Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this case, blowfish is a nice speed improvement. Any idea, why
> it' not the default?
I would assume it has something to do with 3des being older. In ssh
man-pages it is said, that blowfish _appear_ very secure. I think
BSD-folks are just being con
Samuli Suonpaa wrote:
> > Stop! Could the file /var/www/testi.100M be in the OS cache during
> > the second try?
>
> It was, but it was there the first time also, I deliberately ran both
> these commands a couple of times and only reported the last attempt.
> (Should have mentioned that, thoug
Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Samuli Suonpaa wrote:
>> $ time scp -c 3des -q oberon:/var/www/testi.100M /dev/zero
>>
>> real 1m28.652s
>> user 0m0.050s
>> sys 0m0.450s
>> $ time scp -c blowfish -q oberon:/var/www/testi.100M /dev/zero
>>
>> real 0m27.329s
>> user 0m0.070s
>> sys
Samuli Suonpaa wrote:
> $ time scp -c 3des -q oberon:/var/www/testi.100M /dev/zero
>
> real 1m28.652s
> user 0m0.050s
> sys 0m0.450s
> $ time scp -c blowfish -q oberon:/var/www/testi.100M /dev/zero
>
> real 0m27.329s
> user 0m0.070s
> sys 0m0.390s
>
> Nice difference, right?
Stop! Co
Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect that the problem lies with scp. On my local network I
> experience transfer rates of less than 200kB/s with scp because the
> server is an old Pentium 133 with not enough horse power. With
> plain old rcp I get up to 6MB/s on a 100MB (half d
5 matches
Mail list logo
