for Postfix is:
/etc/hosts
1.2.3.4example.com
/etc/postfix/main.cf
smtp_dns_support_level = disabled
smtp_host_lookup = native
Now I'm trying to achieve the same thing for Sendmail to no avail.
So far I've tried:
- the above /etc/hosts entry
- DEAMON_OPTIONS(`Port-smtp,Addr=12
Thanks for pointing that out.
I've noticed that installing sendmail package was removing postfix and
vice versa.
That made me think these two were mutually exclusive.
After reinstalling postfix, logwatch suddenly started sending emails so
everything is now working as expected.
---
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 18:36:30 +1000
George at Clug wrote:
> Adam,
>
> I dislike people to reply to my questions but do not answer the
> question, instead suggest I do something totally different.
Yes, but sometimes:
a) that's the right answer anyway
b) it may not answer the OP's question. but
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:24:06 +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
> with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
&g
Adam Weremczuk writes:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
> with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
>
> to make logwatch use postfix (al
and any other email traffic being disabled.
>
> A simple working solution that I've found for Postfix is:
>
> /etc/hosts
> 1.2.3.4example.com
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf
> smtp_dns_support_level = disabled
> smtp_host_lookup = native
>
> Now I'm tryin
Adam Weremczuk writes:
> Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
>
> What exactly shall I substitute:
>
> mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
>
Eee. Nothing?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
dpkg -L pos
Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
What exactly shall I substitute:
mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
to make logwatch use postfix (already working without DNS) instead of
sendmail?
On 21/07/2024 0
Sendmail is too old to be supported.
You may use postfix and exim instead. They are main stream MTA software
today.
On 2024-07-21 14:58, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
This is in a way a continuation of my recently "purely local DNS"
thread.
To recap: my objective is to send emails t
ample.com
/etc/postfix/main.cf
smtp_dns_support_level = disabled
smtp_host_lookup = native
Now I'm trying to achieve the same thing for Sendmail to no avail.
So far I've tried:
- the above /etc/hosts entry
- DEAMON_OPTIONS(`Port-smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl in sendmail.
es to me:
SRV_Features:127.0.0.1 L U G
Specifically, I added the U and G features, (I already had the L
feature disabled for localhost). Uppercase letter disables the
feature, lowercase enables it.
I found the U and G mentioned here:
https://forums.oracle.com/ords/apexds/post/solaris-11-4-sen
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 09:34:39 +0100, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> cron isn’t a mail sending tool — not the right place to police something
> like this. Seems to me that sendmail is.
There are two possible layers here. First, a cron job (typically a
shell command, or a shell script) might
L U G
Specifically, I added the U and G features, (I already had the L
feature disabled for localhost). Uppercase letter disables the
feature, lowercase enables it.
I found the U and G mentioned here:
https://forums.oracle.com/ords/apexds/post/solaris-11-4-sendmail-issue-after-sendmail-8-18-1-update
s. Indeed, even mail will do
so happily.
cron isn?t a mail sending tool ? not the right place to police something
like this. Seems to me that sendmail is.
Mark
Sendmail now polices it - so cron emails get stuck if they contain a
bare cr. Presumably every mta is now doing something similar.
Th
l will do
> so happily.
>
> cron isn’t a mail sending tool — not the right place to police something
like this. Seems to me that sendmail is.
Mark
has always worked.
> >
> > I'm only likely to have cron generating emails like this.
> >
> > Strange that this would have been changed in a stable release. It
> > doesn't seem to have been a security update.
>
> It looks like it's coming fr
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 6:08 PM Tim Woodall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
> >
> >> After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
> >> seeing this in the logs:
>
tures, (I already had the L
feature disabled for localhost). Uppercase letter disables the
feature, lowercase enables it.
I found the U and G mentioned here:
https://forums.oracle.com/ords/apexds/post/solaris-11-4-sendmail-issue-after-sendmail-8-18-1-update-7312
I did not try this suggestion to u
ing emails like this.
Strange that this would have been changed in a stable release. It
doesn't seem to have been a security update.
It looks like it's coming from this change:
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.17.1.9-2+deb12u2_changelog
this.
>
> Strange that this would have been changed in a stable release. It
> doesn't seem to have been a security update.
