http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/11/msg00679.html
On every startup, on the initial {black screen, white text} I get
errors beginning with
> Mount point '/run' does not exist. Skipping mount.
and ending (just before it goes to X) with many (10 > n > 100) lines
beg
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:22:40PM +1100, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Tom Roche wrote:
>
> >
> > What must one do to make /run mount appropriately on startup if one has
> > a separate /var partition? What I mean, why I ask:
> >
> > I suspect this is related to having a
You're quasi running Sid, this explains that you could run into trouble.
Some software does expect:
spinymouse@qrc:~$ df -hl | grep run
tmpfs 741M 944K 740M 1% /run
none5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
none1.9G 0 1.9G 0% /run/shm
none100M
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Tom Roche wrote:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/11/msg00679.html
> >> On every startup, on the initial {black screen, white text} I get
> >> errors beginning with
>
> >> > Mount point '/run' does not exist. Skipping mount.
>
> >> and ending (just bef
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/11/msg00679.html
>> On every startup, on the initial {black screen, white text} I get
>> errors beginning with
>> > Mount point '/run' does not exist. Skipping mount.
>> and ending (just before it goes to X) with many (10 > n > 100) lines
>> beginning wit
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:22:40 +1100
Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Since /run is meant to replace all temporary filesystems in RAM I
> would expect this to be other way around, ie /var/run to be symlinked
> to /run. So /run should be a tmpfs and /run/shm and /run/lock part of
> it. Also /dev/shm should ne s
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Tom Roche wrote:
>
> What must one do to make /run mount appropriately on startup if one has
> a separate /var partition? What I mean, why I ask:
>
> Awhile ago, I got a new box with win7 preinstalled. I repartitioned,
> adding separate partitions for swap, /, /bo
PS:
> > I suspect this is related to having a separate /var partition,
> > since, once the box is booted and I'm logged in, I see that
Yes, it is related. A known issue for the transition.
While I know this from Arch Linux I found a link in German regarding
to Debian:
The Germany words describe
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:47:12 -0500
Tom Roche wrote:
>
> What must one do to make /run mount appropriately on startup if one
> has a separate /var partition? What I mean, why I ask:
>
> Awhile ago, I got a new box with win7 preinstalled. I repartitioned,
> adding separate partitions for swap, /,
What must one do to make /run mount appropriately on startup if one has
a separate /var partition? What I mean, why I ask:
Awhile ago, I got a new box with win7 preinstalled. I repartitioned,
adding separate partitions for swap, /, /boot, /home, /tmp, /usr, /var
(in addition to the win7 partition
Hello:
I just installed micropolis (the GPL-licensed version of SimCity), but
when I invoke it, it reports 'Darn, X display ":0" doesn't support the
shared memory extension.' Then it just sits there, frozen and
unresponsive. xdpyinfo reports that MIT-SHM, which I unders
I installed mono asp.net server by apt-get install mono-xsp2
libapache2-mod-mono asp.net2-examples
after that when i restart apache2, it failed
# /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
Restarting web server: apache2[Sun Jul 13 16:29:23 2008] [crit]
(17)File exists: Failed to create shared memory segment for
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 03:39:28PM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>
> QUESTIONS:
> 1) How to set shmmax in debian?
Look in /proc/sys/kernel ... there are several shared memory parameters
there.
[Not sure about the rest]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
On Saturday, 07.04.2007 at 14:02 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 18:53 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > On Saturday, 07.04.2007 at 12:08 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 16:06 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > > > On Friday, 06.04.2007 at 15:39 -0700, Francesco
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 18:53 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Saturday, 07.04.2007 at 12:08 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 16:06 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > > On Friday, 06.04.2007 at 15:39 -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1) How to set shmmax in debian?
> > >
>
On Saturday, 07.04.2007 at 12:08 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 16:06 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > On Friday, 06.04.2007 at 15:39 -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> >
> > > 1) How to set shmmax in debian?
> >
> > For the running kernel, echo a value to /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax
tried to be allocated in the future i the MD
> simulations I am carrying out).
Pretty hefty hardware. Settings below.
> 3)What else - if anything - should be set besides
> shmmax.
Explanation
kernel.shmall
is the available memory for shared memory in 4K pages
kernel.shmmax
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 16:06 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Friday, 06.04.2007 at 15:39 -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>
> > 1) How to set shmmax in debian?
>
> For the running kernel, echo a value to /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax - to
> make it a permanent setting (i.e. set automatically at subsequent
On Friday, 06.04.2007 at 15:39 -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> 1) How to set shmmax in debian?
