Sorry, John. This shoul dhave gone to the lsit and not off-list.
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:50:41 John Hasler wrote:
> Lisi writes:
> > +1. Much easier to remember! It took me several years to be able to
> > remember my computers' names without having to look them up.
>
> I wrote:
> > Why didn't y
On Mon, 2 May 2011 14:29:21 +0100
Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 09:05:51 Jochen Schulz wrote:
> > I know someone who absolutely despises of the
> > idea that the hosts in his local network have hostnames. He likes IP
> > addresses better. :)
>
> +1. Much easier to remember! It took me s
Eike Lantzsch wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:24:36 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
From: Paul E Condon
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 12:55:37 -0600
It is crazy to write such misleading error messages. I did, in fact,
have JavaScript disabled ...
Ouch! A friend returned a new router to the vendor aft
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:24:36 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> From: Paul E Condon
> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 12:55:37 -0600
>
> > It is crazy to write such misleading error messages. I did, in fact,
> > have JavaScript disabled ...
>
> Ouch! A friend returned a new router to the vendor after
> encoun
From: Paul E Condon
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 12:55:37 -0600
> It is crazy to write such misleading error messages. I did, in fact,
> have JavaScript disabled ...
Ouch! A friend returned a new router to the vendor after
encountering such a bad proprietary interface.
An elegant solution is to
On 20110502_111609, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2011 02:35:54 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> > The web interface on the router no longer works with iceweasel. It did
> > work fine a few hours ago but now I can only get a one line message
> > (folded here for email): "Please upgrade to a vers
Lisi writes:
> +1. Much easier to remember! It took me several years to be able to
> remember my computers' names without having to look them up.
I wrote:
> Why didn't you just give them numerical names?
Mihira Fernando writes:
> Like the IP address ? :D
Sure. OneNinetyTwoDotOneSixtyEightDotO
On 05/02/2011 08:21 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Lisi writes:
+1. Much easier to remember! It took me several years to be able to
remember my computers' names without having to look them up.
Why didn't you just give them numerical names?
Like the IP address ? :D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Lisi writes:
> +1. Much easier to remember! It took me several years to be able to
> remember my computers' names without having to look them up.
Why didn't you just give them numerical names?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Monday 02 May 2011 14:51:18 Camaleón wrote:
> He likes IP
>
> >> addresses better. :)
> >
> > +1. Much easier to remember! It took me several years to be able to
> > remember my computers' names without having to look them up.
>
> Let's see if you still think the same when IPv6 comes into play
On Mon, 02 May 2011 14:29:21 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 09:05:51 Jochen Schulz wrote:
>> I know someone who absolutely despises of the
>> idea that the hosts in his local network have hostnames. He likes IP
>> addresses better. :)
>
> +1. Much easier to remember! It took me sev
> This is very helpful. But while you were responding, Netgear presented
> a new problem. The web interface on the router no longer works with
> iceweasel. It did work fine a few hours ago but now I can only get a
> one line message (folded here for email): "Please upgrade to a version
> 4 or highe
On Monday 02 May 2011 09:05:51 Jochen Schulz wrote:
> I know someone who absolutely despises of the
> idea that the hosts in his local network have hostnames. He likes IP
> addresses better. :)
+1. Much easier to remember! It took me several years to be able to remember
my computers' names wit
On Mon, 02 May 2011 02:35:54 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> The web interface on the router no longer works with iceweasel. It did
> work fine a few hours ago but now I can only get a one line message
> (folded here for email): "Please upgrade to a version 4 or higher
> browser so that you can use
On 02/05/11 09:35, Paul E Condon wrote:
Anyway, I can't have a router that can have its administrative interface
shutdown without warning in the middle of the night. I'll have to
solve that before I can respond to your suggestions.
