Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-26 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Vincent Danjean wrote: > What was wrong is that the default paths have not been changed. To solve > the problem, we just have to add the correct default paths in > /etc/modutils/path, do update-modules, depmod -a, and all is good. In that case you didn't read what modutils tells you whe

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-26 Thread Vincent Danjean
The problems come from the modutils package and the PATH. When I installed the 'buggy' package, I saw a message about the line PATH in the conf.modules file. The syntaxe of the line has changed from PATH[fs]=/lib/module/2.2.12 to PATH[fs]=/lib/module/2.2.12/fs (I'm not sure of the correct syntaxe,

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Art Lemasters
/etc/modules.conf and /etc/modutils were replaced on this machine (potato) two days ago. /etc/modules.conf.old was made on the 19th (six days ago). Art

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Art Lemasters
On a most recent upgrade, I noticed that there was a question posed by the system on modutils, along with a prompt to say no or hit "enter." ...sorry, but although I remember there was a notice about involved config files being replaced, I did not jot it down. I chose "enter," to make the cha

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Jean Pierre LeJacq
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Vaidhyanathan G Mayilrangam wrote: > > I have the same problem. I upgraded my potato machine yesterday. I had > > a bunch of unresolved symbols. I did a update-modules. Now my machine > > is complaining about /etc/modules.conf being older t

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Pollywog
I have had this problem on Potato for at least a week. I was able to eliminate it by recompiling my kernel, but that did not work after my most recent upgrade about three days ago. -- Andrew On 25-Oct-99 Vaidhyanathan G Mayilrangam wrote: > I have the same problem. I upgraded my potato machine y

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Vaidhyanathan G Mayilrangam wrote: > I have the same problem. I upgraded my potato machine yesterday. I had > a bunch of unresolved symbols. I did a update-modules. Now my machine > is complaining about /etc/modules.conf being older than > /lib/modules/2.2.5/modules.dep. It's a warning

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Patrick Kirk
Many thanks!

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Jerry Lundström
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 13:43:22 +0100, "Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi Jerry, > >I used moved from slink to potato as well. Is there a howto on how to get >and compile a 2.2 kernel? > Not realy, there is HOWTO's on the basic things about compileing the kernel. Check you /usr/doc/HOWTO

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Patrick Kirk
Hi Jerry, I used moved from slink to potato as well. Is there a howto on how to get and compile a 2.2 kernel? Thanks in advance, Patrick

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Vaidhyanathan G Mayilrangam
I have the same problem. I upgraded my potato machine yesterday. I had a bunch of unresolved symbols. I did a update-modules. Now my machine is complaining about /etc/modules.conf being older than /lib/modules/2.2.5/modules.dep. Somehow, the depmod -a from init.d script seems to be not writing t

Re: Something wrong with potato modutils

1999-10-25 Thread Jerry Lundström
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 01:36:18 -0700 (PDT), George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Well, I THINK it is modutils that is causing the problem. Two machines, >both upgraded yesterday. Now neither one can properly depmod. All modules >report unresolved symbols and refuse to load. > >NOTE this onl