Ron Johnson wrote:
On 08/11/08 01:01, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/12/08 02:00, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
The "inner" scroll region? No sluggishness or slowdown. Noticeable
CPU usage by /usr/bin/X11/X when I rapidly jerk the scroll bar up
and down, but that's n
On 08/11/08 01:01, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/12/08 02:00, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
The "inner" scroll region? No sluggishness or slowdown. Noticeable
CPU usage by /usr/bin/X11/X when I rapidly jerk the scroll bar up
and down, but that's normal.
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/12/08 02:00, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
The "inner" scroll region? No sluggishness or slowdown. Noticeable
CPU usage by /usr/bin/X11/X when I rapidly jerk the scroll bar up
and down, but that's normal.
Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
You can use a userContent style sheet to do that. Add this line
* { background-image: none ! important; }
to the file
~/.mozilla/firefox/.default/chrome/userContent.css
Thanks for that. It seemd to have mostly fixed the sluggishness on the
page (http://www.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 21:08:43 -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
>> Brian writes:
>>> I would argue that this is a problem with Firefox, not whatever video
>>> driver you're using. I've noticed that fixed background images really
>>> cause Firefox to choke, especially with smooth sc
Brian writes:
> I would argue that this is a problem with Firefox, not whatever video
> driver you're using. I've noticed that fixed background images really
> cause Firefox to choke, especially with smooth scrolling enabled
I wrote:
> That would explain why it works fine for me. I use smooth scr
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
A y2k-vintage Gateway VX1120 (Hitachi Diamondtron flat-screen CRT)
at 1280x1024 with GNOME & Metacity. (I see no reason to waste
resources on eye candy.)
Would you mind posting your xorg.conf? I have tried EXA and XAA options
to no avail. My desktop is a minimal Openbox a
John Hasler wrote:
Brian writes:
I would argue that this is a problem with Firefox, not whatever video
driver you're using. I've noticed that fixed background images really
cause Firefox to choke, especially with smooth scrolling enabled
That would explain why it works fine for me. I use smoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:43:06 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:55 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> > Thanks Brian, but I think I am gonna get myself an Nvidia-based
> > card :)
>
> I'd hold off on that if I
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:55 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Thanks Brian, but I think I am gonna get myself an Nvidia-based card :)
I'd hold off on that if I were you. ATI has recently opened their specs
and progress on those drivers is happening rapidly. The same cannot be
said for nVidia.
Brian writes:
> I would argue that this is a problem with Firefox, not whatever video
> driver you're using. I've noticed that fixed background images really
> cause Firefox to choke, especially with smooth scrolling enabled
That would explain why it works fine for me. I use smooth scrolling but
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:42:43 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/12/08 08:38, Brian Marshall wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:42:11 -0400
> > Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:53:45 -0400
> >> Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/08 08:38, Brian Marshall wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:42:11 -0400
> Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:53:45 -0400
>> Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Frank McCormick wrote:
>>>
Humm
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:42:11 -0400
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:53:45 -0400
> Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hummn.Tried both sites and they work well on my machine - the
> > > shame site does tend to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/08 06:42, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:53:45 -0400
> Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>>> Hummn.Tried both sites and they work well on my machine - the shame
>>> site does tend to dri
On 07/12/08 02:00, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> The "inner" scroll region? No sluggishness or slowdown. Noticeable
>> CPU usage by /usr/bin/X11/X when I rapidly jerk the scroll bar up
>> and down, but that's normal.
>>
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:53:45 -0400
Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> >
> > Hummn.Tried both sites and they work well on my machine - the shame
> > site does tend to drive up the cpu needle.
>
> Would you (or any
H.S. wrote:
.
Slows mine too. Mozzila Iceape browser 1.1.9-5, Debian Testing, 1.9 GHz
Pentium, 1.25 G RAM and using Nvidia driver from Unstable repositories
of Debian.
I'm running unstable as well with its current driver: 173.14.09 I'm
running one DVI panel (IBM L200P) at its native 1600x12
Ron Johnson wrote:
The "inner" scroll region? No sluggishness or slowdown. Noticeable
CPU usage by /usr/bin/X11/X when I rapidly jerk the scroll bar up
and down, but that's normal.
Are ya using
the NV or Nvidia driver?
Sorry. The
Bob Cox wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 22:53:45 -0400, Nick Lidakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
Hummn.Tried both sites and they work well on my machine - the shame site
does tend to drive up the cpu needle.
