Re: OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD

1999-06-21 Thread Illo de' Illis
On Sun, Jun 20, 1999 at 11:39:18AM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > "People" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > PLEASE > > GIVE-ME OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD > > Sorry but it seems like you caps lock i broken. > > OPL3-SAx works almost perfect with the new

Re: OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD

1999-06-20 Thread Peter Makholm
"People" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PLEASE > GIVE-ME OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD Sorry but it seems like you caps lock i broken. OPL3-SAx works almost perfect with the new 2.2.x kernels. Grab a kernel source read the Documentation/sound/OPL3SAx, compile and be happy. I thi

OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD

1999-06-18 Thread People
PLEASE GIVE-ME OPL3SAX SOUND BOARD ALL DRIVERS TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]   THANK YOU

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread Ed Cogburn
Hamori Andras wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: > > > > > With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel > > config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the > > kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16, for example I > > need a config li

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread Ed Cogburn
Bob Nielsen wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, steven walsh wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: > > > > > > With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel > > > config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the > > > kernel, they must be built as module

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread Hamori Andras
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: > > With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel > config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the > kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16, for example I > need a config line like: > > options sb io=0

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread steven walsh
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote: > The configuration of sound AS A MODULE has changed. It is still valid to > compile sound support into the kernel (except possibly for PnP sound > cards). > Indeed. If you specific PNP support I haven't had any problems, though the defaul

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, steven walsh wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: > > > > With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel > > config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the > > kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16, for example I > > ne

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-23 Thread steven walsh
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: > > With 2.2, the config of sound drivers occurs outside the kernel > config. You can no longer build the sound modules into the > kernel, they must be built as modules. With sb16, for example I > need a config line like: > > options sb io=0x22

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-22 Thread Ed Cogburn
Petru NOTINGHER wrote: > > -- > > Subject: Re: Sound Board > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:44:34 +0100 > From: Petru NOTINGHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: LEM /UM 2 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] &

Re: Sound Board

1999-03-22 Thread Petru NOTINGHER
--- Begin Message --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What sound driver are you using? OSS (comes with kernel) or ALSA? I'm using OSS. What's ALSA ? Is that the manufacturer's driver ? > Also, do > you have sound compiled in, or as module? Kernel version would help too. I tried both, but none work

Sound Board

1999-03-22 Thread Petru NOTINGHER
Hello. I'm trying to make an ALS 100 Sound Device to work on a Linux machine. Apparently, the card is recognized as a full-compatible SoundBlaster 16 card at the boot time, and that is what it is. The proc/dma and /proc/interrupts show it, but the /dev/sndstat and the/dev/tkmixer are not created