On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:10:10AM +0530, Abdullah wrote:
> I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have
> not got a perfect answer by googling.
> I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help.
First set up a nameserver, see
/usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/DNS-HOWTO.gz. In
I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have
not got a perfect answer by googling.
I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> > I like Postfix and Dovecot
Postfix + Cyrus + SASL for simple users. You can add spamassassin +
pyzor/rzor & config your SASL to use LDAP or other auth method. For me
postfix + cyrus is just a better combi.
On Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 04:13 PM, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands
down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have
given me the flexability and security
On 26/10/10 12:10, B. Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have always
run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box I am
running on (2.4 GHz P4, 1GB
On 2010-10-26 16:42, Camaleón wrote:
> Users like many things (i.e., Hotmail/Livemail :-P) but and admin has
> also to care about another things (server requirements, performance,
> stability and security).
It's stable, since years and with many concurrent users. And the
support efforts for expl
On 26/10/10 13:21, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, B. Alexander wrote:
I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
It's dated in appearance and the lack of a back end database is what
killed it for me.
You can connect squirrellmail to sql. You s
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:14:11 +0200, Andreas Weber wrote:
> On 2010-10-26 14:13, Camaleón wrote:
>>> * spamassassin (in case I ever decide to work around the port 25
>>> block)
>
> spampd is your friend.
AFAIK, "spamd" comes within SA.
>>> * roundcube for webmail
>> As an alternative to Roundcu
On 2010-10-26 14:13, Camaleón wrote:
>> * spamassassin (in case I ever decide to work around the port 25 block)
spampd is your friend.
>> * roundcube for webmail
> As an alternative to Roundcube (I avoid webmail as much as I can) I would
> take a look into Squirrel.
RoundCube is simply great. A
I think that any modern, inexpensive system (dual- or quad-core AMD
CPUs running around 3GHz, 4GB RAM) would fit the bill.
OP didnt say how many users would be using it, but it doesn't sound like
many considering his existing box. Postfix with things like clamav,
spamassiain, webmail, mysql
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:18:41 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
>>
>> Spamassassin is resource (ram/cpu) consuming and provided that you are
>> not going online (no spam) it could be omitted.
>>
>> As an alternative to
On Ter, 26 Out 2010, "B. Alexander" wrote:
* roundcube for webmail
You could try IMP, part of the Horde suite for e-mail. It's only
slightly less ugly than SquirrelMail, but it is extremely powerful
feature-wise.
--
Use at own risk.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
--
To
essage-
From: "B. Alexander"
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33
To: Debian-user List
Subject: Mail server recommendations
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have a
I don't mind keeping my mail in a flat file rather than a db. I guess if I
were doing higher volume stuff, it might make a difference, but most of the
emails I deal with are read, deal with and delete.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camal
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, B. Alexander wrote:
> I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
It's dated in appearance and the lack of a back end database is what
killed it for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> I like Postfix and Dovecot :-)
I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands
down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have
given me the flexability and security of Postfix. Not to mention it's
the easies
I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> > Now the mail server, since Comcast blocked port 25, is mainly used for
> > internal monitor/security messa
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33 -0400, B. Alexander wrote:
(...)
> Now the mail server, since Comcast blocked port 25, is mainly used for
> internal monitor/security messages, like ossec and opsview, apticron
> messages, etc. So I was looking to set up an OpenVZ container, probably
> sid, as a mails
On 10/26/2010 06:10 AM, B. Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have
always run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box
I am running on (2.4 GHz P4,
Hi all,
I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my
internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have always
run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box I am
running on (2.4 GHz P4, 1GB RAM) is being beaten to death by java in
Andy Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:05:04PM +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
> > I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual
> > or quad core 64-bit CPU at >2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And
> > of course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems.
> > Ever
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:05:04PM +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
> I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
> quad core 64-bit CPU at >2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
> course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
> is not that impor
> I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
> quad core 64-bit CPU at >2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
> course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
> is not that important.
>
> Anything people can recommend?