Is this just a matter of JavaScript? I don't think any box of
On 20110502_095924, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 02 mai 11, 00:29:24, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > A few days ago, my old consumer grade router died, or seemed to die
> > such that I decided to purchase a new consumer grade router. What I
> > remembered about how the old router was set up was insuffi
Paul E Condon:
>
> […] I can see good reasons for DHCP, but I have never
> understood how I could get my four Debian hosts to talk to each other
> under DHCP. I see some things that can be configured to have DHCP
> assign fixed IPs to certain devices based on their MAC address, but is
> that what n
On Lu, 02 mai 11, 00:29:24, Paul E Condon wrote:
> A few days ago, my old consumer grade router died, or seemed to die
> such that I decided to purchase a new consumer grade router. What I
> remembered about how the old router was set up was insufficient to get
> me back up and running with the new
A few days ago, my old consumer grade router died, or seemed to die
such that I decided to purchase a new consumer grade router. What I
remembered about how the old router was set up was insufficient to get
me back up and running with the new router and the old LAN
configuration. I think my problem
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:21:37PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I see in rereading my own email, I was less clear than I should have
> been. What I was attempting to ask was, "do I have to do anything on
> the firewall box to specify that I have 3 rather than, say, 8 boxes
> connected to the hub?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 9:07 pm, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> I'm getting ready to set up a home LAN, and I wanted to first check
> that my assumptions are correct, and ask for any references that might
> help with this.
> The LAN will be:
> A
Thus spake Michael Jinks:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:07:35PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > Then configuring all the other boxen to staic IP's using 192.68.1.1 as
> > a gateway is trivial. The only thing I'm not sure of is, can I
> > specify what addresses are valid for forwarding? This is j
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:07:35PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> The only shared services will be printing and 2 exported directories,
> both coming off the main workstation.
I have printer on the firewall gateway..
> I think that the firewall box should be set up with 2 NIC's - eth0
> will be the
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:57:12PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been more clear - yes I mean IP forwarding. It
> may do mail forwarding if any Win boxes end up on the LAN - be easier
> to set up one box than a bunch, and my ISP's mailservers have dropped
> a bunch of mails.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:07:35PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Then configuring all the other boxen to staic IP's using 192.68.1.1 as
> a gateway is trivial. The only thing I'm not sure of is, can I
> specify what addresses are valid for forwarding? This is just a home
> LAN, after all, and sec
Thus spake allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx:
> steve:
>
> i am not sure what you mean by forwarding. the two possibilities that come to
> mind are mail and ip forwarding. both are rather simple.
>
> suggestion. use kernel 2.4.x and qmail (in place of sendmail) kernel 2.4.x
> will let yo
steve:
i am not sure what you mean by forwarding. the two possibilities that come to
mind are mail and ip forwarding. both are rather simple.
suggestion. use kernel 2.4.x and qmail (in place of sendmail) kernel 2.4.x
will let you use iptables (better flexibility and security, though the
learni
Hello all,
I'm getting ready to set up a home LAN, and I wanted to first check
that my assumptions are correct, and ask for any references that might
help with this.
The LAN will be:
A firewall, runny potato or woody (haven't decided yet, as I prefer the
stability of potato, but may need the newer
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 04:14:40PM +, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> Can anyone tell me what are the procedures to set up two computers
> to talk to each other via ethernet.
>
> In particular, what kind of ip I can choose. Is there a HOWTO on this??
You are free to use the 10.
On %M 0, Shao Zhang wrote
> Hi,
> Can anyone tell me what are the procedures to set up two computers
> to talk to each other via ethernet.
> In particular, what kind of ip I can choose. Is there a HOWTO on this??
>
If you install the doc-linux-text or doc-linux-html packages,
Hi Shao,
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 04:14:40PM +, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what are the procedures to set up two computers
> to talk to each other via ethernet.
>
> In particular, what kind of ip I can choose. Is there a HOWTO on this??
Check /usr/doc/HOWTO. Th
Hi,
Can anyone tell me what are the procedures to set up two computers
to talk to each other via ethernet.
In particular, what kind of ip I can choose. Is there a HOWTO on this??
Also, is there any tools like fsck in linux which can repair the fat
file
32 matches
Mail list logo