It looks like it's coming from this change:
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/s/sendmail/sendmail_8.17.1.9-2+deb12u2_chan
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
seeing this in the logs:
Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot of odd things.
root@dirac:~# mail root
Cc:
Subject: test cr
this
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 10:20:24PM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> > After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
> > seeing this in the logs:
> >
>
> Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot o
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
seeing this in the logs:
Hmmm, this update seems to have done a lot of odd things.
MSP Queue status...
/var/spool/mqueue-client (2 requests)
-Q-ID- -
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Michael Grant wrote:
Jun 30 11:43:00 bottom sm-mta[18852]: AUTH: available mech=DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
LOGIN PLAIN, allowed mech=EXTERNAL
Update here, it's not apparently an STARTTLS error, it's an AUTH
error. Something in the update last night altered my list of
available
> Jun 30 11:43:00 bottom sm-mta[18852]: AUTH: available mech=DIGEST-MD5
> CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN, allowed mech=EXTERNAL
Update here, it's not apparently an STARTTLS error, it's an AUTH
error. Something in the update last night altered my list of
available AUTH mechanisms.
I manually updated sendm
After an update today, sendmail is refusing to accept mail. I'm
seeing this in the logs:
STARTTLS=read, info: fds=9/4, err=2
Here's the full log from when I try to send a message through my
server with authentication:
Jun 30 11:42:59 bottom sm-mta[18852]: NOQUEUE: connect from [1.2.3
orks. There is an little helper program; try:
> testsaslauthd -u -p
>
> you might have to specify the location (-f path) of the unix socket if it
> is located
> somewhere uncommon.
>
> If your authentication works then the communication between sendmail and
> saslauthd
> is
r the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP
> > server
> > > for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
> > > have deployed and configured Sendmail on probably hundreds of servers
> > over
> > > the years, but most of them
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:37 AM Henning Follmann
wrote:
>
> First, please do not top post.
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> > Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP
> server
> > for a university, and w
First, please do not top post.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 09:00:00AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP server
> for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
> have deployed and configured Se
Thanks for the advice. Just to clarify, this is an enterprise SMTP server
for a university, and we have used Sendmail for at least 25 years now. I
have deployed and configured Sendmail on probably hundreds of servers over
the years, but most of them are on internal networks and relay mail
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:55:06AM -0400, Dave Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Years ago, I set up an SMTP server on Debian 7.5, running Sendmail
> configured for SASL authentication using an LDAP directory. I am now
> trying to set up a new one on Debian 11.5 in pretty much the same
Hello,
Years ago, I set up an SMTP server on Debian 7.5, running Sendmail
configured for SASL authentication using an LDAP directory. I am now
trying to set up a new one on Debian 11.5 in pretty much the same
configuration, but SMTP auth does not work. I have verified that nslcd and
saslauthd
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 09:34:25 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:57:10 -0600 David Wright wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the problem is similar to the one I had with this list
> > (hence the change I made above). What happened was that my posts'
> > Envelope-from (set to the same as my From addre
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 08:52:30 (+), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-26 03:57, David Wright wrote:
>
> > What sort of rejections and/or bounces have you had?
>
> It showed up that mails to getmail list that uses Exim were refused as
> unsubscribed whereas before was OK.
I take it that was late
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:57:10 -0600
David Wright wrote:
> Perhaps the problem is similar to the one I had with this list
> (hence the change I made above). What happened was that my posts'
> Envelope-from (set to the same as my From address above) was being
> changed by my mail hosting service to
On 2020-11-26 03:57, David Wright wrote:
What sort of rejections and/or bounces have you had?
It showed up that mails to getmail list that uses Exim were refused as
unsubscribed whereas before was OK.
I "think" I then subscribed with noctiluc...@sky.com which worked for a
bit but then from l
On Wed 25 Nov 2020 at 00:08:27 (+), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> > > collection, sendmail and thunderbird
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:11:29 +
Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:13:03 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook
> > > while away from home, as I have both "smart"
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:13:03 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook
> > while away from home, as I have both "smart"phone and tablet, but
> > they are extremely limited toys and they a
s here]
> >>>
> >>> > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> >>> > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
> >>> > like this is a common practice.