Dell PowerEdge 1950
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:02:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/16/07 15:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/07 15:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> But not the 2.6.18-3 kernel, which, as of yesterday, was still the
>>> defau
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > But not the 2.6.18-3 kernel, which, as of yesterday, was still the
> > default kernel for etch. See bug 401006.
>
> OKAY, Hendrik. STOP with the nitpicking. This i
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:05:04PM +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
> I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
> quad core 64-bit CPU at >2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
> course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
> is not that impor
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 23:05 +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
> I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
> quad core 64-bit CPU at >2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
> course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything
> else is not that important
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:56:51AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:14 +0100, Richard wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bellon:
> > > > Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I've
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 09:56 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:14 +0100, Richard wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bellon:
> > > Greg Folkert wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've been running this:
> > > >
> > > > HP Proliant DL145 G2
> > > >
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:14 +0100, Richard wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bellon:
> > Greg Folkert wrote:
> >
> > > I've been running this:
> > >
> > > HP Proliant DL145 G2
> > > http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl145/
> > >
> >
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 09:59 +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > I've been running this:
> >
> > HP Proliant DL145 G2
> > http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl145/
> >
> > Since May 2006, of course I don't have a REALLY fast one. But the
> > mac
Am Dienstag, den 16.01.2007, 09:59 +0100 schrieb Stefan Bellon:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > I've been running this:
> >
> > HP Proliant DL145 G2
> > http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl145/
> >
> > Since May 2006, of course I don't have a REALLY fast one. But the
Greg Folkert wrote:
> I've been running this:
>
> HP Proliant DL145 G2
> http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl145/
>
> Since May 2006, of course I don't have a REALLY fast one. But the
> machine supports 1 or 2 processors (single or Dual core) and 32GB of
> memory
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:05:04 +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote
> I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual
> or quad core 64-bit CPU at >2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And
> of course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems.
> Everything else is not that important
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 23:05 +0100, Stefan Bellon wrote:
> I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
> quad core 64-bit CPU at >2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
> course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
> is not that important.
>
I'm looking for server hardware with the following contraints: dual or
quad core 64-bit CPU at >2.5 GHz and more than 16 GB of RAM. And of
course it should run Debian GNU/Linux without problems. Everything else
is not that important.
Anything people can recommend?
--
Stefan Bellon
--
To UNSUB
i can see that my partners are soon going to be looking at
claendar server features... m$ exchange server is going to be
the touchstone -- if some of y'all'uns have experience with some
of the calendaring solutions available on debian, i'd love to
hear them.
we've got some outlook users and some l
Hey you people. I want to install an IRC server in my machine, a
private one, the administration must be able to add and remove user
accounts, these account with passwds. You can't get into the network
unless invated, etc. is this possible? If so, which is the best out
there? I did
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Greetings!
I'm looking for a "light secure ftp server" for my personal
web site. (ok.. ftp site) All this bugger needs to do is
accept uploads for anonymous, restricted and secure as possible.
Load will be lite, and if someone try's to overload it.. then the
server should just gracefully die. I'
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:09:58PM -0800, Jack Pistachio wrote:
> I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
> debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
> putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest way
> to do it. This, of course, requires that your friends
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 02:59:35PM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> What's a good, and hopefully open source & free, program that can act as
> a SSH server on a Windows box? I do most of my work in Linux/Debian,
> but there's one offsite webserver I have to take care of that's Win2K.
> Presently I ftp
Try the free cygwin download:
http://www..cygwin.com/
Kevin Coyner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:12:09PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote..
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:12:09PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote..
> On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
> > I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
> > debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
> > putty sftp client for windows. This seems th ea
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
> I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
> debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
> putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest way
> to do it. This, of course, requires that your friends are
> users o
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest way
to do it. This, of course, requires that your friends are
users on your system.
-jackp
--- ScruLoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
ScruLoose said:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm interested in making a few files available to friends of
> mine, and in having an upload directory for them to give me stuff, too.
> I'm wondering what's the best tool for this job.
