On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 09:39:29 -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> # grep startup /etc/default/shorewall
> # prevent startup with default configuration [Badly stated comment.]
> startup=1
>
> > And does 'systemctl status shorewall' show that it is enabled?
>
On 2/13/25 17:39, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
Roberto & all,
From: Roberto C. Sánchez
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:20:44 -0500
What about /etc/default/shorewall?
# grep startup /etc/default/shorewall
# prevent startup with default configuration [Badly stated comment.]
startup=1
Roberto & all,
From: Roberto C. Sánchez
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:20:44 -0500
> What about /etc/default/shorewall?
# grep startup /etc/default/shorewall
# prevent startup with default configuration [Badly stated comment.]
startup=1
> And does 'systemctl status shorewal
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> # cat /etc/deb*n
> 12.9
>
> # dpkg -l | grep shorewall
> ii shorewall5.2.8-2
> all Shoreline Firewall, netfilter configurator
> ii shorewall-core 5.2.8-2
>
* On 2025 13 Feb 10:10 -0600, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> # cat /etc/deb*n
> 12.9
>
> # dpkg -l | grep shorewall
> ii shorewall5.2.8-2
> all Shoreline Firewall, netfilter configurator
> ii shorewall-core
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 07:51:37AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> # cat /etc/deb*n
> 12.9
>
> # dpkg -l | grep shorewall
> ii shorewall5.2.8-2
> all Shoreline Firewall, netfilter configura
Hi,
# cat /etc/deb*n
12.9
# dpkg -l | grep shorewall
ii shorewall5.2.8-2
all Shoreline Firewall, netfilter configurator
ii shorewall-core 5.2.8-2
all Shorewall core components
ii shorewall-init
On Jo, 06 mai 21, 17:18:26, Charles Curley wrote:
>
> I will. I believe the Powers That Be at Debian prefer one file a bug
> report with Debian, and the Debian maintainers will file an upstream
> bug if necessary. Anyway, that's the course I plan to take.
Do feel free to file bugs directly with u
> >>
> >>
> >> Remember that Bullseye as nftables per default, you might want to
> >> switch back to iptables for Shorewall to work properly.
> >
> > Done, thank you.
> >
>
> :)
>
>
> > During this whole fiasco, I notic
s for Shorewall to work properly.
Done, thank you.
:)
During this whole fiasco, I noticed a problem with virtmanager. The
Bullseye version lets the user edit the XML. This is nice, because it
then applies whatever changes the user makes. However, as soon as you
hit the apply button, the disp
solution you like (this is
> documented in Libvirt's doc).
I missed it. Sorry.
>
>
> Remember that Bullseye as nftables per default, you might want to
> switch back to iptables for Shorewall to work properly.
Done, thank you.
During this whole fiasco, I noticed a problem with
On 5/6/2021 5:03 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
For years, up through Buster, I have had a nice setup with virtual
machines on my laptops, with firewalling provided by shorewall and
rules I have added over the years. As I move from network to network,
the firewall is reconfigured, and the VMs
For years, up through Buster, I have had a nice setup with virtual
machines on my laptops, with firewalling provided by shorewall and
rules I have added over the years. As I move from network to network,
the firewall is reconfigured, and the VMs continue to work. I also have
scripts that detect my
On 04/28/2014 07:15 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
I'm running a Jessie/ Sid mixture and after a recent dist-upgrade Shorewall
blocks
all Internet access unless it is 'stopped' and restarted:
When shorewall is started, it sets the iptables in the kernel which do
the actual work
I'm running a Jessie/ Sid mixture and after a recent dist-upgrade Shorewall
blocks
all Internet access unless it is 'stopped' and restarted:
root@mundo:/home/charles# shorewall stop
Stopping Shorewall
Processing /etc/shorewall/stop ...
Processing /etc/shorewall/tcclear ..
Ulrik Haugen wrote:
> When I boot my machine something like the following is printed:
I don't know. But there haven't been any other responses for several
days. So I will make a comment.
> [ 50.220571] xt_addrtype: ipv6 does not support BROADCAST matching
> Starting "
Hello!
When I boot my machine something like the following is printed:
[ 50.220571] xt_addrtype: ipv6 does not support BROADCAST matching
Starting "Shorewall firewall": not done.
Starting "Shorewall6 firewall": not done.
[FAIL] startpar: service(s) returned failure:
ce everything is working, does "shorewall restart" give
> the delay?
No, it does not. I see in the /var/log/shorewall-init.log file that on each
machine a 1 minute delay occurs:
Aug 19 18:07:03 Creating iptables-restore input...
Aug 19 18:07:03 Shorewall configuration compiled to /var
If an earlier copy of this message reached the list,
it's References are absent.
