kernel: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=208)

1998-11-26 Thread Ryan Lackey
I keep getting these messages on a debian potato system with a 2.1.129 kernel. I've been getting them for months, using various versions of the development kernel with slink -- I have IPv6 compiled into the kernel, an SMC Ultra II/EPIC network card, etc. Is there any known cause for these? I've

Re: socket destroy delayed

1998-11-11 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, joseph evan porter wrote: : > : > I keep on seeing the following error message appear over and over in : > /var/log/syslog: : > : > Nov 10 13:21:46 chinook kernel: Socket destroy delayed (r=112 w=0) : > : > Does anyone have any idea wha

Re: socket destroy delayed

1998-11-11 Thread joseph evan porter
> > I keep on seeing the following error message appear over and over in > /var/log/syslog: > > Nov 10 13:21:46 chinook kernel: Socket destroy delayed (r=112 w=0) > > Does anyone have any idea what this might be about? > I'm not sure, but I've been getting th

socket destroy delayed

1998-11-10 Thread Max
I keep on seeing the following error message appear over and over in /var/log/syslog: Nov 10 13:21:46 chinook kernel: Socket destroy delayed (r=112 w=0) Does anyone have any idea what this might be about? Max

Re: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, I have seen this with the latest net packages in most version since 1.3.95, I think. Still happens at 1.99.8, but less so than some earlier kernels. I have yet to boot 1.99.10. Hasn't caused my any problems, but YMMV. manoj -- "Bond reflected that good Americ

Re: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Rob Browning
ts transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340) > || > > I never saw this before ! Anything to worry about ? > My netbase is version 2.02-1. We had this on the machines in the lab for a short while. I believe it went

Re: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Peter Tobias
ved, 100% packet loss > > Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340) > || > > I never saw this before ! Anything to worry about ? > My netbase is version 2.02-1. It's a kernel problem. If you just get a few of these messages it's ok. If you get a lot of the

Re: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Austin Donnelly
packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > >Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340) >|| > >I never saw this before ! Anything to worry about ? >My netbase is version 2.02-1. This is a kernel problem, well known about by the kernel developers. The very

Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=1340)

1996-06-02 Thread Gerd Bavendiek
Hi, on a quite recently installed Debian-1.1 box I sometimes encounter the following. koko:/root>>> ping us1by-6 PING us1by-6 (156.53.107.26): 56 data bytes --- us1by-6 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss Socket destroy delayed (r

Re: Socket Destroy Delayed...

1996-05-08 Thread Michael Meskes
Luis F. Gonzalez writes: > I am installing Debian 1.1 using an NFS mounted site through my ethernet > and keep having this message > > Socket Destroy Delayed (r=0 w=236) > > What is this? what's going on? Don't worry. It's a message from the kernel. It has no

Socket Destroy Delayed...

1996-05-06 Thread Luis F. Gonzalez
Hi, I am installing Debian 1.1 using an NFS mounted site through my ethernet and keep having this message Socket Destroy Delayed (r=0 w=236) What is this? what's going on? Thanks, Luis.