For the running kernel, echo a value to /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax - to
make it a permanent setting (i.e. set automatically at subsequent
reboots), include the setting in /etc/sysctl.conf:
kernel.shmmax
My quantum mechanical computational software (running
on amd64 etch with 3700mb per node, total ram 16GB) is
implicitly using shared memory segments to speed up
transfer outside the kernel. It is unable to allocate
a 38731776bytes segment, and the computation dies.
In fact, command "ipc
What's wrong with SHM which has 0x key, shmid 20217856 ? Why
can't be removed ?
#ipcs -m
------ Shared Memory Segments
keyshmid owner perms bytes nattch status
0x 20217856 user1 66616 3 dest
0x
s counts -- which is probably
meaningless (since you can't add up a bunch of processes' shared
memory because it's, well shared).
The program displays the /proc//smaps info for all processes
padded and then shows totals. I've clipped all output except for two
pids and the tot
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:50:20AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>>That is true whether or not the binary is statically linked.
>
>
> Sure, but the grand parent post specifically asked about statically
> linked binaries.
>
>
>>The important thing is that libra
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:50:20AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> That is true whether or not the binary is statically linked.
Sure, but the grand parent post specifically asked about statically
linked binaries.
> The important thing is that library code is not shared.
You stated ``If they
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:11:53AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>>If they are statically, linked, then they don't share their library
>>code. Ergo, you are wasting memory.
>
>
> Multiple processes of the same statically linked executable will share
> their tex
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:11:53AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> If they are statically, linked, then they don't share their library
> code. Ergo, you are wasting memory.
Multiple processes of the same statically linked executable will share
their text pages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Bill Moseley wrote:
> Also, ps is always showing the UID # instead of the name. Shouldn't
> that come from /etc/passwd?
>
> $ fgrep 112 /etc/passwd
> subversion:x:112:112:subversion:/var/lib/projects:/bin/sh
$ printf subversion | wc -c
10
ps displays the uid because the user name is longer than
Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:07:17PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>>http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/06/120210&from=rss
>
>
> What happens with statically linked binaries?
>
> I've got about 25 Mysql processes that look like this in pmap -d:
>
> mapped: 1
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:07:17PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/06/120210&from=rss
What happens with statically linked binaries?
I've got about 25 Mysql processes that look like this in pmap -d:
mapped: 148116Kwriteable/private: 140952K
Bill Moseley wrote:
> Top shows shared memory, but I'm not clear how to read shared memory
> with ps. I'm curious how much total memory these Apache process are
> using -- and how much is shared between the processes.
>
> Does RSS include memory that might be sh
Top shows shared memory, but I'm not clear how to read shared memory
with ps. I'm curious how much total memory these Apache process are
using -- and how much is shared between the processes.
Does RSS include memory that might be shared with other processes?
$ ps --ppid 29903 -F
UID
On Sunday 01 January 2006 08:20 pm, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Jan 01 2006, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> > How to dispense with it?
>
> Do you possibly have anything like ecb, semantic, eieio, speedbar-*,
> cedet-* installed in your machine? If you don't have any use for them,
> I'd suggest you to uninst
On Jan 01 2006, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> ede-speedbar semantic-idle
>
> flash by in the minibuffer. What in the world is that?
Those are packages packages for development of large programs. You can
learn more if you search google for cedet or ecb.
> How to dispense with it?
Do you possibly have a
OOps: The problem was that emacs was doing a reverse dns lookup or something.
The clue was "10 seconds".
As soon as I put the hostname and ip in /etc/hosts emacs went back to
immediate.
I have never been able to configure a local caching dns server on debian with
bind. I dont know how, desp
Hi,
I use emacs routinely as my editor.
(I like vi too...
I actually wrote my phd thesis using vi on a vax 11-750 over a 1200 baud modem
(... maybe 300 baud ?) :) )
Emacs startup has gotten much slower once I changed some memory settings. No
xserver memory issues as X is not running. Just pla
7;m getting:
> [Mon Sep 13 12:11:36 2004] [error] Cannot allocate shared memory:
> (17)File exist
> File exist, what file?
> I can't start or restart apache2!
i ran into this problem last week, but i can't completely track down
the file involved now.
initially, i used ipcs(8
mporary DH
parameters (512/ 1024 bits)
[Mon Sep 13 12:11:36 2004] [error] Cannot allocate shared memory:
(17)File exist
File exist, what file?
I can't start or restart apache2!
thanks in advance.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipermail/serusers/2004-February/005966.html in
> extract form
>
> Desc: ser won't run on linux kernels <2.4 (fails with EINVAL when
> intializing the shared memory)
Until you've verified that you're indeed using a 2.4.x kernel, this is
most likely your pr
absolutely fine.
