On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:20:24PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 08/10/2005 06:32:56 AM, Daniel D Jones wrote:
>
> ...
> > If the info is pasted in too fast, the router or switch will drop
> > characters, so I need something with a configurable delay after
> > pasting characters or lines from
Carl Fink wrote:
> That's the cliche of how Linux people treat questions, right there. "If you
> want a program like that, just write one yourself."
That wasn't the answer given. He rightfully pointed out that one has all
the tools right now to do what he wants; they're split apart which is
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 16:31, Carl Fink wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:16:53PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> Well, you did ask _why_ no such program was about. I'm thinking
>> the answer is that people who want something like this
>> have wacked up something customized to their specific n
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:16:53PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Well, you did ask _why_ no such program was about. I'm thinking
> the answer is that people who want something like this
> have wacked up something customized to their specific need.
No, that was Daniel Jones. I was just astonishe
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:50:55AM -0400, rpeterso wrote:
> Are you familiar with 'screen'?
BTW, you can do serial stuff w/ screen directly, if you like. E.g.:
1017# cat /local/etc/screenrc.serial
# This assumes that serialuser has proper
# permissions to access the serial ports and to
# write
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:32:56AM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 August 2005 01:13 am, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On 08/10/2005 12:27:50 AM, Chris Palmer wrote:
> ... I SSH into that server, then telnet into the device. When
> I'm working on a device, being able to scroll back to
Daniel D Jones wrote:
Right now, I'm using SecureCRT on a company supplied Windows laptop. I'd
prefer to use my own, Linux laptop. SecureCRT handles everything I've talked
about easily. I was looking for something which could do the same thing in
Linux. Evidently, it doesn't exist. Yes, i
On 08/10/2005 06:32:56 AM, Daniel D Jones wrote:
Sorry, don't mean to be all elite about modularization.
This is what I'd do, and do do in similar circumstances.
YMMV
I'm a Cisco tech for a very large organization. Half the time, I'm
connected
to a router console via a serial port. The othe
On 08/10/2005 04:34:38 AM, Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 05:13:45AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Wow.
That's the cliche of how Linux people treat questions, right there.
"If you
want a program like that, just write one yourself."
Well, you did ask _why_ no such program was about.
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 01:27, Chris Palmer wrote:
>Gregory Seidman writes:
>> Actually, I'm pretty happy with minicom. Are you unhappy merely
>> because it was written in the 90s? Or because it is text-based (as
>> is its purpose, after all)?
>
>As Unix-like-system afficionados, we can't affor
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 01:13 am, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 08/10/2005 12:27:50 AM, Chris Palmer wrote:
> > As Unix-like-system afficionados, we can't afford to get uppity about
> > what decade our software was designed and implemented in. :)
> >
> > Like Gregory, I find minicom entirely suffici
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 05:13:45AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> As for the rest of it, why have everything in one big wad?
> If you want a window with scrollback use an xterm.
> If you want ssh/scp/sftp/telnet/rsh then use that
> program. If you want session logging use script.
> If you want ker
On 08/10/2005 12:13:45 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
If you can't recall the commands and
_must_ have them in a menu then wack something
out with tcl/tk or make a special menu bar/drawer/applets
with gnome or whatever.
I suspect the right way to do this is to use XUL,
javascript, and mozilla. Wi
On 08/10/2005 12:27:50 AM, Chris Palmer wrote:
As Unix-like-system afficionados, we can't afford to get uppity about
what decade our software was designed and implemented in. :)
Like Gregory, I find minicom entirely sufficient. In fact I very
nearly
like it.
As for the rest of it, why have e
Gregory Seidman writes:
> Actually, I'm pretty happy with minicom. Are you unhappy merely
> because it was written in the 90s? Or because it is text-based (as is
> its purpose, after all)?
As Unix-like-system afficionados, we can't afford to get uppity about
what decade our software was designed
pen Source.) I can't seem to find anything but stuff that was
} written in the '90s like minicom or programs that have limited
} capabilities. For example, Komport (KDE's serial comm program) is limited
} to a 25 x 80 screen, despite the fact that it's a GUI program. I'm
was written in the
'90s like minicom or programs that have limited capabilities. For example,
Komport (KDE's serial comm program) is limited to a 25 x 80 screen, despite
the fact that it's a GUI program. I'm looking for a GUI program with a
scrollback buffer, scripting, mul
17 matches
Mail list logo