From: Nate Bargmann
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:22:15 -0500
> Each machine is defined for its own fw zone.
If both machines have the delay, troubleshooting on
the wired machine should be more efficient that on
From: Nate Bargmann
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:22:15 -0500
> Each machine is defined for its own fw zone. I do not have a DMZ. The
> machines do sit behind a OpenWRT router with its firewall enabled.
Once everything is working, does "shorewall restart" give
the delay?
The
x27;t suggesting that you were using nis. I was simply pointing
that out as a data point where using 'auto' avoids a delay but
'allow-hotplug' has a problem. It was an example only.
> I suppose the next step is figuring out how to enable debugging in
> Shorewall. Si
Camaleón, I accidentally deleted your reply.
Perhaps the only difference I can see with the FAQ you quoted is that
it's for the much older version 3.0. That has not been in
Unstable/Testing for some time. Currently, the Shorewall packages are
at 4.5.5-1. I'll double check for any
. I do not have a DMZ. The
machines do sit behind a OpenWRT router with its firewall enabled.
> > ... the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause
> > of about a minute before the system start/shutdown can continue.
>
> By any chance, does fw have another connection w
* On 2012 21 Aug 14:56 -0500, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > This has bugged me on and off most of this year since for some reason
> > that I can't find, the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause
> > of about a minute before the system start/shu
From: Nate Bargmann
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:35:57 -0500
> Right now this affects both my desktop and laptop running Sid.
Is the desktop the fw zone? Another machine?
> ... the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause
> of about a minute before the system start/shu
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> This has bugged me on and off most of this year since for some reason
> that I can't find, the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause
> of about a minute before the system start/shutdown can continue. Right
> now this affects both my desktop a
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:35:57 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> This has bugged me on and off most of this year since for some reason
> that I can't find, the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause
> of about a minute before the system start/shutdown can continue. Right
>
This has bugged me on and off most of this year since for some reason
that I can't find, the shorewall/shorewall6 startup scripts have a pause
of about a minute before the system start/shutdown can continue. Right
now this affects both my desktop and laptop running Sid.
My desktop'
> That you can provide such detail and yet not use the tool yourself.
>
> Hugo
> >> Do you run shorewall?
> >
> > Not at all.
Hugo, despite being complex in appearance shorewall is 'easy' to set up for a
strong
firewall with example files provided
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:13:10 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>>>> Mmm, this is done from "/etc/default/shorewall" by editing the
>>>> "startup" variable, that you have to set to "1" as it says.
>>>>
>>>>
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:43:53 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 29 apr 12, 18:53:11, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>>
>> In /doc/shorewall-core there's nothing about this In
>> /doc/shorewall-doc/ there are subfolders of HTML and HTML/images and
>> manpages in great
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:13:36 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the
command
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:13:36 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>>
>>> After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
>>> configuration files, Shorewall now only starts '
On Du, 29 apr 12, 18:53:11, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
> In /doc/shorewall-core there's nothing about this
> In /doc/shorewall-doc/ there are subfolders of HTML and HTML/images and
> manpages in great abundance but no README.
> In /usr/share/shorewall there are subfolders of
Brian pointed out:
> Incidentally, shorewall has had 'startup=0' since Lenny at least. You
> probably forgot that you must have altered the default sometime in the
> past and didn't think the README in /usr/share/doc worth a glance.
> Also, /etc/default/shorewall is
On Sun 29 Apr 2012 at 15:30:28 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 22:20:02 +0200
> hvw59601 wrote:
>
> > Camaleón wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> > >
> > >> After the recent
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 22:20:02 +0200
hvw59601 wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> >
> >> After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
> >> configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'm
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:30:02 +0200
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
> > After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
> > configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command
>
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command
line: e.g. #shorewall start.
I can't find where this problem can
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
> configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command
> line: e.g. #shorewall start.
>
> I can't find where this problem
After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous configuration
files,
Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command line: e.g. #shorewall start.
I can't find where this problem can be corrected in the
etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
What changed in the upgrade th
onnections, not MAKE connections.
>
> Shorewall is not just a firewall (frontend), it can be used to activate
> the NAT, via the:
>
> IP_FORWARDING=On
>
> option in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. It defaults to 'keep', but it's
> very convenient to use if you already
On Jo, 03 mar 11, 22:08:00, Jason Hsu wrote:
>
> What's going on? How can turning OFF a firewall block Internet
> access? I thought that the purpose of a firewall is to BLOCK
> connections, not MAKE connections.