I did a dpkg -i of the
latest stable version of Debian distro
of SER ie
ser_0.8.12_i386.deb, sourced from iptel.org website. Should have started
but got the error message of Too much shared memory
demanded. I tried using
command to use less memory seems it uses 32 Meg as per
help from
Hi Alexandru,
you wrote :
> my debian box running kernel 2.4.21 with a NVIDIA GeForece2MX TwinView card
> and XFree86 4.3.0
> won't start X after the installation of the nvidia driver
1) if you use proprietary driver from nvidia, complain to them.
i think there is also a non-proprietar
thread...
cheers, paul
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 07:51, Joachim Smit wrote:
> After compiling a new kernel I can't start postgresql anymore because of an
> IpcMemoryCreate-error.
>
> This is the solution: "You either do not have shared memory configured
> properly in y
After compiling a new kernel I can't start postgresql anymore because of an
IpcMemoryCreate-error.
This is the solution: "You either do not have shared memory configured
properly in your kernel or you need to enlarge the shared memory available
in the kernel"
How do I do
n a nvidia ferebsd faq:
Q: X crashes during `startx`, and my XFree86.0.log file contains this error message:
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to obtain a shared memory identifier.
A: The NVIDIA OpenGL driver and the NVIDIA X driver require shared memory to
communicate; you must have:
a) SYS
Hello
Does anybody know if there is a open source library which provides dynmic
memory in conjunction with shared memory allocated using shmget/shmat? I
want to allocate some shared memory and then later dynamically create some
buffers also in shared memory. It seems that I will have to have an
mounting it you can use shared memory.
>
> Do it:
> $ mkdir /var/shm
/dev/shm
> and add a line to /etc/fstab:
>
> none/var/shm shm defaults 0 0
/dev/shm
it can be anywhere, but /dev is really a much more correct place for
this.
--
Eth
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:14:34PM -0800, Calyth wrote:
> As you bring this up I do notice that it happens on my machine too.
Answer is - 2.4.0 has new filesystem (why? I don't know) and whithout
mounting it you can use shared memory.
Do it:
$ mkdir /var/shm
and add a line to /e
great info, but ... how can i see the 'actual' memory use when running 2.4.0
?
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Amal Phadke
Cc: Debian User List
Subject: Re: 2.4.0 and shared memory
-BEGIN
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Amal Phadke wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>I am using Potato with 2.4.0 right now. I have noticed that 'free'
> command now reports 0 shared memory and 0 swap usage. With kernel
> 2.2.18, it used to report few megabytes of shared memory. My box has
> h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi all,
>
>I am using Potato with 2.4.0 right now. I have noticed that 'free'
> command now reports 0 shared memory and 0 swap usage. With kernel
> 2.2.
As you bring this up I do notice that it happens on my machine too.
I've use 2.4.0 test10 and now 2.4.0, and swap is 0, and shared is 0.
My machine has 384M ram.
Calyth
Hi all,
I am using Potato with 2.4.0 right now. I have noticed that 'free'
command now reports 0 shared memory and 0 swap usage. With kernel
2.2.18, it used to report few megabytes of shared memory. My box has
half a gig of RAM, but when I was using 2.2.18 kernel, the system used
at
> Harry Henry Gebel writes:
hhg> The mode is NOT seen as security enough. The private key is
hhg> encrypted using a symmetrical cipher whose key is derived
hhg> from a hash of the passphrase. (the exact cipher and hash can
hhg> be specified in an S2K block in the secret keyring
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 09:03:57PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:57:53PM -0500, Harry Henry Gebel ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:09:26PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
> > > > "kmself" == kmself writes:
> > > >> You're probably ri
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 09:01:50PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> I did:
>
> gpg --armor --export-secret-keys kmself
>
> ...which did just that, without prompting for a passphrase. I think you
> may be right about that. Hmmm Still, the key doesn't work without
> the passphrase,
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:57:53PM -0500, Harry Henry Gebel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:09:26PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
> > > "kmself" == kmself writes:
> > >> You're probably right about this (IANA security expert), but
> > >> these should only be reada
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:09:26PM -0500, Chris Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > "kmself" == kmself writes:
>
> >> You're probably right about this (IANA security expert), but
> >> these should only be readable by root. Also, if you have a
> >> malicious root, your private k
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:09:26PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
> > "kmself" == kmself writes:
> >> You're probably right about this (IANA security expert), but
> >> these should only be readable by root. Also, if you have a
> >> malicious root, your private key isn't going to be al
> "kmself" == kmself writes:
>> You're probably right about this (IANA security expert), but
>> these should only be readable by root. Also, if you have a
>> malicious root, your private key isn't going to be all that
>> safe anyway.
kmself> Well, on disk, your private
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 07:09:02PM -0500, Chris Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > "kmself" == kmself writes:
>
> >> The other root programs shouldn't be looking at memory other
> >> than their own, or else they'd segfault. The major thing with
> >> memory-locking is that the
> "kmself" == kmself writes:
>> The other root programs shouldn't be looking at memory other
>> than their own, or else they'd segfault. The major thing with
>> memory-locking is that the memory never gets written to disk.
kmself> What about /proc/kcore or /dev/mem?
