"Kelly Corbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The external network is eth0. As an aside, there is no eth0 device in
> /dev. I see that eth0 is assigned on boot up to the network card I
> have, but there is no device in /dev. Is this normal? I can't recall
> if this how it should be.
That's how
> What's the correlation between Samba and your Ethernet interfaces. Is the
> "inside" network eth0?
The external network is eth0. As an aside, there is no eth0 device in
/dev. I see that eth0 is assigned on boot up to the network card I
have, but there is no device in /dev. Is this normal? I
"Kelly Corbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ; Allow several Samba servers on the same machine
> > > interfaces = eth* 208.46.58.171#/208.46.58.248/255.255.255.0
> > > bind interfaces only = yes
> >
> > That interfaces line doesn't look right. Is it really like that, or just
the
> > messag
> I'm assuming you're using a bridged network configuration under VMware. I
> suspect your interfaces line in smb.conf is the culprit.
>
> > ; Allow several Samba servers on the same machine
> > interfaces = eth* 208.46.58.171#/208.46.58.248/255.255.255.0
> > bind interfaces only = yes
>
> Th
"Kelly Corbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using VMWare (which rocks!)
Agreed! VMware is stunning!
> In my win98 virtual machine, I can see my linux box and the rest of my
> workgroup and all shares work fine, including the shares setup on my
> linux samba server. Other windoze machines
I am using VMWare (which rocks!) to run a Win98 virtual partition in
Debian. The problem I am having is that Samba is not working correctly,
and I think VMWare is the culprit but I can't find what needs to be
changed/removed.
In my win98 virtual machine, I can see my linux box and the rest of my
6 matches
Mail list logo