> >>> >
> >>> &g
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
Joe wrote:
...
> proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook while
> away from home, as I have both "smart"phone and tablet, but they are
> extremely limited toys and they are owned by Google. If I need a mobile
> computer, then I want a rea
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:30:41AM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 23:34:56 -0600 David Wright
> wrote:
>
> >>> On Mon 23 Nov 2020 at 14:27:36 (+1100), Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> >>> > So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>
> Interesting. I'll try it next time I want
t;> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> >> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
> >> like this is a common practice.
> >>
> >> What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting
> >> tbir
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:30:49 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>
> I like the idea of a local imap server. I have a RPi that will do the
> job, sitting ready and waiting. How easy is it to get phone/tablet to
> connect while I'm away? though. A good URI would be an excellent
> answer.
>
Less so
On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
So does htis get a new subject in the list?
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:50:34 -0600 John Hasler
wrote:
>> I use Fetchmail to fetch my mail every five minutes from Newsguy.
>> This means that my mail is never on anyone else's server for more
>> than a few minutes. Fetchmail hands it off to Exim which passes it
>> through Mailagent and Spamass
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:19:16 +0200 Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
>>> On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>>> > So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>>> >
>>> > Good afternon All
>>> >
>>> > I was interested to
;> > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
>>> > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
>>> > like this is a common practice.
>>> >
>>> > What are the advantages of this set of processes over let
I use Fetchmail to fetch my mail every five minutes from Newsguy. This
means that my mail is never on anyone else's server for more than a few
minutes. Fetchmail hands it off to Exim which passes it through
Mailagent and Spamassassin and then delivers it to my inbox. Outgoing
mail is delivered t
On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>
> Good afternon All
>
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
> this is a commo
On 2020-11-23 at 05:43, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:21:25 +1100 Keith Bainbridge
> wrote:
>> PS Am I wrong to avoid 'everyting in 1 file' where possible (mail
>> dir rather than mbox in this case)? OK this is probably a whole
>> separate topic.
>
> As I've posted elsewhere, I have abou
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:21:25 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> Good afternon All
>
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
> this is a common practice.
>
> What are the adva
On Mon 23 Nov 2020 at 14:27:36 (+1100), Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> So does htis get a new subject in the list?
It would appear so. I guess you could also have removed the Re:
from the subject line.
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection, sen
So does htis get a new subject in the list?
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this is a common practice.
What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
it
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this is a common practice.
What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
it all? - or any other client for that matter
Dan,
> You could do the wrapper, or you could install nullmailer, which
> is an extremely simple MTA that always hands off mail to a
> relayhost (i.e. somebody else's problem).
I ended up with a following wrapper:
$ cat /usr/sbin/sendmail
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# As header fields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 3/6/19 5:40 am, Martin T wrote:
> What could be the most elegant workaround in this situation? Create
> a /usr/sbin/sendmail wrapper script which processes the
> "/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t" command called by apt_listcha
with "email_address" configuration option. Now
> when I upgrade a package which has NEWS/changelog present, then I get
> the "apt-listchanges: The mail frontend needs an installed 'sendmail',
> using pager" error message. This is because I don't have
which has NEWS/changelog present, then I get
the "apt-listchanges: The mail frontend needs an installed 'sendmail',
using pager" error message. This is because I don't have
/usr/sbin/sendmail binary installed. I prefer to use mail/mailx and an
external MTA.
What could be
On 29.08.18 11:57, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> However both sendmail and update-inetd are orphaned at the moment (no
> regular maintainers, although Andreas Beckmann has done a lot of work
> via the QA team)
After favouring sendmail for a decade and a half, I thought I was slow
to switch t
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:42:01AM -0400, Luis Finotti wrote:
Thanks for the pointer! sendmail-base.prerm had the line:
update-inetd --group MAIL --disable smtp,smtps,submission;
and I was getting the error
update-inetd: error: --group is only relevant with --add
This would appear to be a
> Building dependency tree
>> > Reading state information... Done
>> > Package 'sendemail' is not installed, so not removed
>> > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
>> > 1 not fully installed or removed.