You'r
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Chris Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > "kmself" == kmself writes:
>
> kmself> I'd also confirmed this on another box. Though I can
> kmself> never remember what the [EMAIL PROTECTED]&*() mode bit is for
> SUID.
> kmself> '4577' was w
> "kmself" == kmself writes:
kmself> I'd also confirmed this on another box. Though I can
kmself> never remember what the [EMAIL PROTECTED]&*() mode bit is for SUID.
kmself> '4577' was what I was looking for, IIRC.
4755. Though you should probably use suidregister (see
/var/li
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 09:28:59PM +, Adam Langley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 12:05:58PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > Response redirected to list.
> > Follow-up set to list.
>
> Yea, sorry. I would suggest that the list set Reply-To, but I'd just
> get flam
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 12:05:58PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Response redirected to list.
> Follow-up set to list.
Yea, sorry. I would suggest that the list set Reply-To, but I'd just get flamed
> > It depends on how much you trust gnupg. Setting it SUID means that is
> > can lock page
Response redirected to list.
Follow-up set to list.
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 07:25:49PM +, Adam Langley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:50:23AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > I'd been getting the "Warning: using shared memory" mess
I'd been getting the "Warning: using shared memory" message from gpg
since a system upgrade yesterday. Checking, I found that gpg was not
set SUID.
I've set the SUID bit, but am wondering why this changed. I can't find
any notes about setting gnupg non-SUID in any of
how to know from a running binary kernel the parameters for semaphores
and shared memory?
how to know parameters who have default kernels ?
thanks,
jaume
Joseph de los Santos posts:
> My question is.. how do I enable this MIT/SHM shared memory?
>
If you are using the latest kernel, version 2.3.51 or above; to enable
shm you have to add the line
none /var/shmshm defaults 0 0
in your /etc/fsta
> > hi,
> > whenever I login to X windows I get a warning that either I am running
> > enlightenment over a network connection (which I'm not) or an X server that
> > does not support shared memory in my lmlib configuration. My question
> > is..how do I enable
:: On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:31:15 PDT, "Joseph de los Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> hi,
> whenever I login to X windows I get a warning that either I am running
> enlightenment over a network connection (which I'm not) or an X server that
> does not
hi,
whenever I login to X windows I get a warning that either I am running
enlightenment over a network connection (which I'm not) or an X server that
does not support shared memory in my lmlib configuration. My question
is..how do I enable this MIT/SHM shared m
: 66788, status=0xff, nxpg=0x0
Apparently this is a shared memory problem common among PCI machines that
are not configured to map in ISA memory devices. Threfore, you end up
reading the PC's RAM (all 0xff values) instead of the RAM on the card that
contains the data from the received packet.
I a
9788
>
> I noticed it because i ran xosview and noticed that most of the
> used memory was on "shared".
xosview doesn't print shared memory properly - the author was unsure
what it meant when 1.4 was released.
IIRC, it's the amount of memory being saved because
i see the same problem running the latest from unstable + kernel
2.0.32.
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with |
| automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion |
| and
On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
> Will someone please test the 3.9.0-1 (unstable) version of Imagemagick to
> see if it releases shared memory on your box? It doesn't on mine, and I'd
> like to verify that it's a bug in Imagemagick, and not my box, befo
"Kingsley G. Morse Jr." wrote:
>Will someone please test the 3.9.0-1 (unstable) version of Imagemagick to
>see if it releases shared memory on your box?
>
>Please post your results to this list so other people won't duplicate your
>effort.
I se
Will someone please test the 3.9.0-1 (unstable) version of Imagemagick to
see if it releases shared memory on your box? It doesn't on mine, and I'd
like to verify that it's a bug in Imagemagick, and not my box, before I
file a bug report. Here's how to duplicate it:
$ # Fi
I don't remember who (or even if it was someone in *this* list) who
asked about this, but here's the info about 3com 3c503 jumper settings
so you can rejumper your card for shared memory operation.
Actually, it looks like the info you need is printed on the board.
There are two blocks
Johnny Stevenson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a 3c503 Network card from 3Com which reports at boot time:
>
> 'REJUMPER FOR SHARED MEMORY'
>
> I have read that this is what I should do for this card, but have no
> idea of how to go about this, or even wh
Hello,
I have a 3c503 Network card from 3Com which reports at boot time:
'REJUMPER FOR SHARED MEMORY'
I have read that this is what I should do for this card, but have no
idea of how to go about this, or even where to start looking.
Is there a Howto, or does someone out there know
80 matches
Mail list logo
