Rob Browning writes:
> Is there any reason that msquerading wouldn't work right using the
> current (unstable) debian packages?
No! I've set up a firewall with it and it works fine.
> I set up the host (the one actually connected to the internet via ppp)
> with the following network related comma
Remco van de Meent said:
> Yes, but what you want is masquerading the eth-iface using the ppp0-iface...
>
> So what I suggest is the following:
>
> ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -S 192.168.1.1 -D 0.0.0.0/0 -W ppp0
I believe the -W option should only be used for -I and -O rules. Forwarding by
definiti
At 01:00 PM 12/30/96 -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
>Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Maybe I don't get it right, but to me, it seems you're masquerading USING
>> your eth0-interface, instead of your ppp0-interface.. am I right?
>
>That's right. I have a ppp connection from the host
Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe I don't get it right, but to me, it seems you're masquerading USING
> your eth0-interface, instead of your ppp0-interface.. am I right?
That's right. I have a ppp connection from the host to the internet,
and a ethernet connection from the c
At 12:16 PM 12/30/96 -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
>
>[Previously (accidentally) posted to debian-devel]
>
>Is there any reason that msquerading wouldn't work right using the
>current (unstable) debian packages?
>
>I tried to set up a simple net, following the instructions in the
>IP-Masquerade mini-H
[Previously (accidentally) posted to debian-devel]
Is there any reason that msquerading wouldn't work right using the
current (unstable) debian packages?
I tried to set up a simple net, following the instructions in the
IP-Masquerade mini-HOWTO, and have had no success. Here's some info
if it's
6 matches
Mail list logo
