Re: Samba Problem

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > > 16.10.2009 7:22, Tom H kirjoitti: >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Jeff Grossman  wrote: >>> >>> I just upgraded by Testing system from Samba 3.3.4-1 to 3.4.2-1 yesterday >>> and now I am not able to connect my Windows Vista mach

Re: Samba Problem

16.10.2009 7:22, Tom H kirjoitti: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote: I just upgraded by Testing system from Samba 3.3.4-1 to 3.4.2-1 yesterday and now I am not able to connect my Windows Vista machine to my Debian machine. I have tried to Google for an answer and have not

Re: Samba Problem

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote: > I just upgraded by Testing system from Samba 3.3.4-1 to 3.4.2-1 yesterday > and now I am not able to connect my Windows Vista machine to my Debian > machine.  I have tried to Google for an answer and have not been able to > find anything.  Di

Samba Problem

I just upgraded by Testing system from Samba 3.3.4-1 to 3.4.2-1 yesterday and now I am not able to connect my Windows Vista machine to my Debian machine. I have tried to Google for an answer and have not been able to find anything. Did something with authentication change between those two ve

Samba Problem

I just upgraded by Testing system from Samba 3.3.4-1 to 3.4.2-1 yesterday and now I am not able to connect my Windows Vista machine to my Debian machine. I have tried to Google for an answer and have not been able to find anything. Did something with authentication change between those two versio

Samba problem

All of a sudden (ie. I can't think of anything that changed.) samba on one linux machine is not working. One symptom is: dgwicks:~# smbclient -L joyce Connection to joyce failed (Error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED) another is: dgwicks:~# mount //joyce/edrv mount error 111 = Connection refu

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 05:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:05:36 -0600 > >Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Fam was started by /etc/init.d/fam on my Sid machine. (I say was >> because it appears my machine is now using avahi, since I did an >> apt-get upgrade the other d

Re: weird fam/samba problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 02:07:04 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:05:36 -0600 > Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fam was started by /etc/init.d/fam on my Sid machine. (I say was > > because it appears my machine is now using

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:05:36 -0600 Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fam was started by /etc/init.d/fam on my Sid machine. (I say was > because it appears my machine is now using avahi, since I did an > apt-get upgrade the other day.) These are unrelated things. Avahi provides "a framework for

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Friday 03 February 2006 12:18, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: [...] >> > >> >Well, I've no clue :(. But I can suggest that you might want to do >> > away with quotas and I've no clue what the idmapd does. Can you >> > get a regular old /etc/exports file to work with >> > nfs-kernel-server? >> >> H

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:57:08 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 03 February 2006 01:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > [...] > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# service nfs restart > >> Shutting down NFS mountd: [FAILED] > >> Shutting down NFS

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Friday 03 February 2006 01:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: [...] >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# service nfs restart >> Shutting down NFS mountd: [FAILED] >> Shutting down NFS daemon: [FAILED] >> Shutting down NFS quotas:

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:59:20 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:35, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500 > > > >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thursday 02 February 2006 23:05, Jacob S wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:06:26 -0500 > >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> >maybe there is a setting in fam.conf that is ty

Re: weird fam/samba problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:06:26 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > >maybe there is a setting in fam.conf that is tying up the shares? > > Maybe, I just found one that w

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:36, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500 > >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500 >> > >> >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:35, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500 > >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500 >> > >> >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500 > > > >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> >Gre

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:51 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500 > > > >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> >Gre

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500 > >Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >Greetings; >> >> And no one has any comments to make on this? > >not a clue. why samba and

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:57:43 -0500 Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote: > >Greetings; > > And no one has any comments to make on this? not a clue. why samba and not nfs? FWIW, I killed fam, and > things seem to be working more or

