> there are 2 formats that various mailreader use: inline and attachment. So,
> you'd have to check for both types and extrac
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Johann Spies wrote:
> I administer 3 email servers which use spamassassin. We are testing
> the service with about 110 users whose email are scanned by SA.
>
> My arrangement with them is to send me either spam that scored too low
> or false positives as attachments with ei
I administer 3 email servers which use spamassassin. We are testing
the service with about 110 users whose email are scanned by SA.
My arrangement with them is to send me either spam that scored too low
or false positives as attachments with either "spam" or "ham" in the
Subject-line.
What I wan
9 matches
Mail list logo