Shorewall is not just a firewall (frontend), it can be used to
On 03/04/2011 10:42 AM, Jason Hsu wrote:
I tried "shorewall clear", but that also disabled my Internet connection.
Again, I had to start Shorewall up again to restore my Internte connection.
Then it is as Stan had said, stopping shorewall disables your NATing as
well. Follow his
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:51:13 +0530
Mihira Fernando wrote:
> >
> How are you stoping shorewall ? if you issue a shorewall stop, it goes
> in to a lockdown mode. You have to issue a shorewall clear to allow all
> traffic.
>
I tried "shorewall clear", but that also dis
Jason Hsu put forth on 3/3/2011 10:08 PM:
> My setup:
> Modem -> Firewall/server computer -> Ethernet switch -> Main computer
>
> The firewall/server computer has Shorewall (firewall), DNSMasq, DHCP3 Server,
> and SSH.
>
> I'm trying to troubleshoot why I
On 03/04/2011 09:38 AM, Jason Hsu wrote:
My setup:
Modem -> Firewall/server computer -> Ethernet switch -> Main computer
The firewall/server computer has Shorewall (firewall), DNSMasq, DHCP3 Server,
and SSH.
I'm trying to troubleshoot why I'm unable to connect to my n
My setup:
Modem -> Firewall/server computer -> Ethernet switch -> Main computer
The firewall/server computer has Shorewall (firewall), DNSMasq, DHCP3 Server,
and SSH.
I'm trying to troubleshoot why I'm unable to connect to my network from another
location by using SSH.
Paul Cartwright schreef:
On 02/14/2011 06:09 AM, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
A copy to the list for the archive
ok, I see what I was doing wrong. In Eudora, CTRL-R is reply, it replies
to the person. CTRL-SHFT-L replies to THE LIST..
I didn't realize Eudora had that function.
No problem. And a d
On 02/14/2011 06:09 AM, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
A copy to the list for the archive
ok, I see what I was doing wrong. In Eudora, CTRL-R is reply, it replies
to the person. CTRL-SHFT-L replies to THE LIST..
I didn't realize Eudora had that function.
--
Paul Cartwright
On 02/14/2011 06:09 AM, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
A copy to the list for the archive
I need to change that default from replying to the user, to replying to
the list.. I normally highlight what I want to reply to & hit CTRL-R.
There is probably a way to change that in Eudora OSE, I'll just have t
/var/log/messages on the desktop to see if any blocked traffic has
been logged.
thanks,
I knew it was a shorewall problem, because ssh works, and apache worked
after I added the port 81.. My ISP put in a new ADSL modem/router that I
have no admin rights on, so I am not sure what gets in from
Paul Cartwright schreef:
I was having a problem today, trying my laptop & IMAP from my debian
desktop. I looked in the rules file, & figured out why my web server
wasn't working. It only showed port 80, but I had changed apache to port
81, forgetting about shorewall! When I saw t
I was having a problem today, trying my laptop & IMAP from my debian
desktop. I looked in the rules file, & figured out why my web server
wasn't working. It only showed port 80, but I had changed apache to port
81, forgetting about shorewall! When I saw the port 80 in there, I
cha
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 06:48:01PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
> On 10/16/2010 03:37 PM, lee wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >is it possible to implement adaptive traffic shaping with shorewall?
>
> Yes by using HTB with the traffic shaper:
> http://www.shorewall.net/traffic_shapi
On 10/16/2010 03:37 PM, lee wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to implement adaptive traffic shaping with shorewall?
What I have in mind is, for example, to be able to specify that
outgoing ftp traffic shouldn´t use more than 1/4 of the total
bandwidth if the other 3/4 of it are used otherwise. When
Hi,
is it possible to implement adaptive traffic shaping with shorewall?
What I have in mind is, for example, to be able to specify that
outgoing ftp traffic shouldn´t use more than 1/4 of the total
bandwidth if the other 3/4 of it are used otherwise. When there´s free
bandwidth, the outgoing
At Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:18:38 -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote,
"Also, do you get the error:
touch: cannot touch `/var/lock/subsys/shorewall': No such file or directory
"
Ref. man shorewall.conf.
Appears that a recent update intended to
replace the lock /var/lock/subsys/shor
Hi,
I didn't find anything for immediate use to tabulate occurrences in
shorewall ulog files and so I wrote the below script after doing
similarly on the command line. I needed it to focus in on behavior that
showed up at a higher level. I offer it below for general use via GPL. I
believe
Hi,
I didn't find anything for immediate use to tabulate occurrences in
shorewall ulog files and so I wrote the below script after doing
similarly on the command line. I needed it to focus in on behavior that
showed up at a higher level. I offer it below for general use via GPL. I
believe
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:47:36AM -0800, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
> well well well
> it works...