Re: weird fam/samba problem

On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:39, Gene Heskett wrote: >Greetings; And no one has any comments to make on this? FWIW, I killed fam, and things seem to be working more or less normally here. Killing fam allowed me to umount those shares. This is required because I have a script (cron) that r

weird fam/samba problem

Greetings; I have a machine out in the workshop that I occasionally mount via a samba share. Its a debian variant, hence this posting to both lists. At present, no shells are logged into it, nor any utilities are open to the share known as /mnt/shop-slash on this machine. But if I try to umoun

shorewall and samba problem

Hello all! I'm using Debian 3.1 and shorewall 2.2.3 I installed samba on the same machine where I already have shorewall installed. As I noticed samba is disabled by default in shorewall. So, I followed the instruction in http://www.shorewall.net/samba.htm: 1. Added the lines into /etc/shorewa

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:48:57PM +0100, Randy Orrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Randy Orrison > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > As with most documentation, free

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Randy Orrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Roberto Sanchez wrote: > >Karsten M. Self wrote: > >>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] > >>"LocalProfile"=dword:0001 > >> > >>My only question is this: is this key documented

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

Karsten M. Self wrote: on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Randy Orrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Roberto Sanchez wrote: Karsten M. Self wrote: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "LocalProfile"=dword:0001 My only question is this: is this key documented

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:09:13AM +0100, Randy Orrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Roberto Sanchez wrote: > >Karsten M. Self wrote: > >>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] > >>"LocalProfile"=dword:0001 > >> > >>My only question is this: is this key documented

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

On Sat, 22 May 2004 10:39:34 -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Probably not documented. I doubt MS would want people to know too much > about the registry. It would make migration to competing OSs too easy. > I don't know about registry key, but in Group Policy under Administrative Templates

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

Roberto Sanchez wrote: Karsten M. Self wrote: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "LocalProfile"=dword:0001 My only question is this: is this key documented somewhere, and how would one ordinarially go about getting documentation on a registry key? Probably no

Re: Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

Karsten M. Self wrote: The problem turned out to be a legacy MS Windows Registry key: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "LocalProfile"=dword:0001 Changing that to: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "LocalProfile"=dword:00

Samba problem resolved: roaming profiles wouldn't

It took a few days of beating my head against a wall, but my roaming profiles now roam. Turns out to be more a legacy MS Windows than Samba issue. Situation: - Samba 3.0.x (current Debian testing/unstable). - 10 WinXP Pro clients. - A working Samba server which offers share, domain login

Re: Samba Problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have testing debian with samba and while the linux server is on the > network the other systems on the network lock up and freeze for several > minutes then un freeze. After I remove the debian box from the network it > does not freeze any of the other computers on th

Samba Problem

I have testing debian with samba and while the linux server is on the network the other systems on the network lock up and freeze for several minutes then un freeze. After I remove the debian box from the network it does not freeze any of the other computers on the network. Any help would be

Re: Samba Problem

No, change the share type to USER and make sure that your passdb backend has all the user accounts and passwords for the users you want to authenticate.  I haven't worked with Samba 3.0 yet, but from reading about it I know you don't need machine accounts unless you are trying to use Samba as a PDC

Re: Samba Problem

I believe you will have to either change your share type to "share" or you will have to add the machines you want to grant access into the smbpasswd database.   - Johnny - - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:

Re: Samba Problem

On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 18:50:04 +0200, Manfred Hungerland wrote: > Everytime when a printjob from Windows is started i get > to the job a Page that says > User: *** ( the User ) > Host:*** ( Server ) > Class:*** ( Server ) > Job: sbmprn.*** There's probably a banner-page option in your print spooler

Samba Problem

Hello I hohe this is the Right place. I have a Problem with samba. Everytime when a printjob from Windows is started i get to the job a Page that says User: *** ( the User ) Host:*** ( Server ) Class:*** ( Server ) Job: sbmprn.*** has anyone a Idea how i stop this? Greatings from Switzerland

Re: [Urgent] Samba problem

I can see one very visible problem: In the service definition for webdata, you have guest ok = no but public = yes.  The public setting is just a synonym for guest ok.  Setting these to two different values is not a good idea. Also, I don't know much about using LDAP for Samba, but should security