>> > After this
Thanks once more for the support! The problem is now solved.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:20 AM David Wright
wrote:
> On Tue 28 Aug 2018 at 09:48:06 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
>
> > # dpkg -P sendmail-base
> > (Reading database ... 1562548 files and directories c
On Tue 28 Aug 2018 at 09:48:06 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> # dpkg -P sendmail-base
> (Reading database ... 1562548 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing sendmail-base (8.15.2-11) ...
> update-inetd: error: --group is only relevant with --add
> dpkg: error pro
g state information... Done
> > Package 'sendemail' is not installed, so not removed
> > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> > 1 not fully installed or removed.
> > After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
&
alled, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> 1 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Setting up sendmail-base (8.15.2-11) ...
sendmail-base is what you should be trying to remove.
And you should be using dpkg directly, not messing
Firstly, thanks for the reply!
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:04 AM David Wright
wrote:
> On Mon 27 Aug 2018 at 12:38:42 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
> > aptosid -- ht
On Mon 27 Aug 2018 at 12:38:42 (-0400), Luis Finotti wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
> aptosid -- http://www.aptosid.com -- actually).
Perhaps their forums might help.
> I tried to install and it failed:
Hi everyone,
I'm having trouble installing/removing sendmail in Debian Sid (well,
aptosid -- http://www.aptosid.com -- actually).
I tried to install and it failed: https://pastebin.com/Qu2jRqsn
'apt -f install' did not fix it, nor did 'dpkg --configure -a'.
Since it w
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 23:44 +, jon wrote:
>
> root@mail:/usr/share/doc# ldd /usr/sbin/sendmail |grep 'libwrap'
> libwrap.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0xb7525000)
> root@mail:/usr/share/doc# cat /etc/debian_version
> 8.2
>
> I want to
root@mail:/usr/share/doc# ldd /usr/sbin/sendmail |grep 'libwrap'
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwrap.so.0 (0xb7525000)
root@mail:/usr/share/doc# cat /etc/debian_version
8.2
I want to use sendmail with tcp wrappers but it does not seem to play,
it looks like it was
I finally managed to get sendmail working using systemd.
Here is my /etc/systemd/system/sendmail.service:
[Unit]
Description=Sendmail Mail Transport Agent
Requires=clamav-daemon.service spamassassin.service
After=syslog.target network.target clamav-daemon.service
spamassassin.service
Conflicts
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:07:37PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Reco wrote:
> > I don't know if this has anything to do with that:
> >
> > # systemctl enable sendmail
> > Synchronizing state for sendmail.servi
Hi,
Michael Grant writes:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Could you try restarting sendmail (systemctl restart sendmail) and show
>> the output of `systemctl status sendmail'? It also shows the most recent
>> log entries, but the output of
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Michael Grant wrote:
> > I'm still searching for an answer to this.
> > After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
> > I see that the system is using systemd.
> > ...
>
> S
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> ...
> Could you try restarting sendmail (systemctl restart sendmail) and show
> the output of `systemctl status sendmail'? It also shows the most recent
> log entries, but the output of journalctl --unit sendmail --si
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Reco wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:31:26PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco wrote:
> ...
> >
> > Try adding
> >
> > export _SYSTEMCTL_SKIP_REDIRECT="true"
> &g
Michael Grant wrote:
> I'm still searching for an answer to this.
> After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
> I see that the system is using systemd.
> ...
Some comments that I think are relevant...
Since it took a while for someone to respond to your
Hi,
Michael Grant writes:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco wrote:
>> A nessesary correction - /etc/init.d/sendmail *tries* to run
>> '/bin/systemctl start sendmail.service'.
>>
>> But, since no sendmail* package provide systemd's service file -
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:25PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
> > I'm still searching for an answer to this.
> >
> > After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
> >
> > I
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:03:25PM +, Michael Grant wrote:
> I'm still searching for an answer to this.
>
> After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
>
> I see that the system is using systemd. I see that the /etc/init.d/sendmail
&g
I'm still searching for an answer to this.
After upgrade from wheezy to testing, sendmail no longer starts.
I see that the system is using systemd. I see that the
/etc/init.d/sendmail script now runs /bin/systemctl start
sendmail.service. But sendmail isn't started. Even run
Today I upgraded a test machine from wheezy to testing.
It seemed to install systemd, I'm not sure if it's using it or not.
