On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:56:28PM -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
> On Mar 27, 5:50 pm, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dave Stephenson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> >
>
> >
> > Did you do /etc/init/d/networking force-reload
> > after adding this to th interfaces file?
>
> "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 27, 4:00 pm, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I feel like I am missing something obvious.
> > >
> > > Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept
>
On Mar 27, 5:50 pm, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Stephenson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>
>
> Did you do /etc/init/d/networking force-reload
> after adding this to th interfaces file?
>
>
no, I just rebooted
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Stephenson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I feel like I am missing something obvious.
>
> here is my interfaces file:
>
>
> # The loopback network interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> # The primary network interface
> #allow-hotplug eth0
> #iface eth0 inet dhcp
"Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 27, 4:00 pm, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I feel like I am missing something obvious.
> >
> > Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept
> > variables? M
On Mar 27, 4:00 pm, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I feel like I am missing something obvious.
>
> Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept
> variables? Maybe $IFACE was meant to be replaced by the relevant
> int
"Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel like I am missing something obvious.
>
Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept
variables? Maybe $IFACE was meant to be replaced by the relevant
interface name.
HTH,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don
I feel like I am missing something obvious.
here is my interfaces file:
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
# The primary network interface
#allow-hotplug eth0
#iface eth0 inet dhcp
auto eth0
#force higher speed in spite of signal peak & dhcp
#mtu 1500
iface eth
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 12:43 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> MTU 1500 does indeed fix the speed problem, but I can't make it stick.
> When i reboot I get MTU 576 again. I presume DHCP is setting this
> somehow.
> I have searched around and have tried to put MTU in /etc/network/
>
Hello again,
MTU 1500 does indeed fix the speed problem, but I can't make it stick.
When i reboot I get MTU 576 again. I presume DHCP is setting this
somehow.
I have searched around and have tried to put MTU in /etc/network/
interfaces without success.
I have not been able to find an example clea
On Mar 25, 2:40 pm, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 22:17:35 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:24:25 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > > The network interface is integrated into the Asus M2N-e motherboard
>
> > > from lspci
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:35:11PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 22:17:35 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:24:25 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > The network interface is integrated into the Asus M2N-e motherboard
> > >
> >
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 22:17:35 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:24:25 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > The network interface is integrated into the Asus M2N-e motherboard
> >
> > from lspci:
> > 00:08.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP55 Ethernet (rev a2)
>
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:24:25 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
[...]
> The network interface is integrated into the Asus M2N-e motherboard
>
> from lspci:
> 00:08.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP55 Ethernet (rev a2)
>
> from ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:18:F3:86:8C:92
>
On Mar 24, 6:20 pm, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should probably start with your network card. You will get a list of
> your (PCI) hardware if you run the command "lspci" (without quotes) from
> a terminal or a console. Please do this and copy the line(s) which
> are related to n
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:11:18 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been running a current version of Etch for a few months. My
> internet download speeds are in the range of 10 - 15 kB/s. Until
> recently I blamed it on my ISP, SignalPeak, which has been having
> troubles, Rece
I have been having all sorts of problems lately in setting up a new box
with an AMD64 and Etch. BUT . slow speed networking aint one of
them in fact I was surprised at how fast it was compared with the
old workhorse machine it will eventually replace.
So ... sorry... but it looks as i
Hi all,
I have been running a current version of Etch for a few months. My
internet download speeds are in the range of 10 - 15 kB/s. Until
recently I blamed it on my ISP, SignalPeak, which has been having
troubles, Recently I noticed that the Windoz boxes on the same router
are getting speeds
18 matches
Mail list logo