Would you (or anyone else, especially if you're using and Inte
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 22:53:45 -0400, Nick Lidakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>>
>> Hummn.Tried both sites and they work well on my machine - the shame site
>> does tend to drive up the cpu needle.
>
> Would you (or anyone else, especially if you're using and Intel
Nick Lidakis wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
Hummn.Tried both sites and they work well on my machine - the shame
site
does tend to drive up the cpu needle.
Would you (or anyone else, especially if you're using and Intel or
NVIDIA driver) mind trying this site?
http://www.tempus-vivit.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/08 23:08, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> I went to that page, but all I saw was a relatively simple web forum.
>>
>> NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE
>> Iceweasel 3.0-rc2
>>
>
> What about scrolling through the posts? And sluggishnes
Ron Johnson wrote:
I went to that page, but all I saw was a relatively simple web forum.
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE
Iceweasel 3.0-rc2
What about scrolling through the posts? And sluggishness? Are ya using
the NV or Nvidia driver?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/08 21:53, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>>
>> Hummn.Tried both sites and they work well on my machine - the shame
>> site
>> does tend to drive up the cpu needle.
>
> Would you (or anyone else, especially if you're using a
Nick Lidakis writes:
> Would you (or anyone else, especially if you're using and Intel or NVIDIA
> driver) mind trying this site?
> http://www.tempus-vivit.net/taverne/thema/935
Works fine here. Athlon 64, Geforce 6800.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Frank McCormick wrote:
Hummn.Tried both sites and they work well on my machine - the shame site
does tend to drive up the cpu needle.
Would you (or anyone else, especially if you're using and Intel or
NVIDIA driver) mind trying this site?
http://www.tempus-vivit.net/taverne/thema/935 Thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:50:42 -0400
Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> > Thanks Brian, but I think I am gonna get myself an Nvidia-based
> > card :)
>
> The NVIDIA card might not be any better. I have issues, with
Frank McCormick wrote:
Thanks Brian, but I think I am gonna get myself an Nvidia-based card :)
The NVIDIA card might not be any better. I have issues, with the
proprietary drivers, with slow scrolling using either a Quadro NVS 285
or a GTX 7800 on a 1600x1200 DVI panel. The open source dri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:45:45 -0400
Brian McKee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >> A couple of months ago someone here
> >> suggested I add "AccelMethod EXA" to my device
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:26:50 -0400
Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am running Sid on a dual-core 2.6 GHZ Pentium and I'm using the
> on-board video. My MB is an Intel DB865GBF. My monitor is a newer LDG
> LCD.
>
> Lately, it seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/08 11:52, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>
> I am running Sid on a dual-core 2.6 GHZ Pentium and I'm using the
> on-board video. My MB is an Intel DB865GBF. My monitor is a newer LDG LCD.
>
> Lately, it seems the past few weeks the video perfo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am running Sid on a dual-core 2.6 GHZ Pentium and I'm using the
on-board video. My MB is an Intel DB865GBF. My monitor is a newer LDG LCD.
Lately, it seems the past few weeks the video performance has deteriorated
- - - - it used to be quite fas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am running Sid on a dual-core 2.6 GHZ Pentium and I'm using the
on-board video. My MB is an Intel DB865GBF. My monitor is a newer LDG LCD.
Lately, it seems the past few weeks the video performance has deteriorated
- - it used to be quite fast b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am running Sid on a dual-core 2.6 GHZ Pentium and I'm using the
on-board video. My MB is an Intel DB865GBF. My monitor is a newer LDG LCD.
Lately, it seems the past few weeks the video performanc
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 16:22:51 -0300, Bruno Buys wrote:
> I don't know exactly when this started, but my debian notebook is slow
> on changing screens and programs. I alt+tab to switch programs and the
> screen takes a while to rebuild. I mean, its not like its obviously
> broken or buggy, but it
I don't know exactly when this started, but my debian notebook is slow
on changing screens and programs. I alt+tab to switch programs and the
screen takes a while to rebuild. I mean, its not like its obviously
broken or buggy, but its enough to annoy. I use kde, and noticed
non-kde programs do this
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:16:55PM +0200, Roman Brodylo wrote:
| Hello there,
|
| think I have a bug here, but I'm not sure.
Yeah, a memory leak like that is definitely a bug.
| I'm running testing and my system slows down to a near halt if it's been
| up and running for hours. Slows down meanin
38 matches
Mail list logo
