On 21 April 2017 at 03:11, Cindy-Sue Causey
wrote:
> On 4/20/17, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Patrick Bartek writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > fc:
> >> > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed?
> >> >
> >> > Because this exclu
On 04/20/2017 05:52 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
wrote:
fc:
Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:52:39PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> wrote:
>
> > fc:
> > >
> > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
> >
> > You have no idea *how much*
On 4/20/17, Ben Finney wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
>> wrote:
>>
>> > fc:
>> > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed?
>> >
>> > Because this excludes use cases that are deemed valid by the list
>> > masters.
>>
>> Like
Patrick Bartek writes:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> wrote:
>
> > fc:
> > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed?
> >
> > Because this excludes use cases that are deemed valid by the list
> > masters.
>
> Like what?
I can't speak for the list masters,
Joel Rees writes:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
>> wrote:
>>
>>> fc:
>>> >
>>> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>>>
>>> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of t
Patrick Bartek writes:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> wrote:
>
>> fc:
>> >
>> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>>
>> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
>> masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all o
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
> wrote:
>
>> fc:
>> >
>> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>>
>> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
>> masters. But it's n
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker
wrote:
> fc:
> >
> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>
> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
> masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300
> Debian lists¹ wit
On 20 April 2017 at 21:40, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> fc:
> >
> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
>
> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
> masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300 Debian
> lists¹ with thousan
fc:
>
> Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?
You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list
masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300 Debian
lists¹ with thousands of posts each day.
> I see these types of things come throug
Dear debian-user readers,
Because Debian has a policy of open lists (posting allowed without
subscribing) it may happen that the occasional spam will pass the
*excellent* filters. In such cases, please:
- do not reply to the spam message, it makes it impossible to clean the
archives afterwar
* "Samuel" == Samuel R Scarano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Samuel> 2) the fact that no '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is subscribed to
Samuel> the list?
You are not required to be subscribe to post to the list. It is more
trouble than it is worth - I am on three such lists.
Ciao,
Martin
I France it will be no problem,
Everybody know the price for spaming ist 1000 UD$
and if I send him a Lawer, he has no chance and MUST pay.
I think, Debian MUST do that TOO
Webmistress Michelle
Michelle's Internet Service
Strasbourg - France
At 02:24 17.06.1999 -0300, you wrote
>
Oops -- that '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' was me (Samuel Scarano) --
there's no such thing as tumbolia.debian.org -- I'm surprised the list
server accepted that! What happened was, I sent the message using mh
(from my laptop, which is (and was) connected via the t1 we have at my
job), which tries to send ma
What's the deal with spam? I mean, on the mailing list signup page,
there's a message about an automatic $1000 fee for spam; does SPI ever
actually collect on this?
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
[blah,blah,blah]
>as it is not our intention to spam but to let individuals know about
>ad
16 matches
Mail list logo
