Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-18 Thread Theodore Alcapotaxis
> - Original Message - > From: Andrei POPESCU > Sent: 05/17/14 05:06 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package > > You haven't yet stated why you need the backports kernel, but if you > want to keep using it insta

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-17 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 19:35:40, Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: Andrei POPESCU > > Sent: 05/15/14 04:50 AM > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package > > > > > > As

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-15 Thread Theodore Alcapotaxis
> - Original Message - > From: Andrei POPESCU > Sent: 05/15/14 04:50 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package > > > Assumptions: > 1. You did not change the default priority for backports How does one change "

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 14 mai 14, 15:59:08, Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote: > I wrote: > > > > However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major > > upgrades (whether you want them or not) unless you point your sources to > > the next release. > > What happens if I am using Debian current stable

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Theodore Alcapotaxis
What happens if I am using Debian current stable but my linux-image is 3.12 (wheezy-backports)? > - Original Message - > From: Andrei POPESCU > Sent: 05/14/14 05:35 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package > > However

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Curt
On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic wrote: >> >> There is a specific squeeze-lts repository? If so, what should be put in >> /etc/apt/sources.list to benefit from the long term support? >> > > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development > Thank you; I did search* but, contrary to the biblical claim, d

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Wed, 14 May 2014 14:16:37 + (UTC) Curt wrote: > On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > > > > Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 < Pin-Priority < 990. But to > > receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to > > include squeeze-lts repo. > > There is a specific sq

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Curt
On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > > Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 < Pin-Priority < 990. But to > receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to > include squeeze-lts repo. There is a specific squeeze-lts repository? If so, what should be put in /etc/apt/sources.l

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Frank
On 05/14/2014 11:53 AM, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 < Pin-Priority < 990. But to > receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to > include squeeze-lts repo. > Excellent, thanks! Cheers Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Wed, 14 May 2014 11:40:04 +0200 Frank wrote: > On 05/14/2014 11:35 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > APT does not differentiate between "major" or "security" or "whatever" > > upgrade, just about version numbers. > > > > However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major > >

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Frank
On 05/14/2014 11:35 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > APT does not differentiate between "major" or "security" or "whatever" > upgrade, just about version numbers. > > However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major > upgrades (whether you want them or not) unless you point your so

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Wed, 14 May 2014 11:00:30 +0200 Frank wrote: > Hi, > can anybody explain to me what exactly happens if I place a package on > hold? I have an application which unfortunately requires an older php > version. > If I now mark the package "hold" does this mean no major upgrade will be > performed

Re: Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 14 mai 14, 11:00:30, Frank wrote: > Hi, > can anybody explain to me what exactly happens if I place a package on > hold? I have an application which unfortunately requires an older php > version. > If I now mark the package "hold" does this mean no major upgrade will be > performed for this

Security updates for hold package

2014-05-14 Thread Frank
Hi, can anybody explain to me what exactly happens if I place a package on hold? I have an application which unfortunately requires an older php version. If I now mark the package "hold" does this mean no major upgrade will be performed for this package or do I prevent security updates as well, wit