One thing I noticed though was that sendmail no longer starts at boot. Even
if I run:
/etc/init.d/sendmail start
or if I cd to /etc/mail and run:
make restar
Just for the sake of completeness, this wasn't actually an issue with the
GreetPause option or anything else in the access file. The problem was
that sendmail was attempting an IDENT query to the client, with a 5-second
timeout. The access file wasn't even checked until after the timeo
I'm struggling with a reference beyond my own work. Please try
> putting a second and maybe a third octet on your GreetPause: 10 line. Also,
> please verify you are issuing a kill -HUP on sendmail. We never got
> sendmail greetpause to work with a single octet. Normally we do
:1 0
Connect:10 RELAY
GreetPause:10 0
ClientRate:10 0
ClientConn:10 0
Dave,
I'm struggling with a reference beyond my own work. Please try
putting a second and maybe a third octet on your GreetPause: 10 line.
Also, please verify you are issuing a kill -HUP on sendmail. We never got
sendmai
Yes! That seems to be the culprit. I ran an strace on the sendmail
process and that's exactly what happens:
[ ... ]
4007 15:09:08.386921 connect(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(113),
sin_addr=inet_addr("10.3.1.40")}, 16
3792 15:09:13.386272 <... select resum
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:12:11 +
Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:27:42 -0500
> David Parker wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the replies.
> >
> > The system is not using tcpwrappers, and it's also not a DNS issue.
> > The client PC does have a reverse DNS entry. A tcpdump packet
> > capture on t
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:27:42 -0500
David Parker wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> The system is not using tcpwrappers, and it's also not a DNS issue.
> The client PC does have a reverse DNS entry. A tcpdump packet
> capture on the server shows the initial connection from the client
> followe
Parker wrote:
> > We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit.
>
> > Kaccess hash -T /etc/mail/access
> > # FEATURE(`access_db', `hash -T /etc/mail/access', `skip')dnl
>
> > For some reason, I just can't get it to not pause when gr
David Parker wrote:
> We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit.
> Kaccess hash -T /etc/mail/access
> # FEATURE(`access_db', `hash -T /etc/mail/access', `skip')dnl
> For some reason, I just can't get it to not pause when greeting extern
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:38 PM, David Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit.
> We're using the file /etc/mail/access for access control and rate limiting,
> and this is enabled via the following lines in /etc/mail/send
Hello,
We have an SMTP server running Sendmail 8.14.4-4 on Debian 7 64-bit. We're
using the file /etc/mail/access for access control and rate limiting, and
this is enabled via the following lines in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf:
Kaccess hash -T /etc/mail/access
# FEATURE(`access_db', `ha
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:34:45AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Is there a way to specify smart host and credentials with Sendmail
> command? If yes, could you point me to example.
May I recommend msmtp? It's perfect for relaying e-mail to always-connected,
real SMTPs. I'
Is there a way to specify smart host and credentials with Sendmail
command? If yes, could you point me to example.
Thanks in advance
On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 19:10:05 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> OK, here we go.
>
> mailx -v -s "TEST "141014_184452" 2xd1 rea...@jtan.com < /tmp/tstmsg.txt
Two mails are being sent.
> 550 5.1.1 <2...@2xd1.local.lan>... User unknown
This one didn't make it.
> Why does it go to a dead letter
I managed to get sendmail sort of working on one of my vbox guest
debian vms.
It was kind of rough sledding and still not really working properly.
I use a smarthost from fastmail.fm where I have accounts. Finally
seems to have gotten the auth working thru access.db.
But an odd thing is
Curt writes:
> On 2014-05-18, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>>| rea...@newsguy.com... Deferred: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot
>>| write ./dfs4IGodqZ004450 (bfcommit, uid=0, gid=122): No such file or
>>| directory Closing connection to [127.0.0.1]
>> `
>>
>>
On 2014-05-18, Harry Putnam wrote:
>| rea...@newsguy.com... Deferred: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot
>| write ./dfs4IGodqZ004450 (bfcommit, uid=0, gid=122): No such file or
>| directory Closing connection to [127.0.0.1]
> `
>
> Where is sendmail trying to write? Why is
1 - 100 of 1845 matches
Mail list logo