>
> then, how can i use 10.1.1.4 for DNS as well?
> putting:
> DNS/ACCEPT ALL ALLon rules didnt have any effect, cant resolve DNS
> is there anyway i can make the debian for local DNS reso
unawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "debian-user@lists.debian.org"
Sent: Thursday, 27 November, 2008 2:19:12 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: shorewall newbie Revisit: new IP
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 16:07 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
>
> using 10.1.1.5, gw/dns = 10.1.1.4
You have
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 16:07 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
>
> using 10.1.1.5, gw/dns = 10.1.1.4
You have a DNS on 10.1.1.4?
> C:\>ping www.yahoo.com
> Ping request could not find host www.yahoo.com. Please check the name
> and try again.
No DNS on 10.1.1.4, so the ip of www.yahoo.com can n
via 10.20.20.106 dev ppp0
> shorewall start
> shorewall status
Shorewall-4.0.14 Status at debian - Thu Nov 27 13:58:42 EST 2008
Shorewall is running
State:Started (Thu Nov 27 13:46:29 EST 2008)
using 10.1.1.5, gw/dns = 10.1.1.4
C:\>ping 220.244.8.194
Pinging 220.244.8.194 with
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 13:41 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
> > route -n
> Destination GatewayGenmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
> 10.20.20.125 0.0.0.0255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1
> 10.0.0.
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 02:54, Tom Allison wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Tue,25.Nov.08, 06:04:52, Tom Allison wrote:
> >> I too am trying to set-up Shorewall as a firewall box.
> >> And I ran into some peculiar problems that are related to shorewall
> &
;
> > I'll have to go back and RTFM.
>
> Some time ago I posted a tutorial for masquerading with shorewall. Let's
> see... it's still there
>
> http://newbiedoc.berlios.de/wiki/Firewall_with_masquerading
I run shorwall between my dial-up modem and the rest of my net
0 00 eth1
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth0
> pppoe start
> shorewall start
(after ppp0 up and same result after firing up shorewall)
> route -n
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
10.20.20.12
On Tue,25.Nov.08, 22:59:24, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
> Hi There,
>
> As suggested, I change the IP for eth1, but unfortunately, still same result,
> but I hope to get a light this time
> On Policy, I simply put "ALL ALL ACCEPT" just for a starter, to get thi
and. I have tried with "/sbin/shorewall" but it doesn't
> works.
Please post *exactly* what you have in /etc/sudoers and the exact error
message you get (use copy-paste).
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert E
ried to set this up against the ISP and it could not identify
> any dhcp traffic and only rejected everything as being a martian.
> Seriously broken?
>
> I'll have to go back and RTFM.
Some time ago I posted a tutorial for masquerading with shorewall. Let's
see.
Hi There,
As suggested, I change the IP for eth1, but unfortunately, still same result,
but I hope to get a light this time
On Policy, I simply put "ALL ALL ACCEPT" just for a starter, to get this
shorewall working is my priority
Why i am not simply put net.ipv4.ip_forward=1, I w
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 07:54:30PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Tue,25.Nov.08, 06:04:52, Tom Allison wrote:
>>> I too am trying to set-up Shorewall as a firewall box.
>>> And I ran into some peculiar problems that are related to shorewall
>&
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Tue,25.Nov.08, 06:04:52, Tom Allison wrote:
I too am trying to set-up Shorewall as a firewall box.
And I ran into some peculiar problems that are related to shorewall
and not related to shorewall.
right now I'm trying to get the firewall interfaces to come up o
Thank you very much, i already know how to use sudoers, but i am not
sure about what commands i could change for allowing sudo and working
perfectly. I can't change sudoers by simply adding my user, i need a
specific command. I have tried with "/sbin/shorewall" but it doesn't
w
On Tue,25.Nov.08, 06:04:52, Tom Allison wrote:
> I too am trying to set-up Shorewall as a firewall box.
> And I ran into some peculiar problems that are related to shorewall
> and not related to shorewall.
>
> right now I'm trying to get the firewall interfaces to come up o
On Mon,24.Nov.08, 18:50:38, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I got a problem setting up Shorewall under Debian, hope if someone can guide
> me here...
...
> Policy
> $FWnetACCEPT
> $FWlocACCEPT
> net$FWACCEPT
> n
ork :(
>
> Cheers
As some other posters pointed out I think the problem may very well be
'routing' and not necessarily just the firewall. My message indicated to read
through _all_ the docs not just those two 'related' topics. For instance this
doc is really helpful
I too am trying to set-up Shorewall as a firewall box.
