Re: [OT] sendmail relay to gmail smtp server

2011-12-30 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam writes: > So after dozens of small edits and restarts and makemaps ... cutting > to the chase: > > /etc/mail/authinfo > > (password obfuscated) > , > | Athinfo:smtp.gmail.com "U:root" "I:hputn...@gmail.com" "P:??XX??" "M: LOGIN > PLAIN" > | Athinfo:smtp.gmail.com:587 "U:root" "I

Re: [OT] sendmail relay to gmail smtp server

2011-12-27 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 28/12/11 01:49, Harry Putnam wrote: > Scott Ferguson writes: > >> You don't show your authentication settings eg.:- >> define(`CERT_DIR’, `/etc/mail/certs’) >> define(`confCACERT_PATH’, `CERT_DIR’) >> define(`confCACERT’, `CERT_DIR/ca-bundle.crt’) >> define(`confCRL’, `CERT_DIR/ca-bundle.crt’)

Re: [OT] sendmail relay to gmail smtp server

2011-12-27 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Ma, 27 dec 11, 15:25:32, Harry Putnam wrote: > > Is that right? Any way I did it and got the same uninformative > errors: > > Verbose smtp: > , > | 050 >>> MAIL From: SIZE=560 AUTH=<> > | 050 530-5.5.1 Authentication Required. Learn more at > > | 050 530 5.

Re: [OT] sendmail relay to gmail smtp server

2011-12-27 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam writes: > Scott Ferguson writes: > >> You don't show your authentication settings eg.:- >> define(`CERT_DIR’, `/etc/mail/certs’) >> define(`confCACERT_PATH’, `CERT_DIR’) >> define(`confCACERT’, `CERT_DIR/ca-bundle.crt’) >> define(`confCRL’, `CERT_DIR/ca-bundle.crt’) >> define(`confS

Re: [OT] sendmail relay to gmail smtp server

2011-12-27 Thread Harry Putnam
Scott Ferguson writes: > You don't show your authentication settings eg.:- > define(`CERT_DIR’, `/etc/mail/certs’) > define(`confCACERT_PATH’, `CERT_DIR’) > define(`confCACERT’, `CERT_DIR/ca-bundle.crt’) > define(`confCRL’, `CERT_DIR/ca-bundle.crt’) > define(`confSERVER_CERT’, `CERT_DIR/sendmail.

Re: [OT] sendmail relay to gmail smtp server

2011-12-26 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 27/12/11 14:19, Harry Putnam wrote: > First let me say, I'm not interested in switching mta's. > > I want to use gmails' smtp server as Smart Host for my single user > debian box running sendmail-8.14.4 > > I'm hooked up to an ISP called direcpath.tv in Atlanta that uses gmail > smtp servers f

[OT] sendmail relay to gmail smtp server

2011-12-26 Thread Harry Putnam
First let me say, I'm not interested in switching mta's. I want to use gmails' smtp server as Smart Host for my single user debian box running sendmail-8.14.4 I'm hooked up to an ISP called direcpath.tv in Atlanta that uses gmail smtp servers for its clients with addresses like rea...@direcpath.t

Re: Sendmail Relay.

1999-05-20 Thread Anthony Landreneau
neau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >> Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:43:45 -0500 >> Subject: Sendmail Relay. >> >> Greetings, >> I am having a problem with the lastest dist of sendmail that is coming >> with Debian. With my ol

Re: Sendmail Relay.

1999-05-19 Thread thomas lakofski
opefully this should work for you... see how far it gets you. regards, -tl On Wed, 19 May 1999, Anthony Landreneau wrote: > From: Anthony Landreneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:43:45 -0500 > Subject: Sendmail Relay. >

Sendmail Relay.

1999-05-19 Thread Anthony Landreneau
Greetings, I am having a problem with the lastest dist of sendmail that is coming with Debian. With my old sendmail.cf I was able to use my DNS's as mail relay host for the several dozen domains that I host for. With the new sendmail.cf all of my domains are getting "550 we do not relay"

How to close a sendmail relay, and more

1998-01-01 Thread Thomas Lakofski
Dec 1997 13:48:31 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: sendmail relay against spam on debian Anthony- Try the following procedure. It may seem like a lot, but go step by step and you should be OK. Send me mail if you have a problem, or try 'talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]' for a speedier method of comm

sendmail relay against spam on debian

1997-12-29 Thread Anthony Landreneau
Greetings, I have two Debian boxes that sit on my Network. The network is host to about 100 domains. Along with acting as the DNS for the network, the two boxes also act as MX relay for all of the domains. The problem is someone out there found my boxes and used them to dump spam.