Re: Some clarification is needed on Debian repos.

Thank You for Your time and answer, Alan: >deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free >Use the same info for sources.list but replace lenny with squeeze. Is it for testing OR unstable - if I change lenny w/ squeeze? > Yes, the mirrors contain oldstable (etch), stable (l

Re: Some clarification is needed on Debian repos.

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:44:10AM -0700, Alan Ianson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 21:51 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote: > > Good day. > > > > Could You please explain, should some security testing repo be > > specified for a stable + testing Debian, or stable, updates and testing > > repos is all that

Re: Some clarification is needed on Debian repos.

On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 21:51 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote: > Good day. > > Could You please explain, should some security testing repo be > specified for a stable + testing Debian, or stable, updates and testing > repos is all that should be enabled for the stable, testing with all > *for the repos* secu

Some clarification is needed on Debian repos.

Good day. Could You please explain, should some security testing repo be specified for a stable + testing Debian, or stable, updates and testing repos is all that should be enabled for the stable, testing with all *for the repos* security fixes? In other words, is there a security repo for testin