> The first thing that comes to mind is FTP, but I'm not sure it's the right
* ScruLoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030314 23:09 PST]:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm interested in making a few files available to friends of
> mine, and in having an upload directory for them to give me stuff, too.
> I'm wondering what's the best tool for this job.
>
> * I'll only be talking about a ve
Hi all,
I'm interested in making a few files available to friends of
mine, and in having an upload directory for them to give me stuff, too.
I'm wondering what's the best tool for this job.
* I'll only be talking about a very few users. (like 10 to 20 total)
* I don't have any particular
>If you want to run a database backend for a CMS (if I remember
>correctly, that's what drupal is, right?), you'll need even more RAM --
>my machine slowed noticably when I've run mysql in the past. But it's
>certainly do-able on this hardware, and the ram for these machines is
>still fairly easily
-- Dan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Wednesday, 18 December 2002, 08:58 PM -0600):
> I am ready to set up my own Web Server rather than paying my friends each month.
>
> Your IT guidance would be appreciated. I have a dusty Pentium 90 with
> 32 MB Ram, and a 1 GB Drive. The new unit will be e
nate said:
> I'm sure people will disagree but I strongly do not reccomend running a
> system, even a minimal one with less then 64MB of ram. If your using zope
> you probably want something more powerful. My experience with zope is
> limited to Zwiki, but I have noticed that it takes 100 to 200 o
hi ya dan
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Dan Hunt wrote:
> I am ready to set up my own Web Server rather than paying my friends each month.
>
> Your IT guidance would be appreciated. I have a dusty Pentium 90 with 32 MB Ram,
> and a 1 GB Drive. The new unit will be equipped with Debian Woody, on a
> st
Dan Hunt said:
> I am ready to set up my own Web Server rather than paying my friends each
> month.
>
> Your IT guidance would be appreciated. I have a dusty Pentium 90 with 32
> MB Ram, and a 1 GB Drive. The new unit will be equipped with Debian Woody,
> on a static DSL IP address without any fire
I am ready to set up my own Web Server rather than paying my friends each month.
Your IT guidance would be appreciated. I have a dusty Pentium 90 with 32 MB Ram, and a
1 GB Drive. The new unit will be equipped with Debian Woody, on a static DSL IP
address without any firewall. Will this meager e
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Eugene van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations for a IMAP server (on Debian 2.2)? IMAP4.7c (I
> think this is UW IMAP?)
On Solaris, I've had a great amount of success with the Courier-IMAP
suite. Courier-IMAP only uses Maildirs, which is a newer mailbox storage
format tha
Disclaimer: I'm the UW imapd maintainer so I'm biased. :-)
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Eugene van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations for a IMAP server (on Debian 2.2)? IMAP4.7c (I
> think this is UW IMAP?)
Yes.
seems to intergrates relatively painless and
> support most IMAP features (although
On Wed 2001-04-04 (15:59), Eugene van Zyl wrote:
> Thanks, I'll courier looks like it then :-)
>
> With exim I saw the debian docs for courier indicate that I set Exim up for
> maildir delivery - will the POP3 server pick the mail up correctly from the
> maildir
> then? also will the pop client (
Thanks, I'll courier looks like it then :-)
With exim I saw the debian docs for courier indicate that I set Exim up for
maildir delivery - will the POP3 server pick the mail up correctly from the
maildir
then? also will the pop client (if not set to leave a copy on the server) kill
the
mail from
On Wed 2001-04-04 (10:41), Eugene van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any recommendations for a IMAP server (on Debian 2.2)? IMAP4.7c (I
> think this is UW IMAP?) seems to intergrates relatively painless and
> support most IMAP features (although I couldn't find anything on
> shared folders), courier-imap se
Hi,
Any recommendations for a IMAP server (on Debian 2.2)? IMAP4.7c (I think this
is UW IMAP?) seems to intergrates relatively painless and support most IMAP
features (although I couldn't find anything on shared folders), courier-imap
seems technically better(?) but confusing to set up especial
61 matches
Mail list logo