And I ran into some peculiar problems that are related to shorewall
and not related to shorewall.
right now I'm trying to get the firewall interfaces to come up on the
same network. So eth0 and eth1 are both on 192.168.1.0/24 with eth1
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 08:44 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
> netstat -atn
>
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:1 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:113 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN
> tcp0 0 0
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 07:00 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
> Just to clear up bit mis-understanding
> I did not put same IP on eth0 and eth1, they 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.4
> But both did reside on the same subnet: 255.0.0.0
> With this scenario, I assume you corrected me by saying this
> configura
:22 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Shorewall with Debian
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 07:00 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
> Just to clear up bit mis-understanding
> I did not put same IP on eth0 and eth1, they 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.4
> But both did reside on the same subnet: 255.0.0.0
> With this s
er, 2008 4:46:45 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Shorewall with Debian
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 06:36 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply,
>
> I admit, yes, it was mistake to create both NIC on the same subnet,
> though I need to study more about this
>
> 'ping 1
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 06:36 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply,
>
> I admit, yes, it was mistake to create both NIC on the same subnet,
> though I need to study more about this
>
> 'ping 10.1.1.5' on my Debian
> - with eth0 only, resulting: From 10.1.1.4 icmp_seq=10 Destina
1.1.5)
why is that?
Thanks
- Original Message
From: subscriptions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Phillipus Gunawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2008 3:17:31 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Shorewall with Debian
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 04:58 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
>
>
> Checked:
> IP_FORWARDING=On
>
> Another things that bothering me
> I am using class A network as 10.1.1.x/24, subnet 255.0.0.0
>
> ~# ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:4C:50:18:FD
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2008 2:47:14 PM
Subject: Re: Shorewall with Debian
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Phillipus Gunawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I got a problem setting up Shorewal
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Phillipus Gunawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I got a problem setting up Shorewall under Debian, hope if someone can guide
> me here...
>
> Problem 1
>
> I install Debian with e
Hi There,
I got a problem setting up Shorewall under Debian, hope if someone can guide me
here...
Problem 1
I install Debian with eth2 plugged
When Im using eth2, I can log in to my box (using webmin) to configure the
debian either using 10.1.1.1 or 10.1.1.4 address remotely from other hosts
> >
> > > > I did a google search and this is basically a state file written by
> > > > shorewall to indicate a successful start up. Should I just create this
> > > > file?
> > >
> > > How did you install shorewall?
> > >
&g
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:24:26 +1200
Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I don't have shorewall-perl installed so have no knowledge on that.
> Why shorewall-perl?
The author seems to prefer it; from Shorewall-perl.html (in
shorewall-doc):
Shorewall-perl - What
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:13:09PM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> > no /var/lock/subsys/ directory.
> >
>
> You are right, I don't have that directory either.
>
> > > I did a google search and this is basically a state file written by
> > >
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:02:34 +1200
Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 10:18:38AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> > Yes, shorewall is very powerful!
> >
> > Also, do you get the error:
> >
> > touch: cannot touch `/var/
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 10:18:38AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Yes, shorewall is very powerful!
>
> Also, do you get the error:
>
> touch: cannot touch `/var/lock/subsys/shorewall': No such file or
> directory done.
I'm running shorewall and that file doesn&#
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:06:24 +0300
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [I have wrapped all your lines to less than 80 characters]
>
> On Sat,20.Sep.08, 00:38:11, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> >
> > Following the setup for shorewall firewall I was able to get it
[I have wrapped all your lines to less than 80 characters]
On Sat,20.Sep.08, 00:38:11, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>
> Following the setup for shorewall firewall I was able to get it up and
> running for the eth1 interface (local wired RJ45). Now, I would also
> like to setup my wire
Following the setup for shorewall firewall I was able to get it up and running
for the eth1 interface (local wired RJ45). Now, I would also like to setup my
wireless adapter with shorewall (eth0). How is this done?
Is it as simple as adding:
net eth0 detect dhcp,tcpflags,logmartians,nosmurfs
his computer is
> > running the Shorewall Firewall. Everything seemed to be working OK till we
> > tried to ping the server.
> >
> > The firewall is set to let in pings every second:
> > >From "rules" file inside shorewall - this has always wo
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 16:41, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We just did an upgrade on one of our etch servers. It installed a bunch
> of new updates including a kernel-image 2.6.18-6-k7. This computer is
> running the Shorewall Firewall. Everything seemed t
Hello,
We just did an upgrade on one of our etch servers. It installed a bunch
of new updates including a kernel-image 2.6.18-6-k7. This computer is
running the Shorewall Firewall. Everything seemed to be working OK till we
tried to ping the server.
The firewall is set to let in pings every
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
