Re: Objective data instead of subjective wooliness (was Re: Slow web browsing redux)

2007-06-04 Thread CaT
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:56:33AM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote: > Try http://bugs.debian.org/wnpp > > That is a great "benchmark" page for any browser. That took 10 seconds from the moment it got over its data gathering hump (ie the download). Using SeaMonkey 1.1.2 under Linux here. Still on

Re: Objective data instead of subjective wooliness (was Re: Slow web browsing redux)

2007-06-04 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:34:16PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 06/04/07 18:36, Carl Fink wrote: > >So today I tried k-meleon on my XP laptop. > > > >It's like lightning. Subjectively it's 2-3 times faster than FireFox. > > > >All web searches indicate that the closest equivalents under Linux ar

Objective data instead of subjective wooliness (was Re: Slow web browsing redux)

2007-06-04 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/04/07 18:36, Carl Fink wrote: So today I tried k-meleon on my XP laptop. It's like lightning. Subjectively it's 2-3 times faster than FireFox. All web searches indicate that the closest equivalents under Linux are Galeon and Epiphany. Both are enormously slower than k-meleon, and neithe

Slow web browsing redux

2007-06-04 Thread Carl Fink
So today I tried k-meleon on my XP laptop. It's like lightning. Subjectively it's 2-3 times faster than FireFox. All web searches indicate that the closest equivalents under Linux are Galeon and Epiphany. Both are enormously slower than k-meleon, and neither has the key feature of supporting FF