Re: [Urgent] Samba problem

Thanks for ur reply,Sure! === << smb.conf >> [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP security = share encrypt passwords = yes domain master = yes ldap suffix = "dc=ezmap,dc=com" ldap admin dn =cn=root,dc=ezmap,dc=com ldap port =389 ldap server = localhost ldap ssl = no serve

Re: [Urgent] Samba problem

Sorry, my dumb AOL which I hate so much didn't attach the previous message. Can you show us your smb.conf? Previous message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] follows: * Hello list : i got a odd problem about samba. i have a share folder named "[webdata]" for LDAP authentic user access ON

Re: [Urgent] Samba problem

Can you show us your smb.conf?

[Urgent] Samba problem

Hello list : i got a odd problem about samba. i have a share folder named "[webdata]" for LDAP authentic user access ONLY. However, My windows 2000/XP client can read [webdata] through Netneighbor. when i upload a text file named "ipsec.txt" to [webdata] , My windows2000/XP alert me "Can not

Re: Samba problem

On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:19:55PM -0500, Edward Guldemond wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:45:03PM -0600, Amal Phadke wrote: > > Even after I changed the password in Linux, I still can't map the drive in > > Windows. Everything was working before I upgraded to the above version. Any > > help wi

Re: Samba problem

On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:45:03PM -0600, Amal Phadke wrote: > Even after I changed the password in Linux, I still can't map the drive in > Windows. Everything was working before I upgraded to the above version. Any > help will be appreciated. Did you change the password with passwd or smbpasswd?

Samba problem

Hi all, After I upgraded to the latest Samba 2.999+3.0.alpha20-4 in unstable, I can't map my Linux user account from my Windows 2000 box any more. I checked the Samba logs. The logs show [2002/12/07 12:05:48, 1] auth/auth_sam.c:sam_account_ok(304) Account for user 'johndoe' password expired

Re: samba problem

On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 02:44, Mirek Dobsicek wrote: > yes, login and line in smbpasswd exists ... > when I test it with smbclient localhost, it works fine > > it looks for mistake on windoze side :-( > Can you please attach your "working" (security = share) and your nonworking (security = user) s

Re: samba problem

ct: Re: samba problem > On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 09:14, Mirek Dobsicek wrote: > > Hi, > > on my Woody box I'm running Samba 2.2.2 > > when I set security = share in smb.conf, all Windows desktops around > > can easily find this server a connect. > > If I set

Re: samba problem

On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 09:14, Mirek Dobsicek wrote: > Hi, > on my Woody box I'm running Samba 2.2.2 > when I set security = share in smb.conf, all Windows desktops around > can easily find this server a connect. > If I set security = user (this is my prefered setting) then Windows desktops > cant e

samba problem

Hi, on my Woody box I'm running Samba 2.2.2 when I set security = share in smb.conf, all Windows desktops around can easily find this server a connect. If I set security = user (this is my prefered setting) then Windows desktops cant even neither find this server nor connect. Only when I use nbtst

Re: Samba problem with user level share permissions under Windoze

> "Andrew" == Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> Hi, I'm trying to configure a Windoze 98 PC on my home network Andrew> to use user level share permissions instead of share level Andrew> permissions, and when I go to add users to a particular share, Andrew> Windows barfs: Do y

Samba problem with user level share permissions under Windoze

Hi, I'm trying to configure a Windoze 98 PC on my home network to use user level share permissions instead of share level permissions, and when I go to add users to a particular share, Windows barfs: You cannot view the list of users at this time. Please try again. and I get: [2001/09/03 14:21:

Re: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

> "G" == Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Hubert Palme wrote: >> > "G" == Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> G> I'm not sure if the max log size parameter makes sense when using G> --with-syslog. The parameter should probably be ignore

Re: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Hubert Palme wrote: > > "G" == Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > G> I'm not sure if the max log size parameter makes sense when using > G> --with-syslog. The parameter should probably be ignored if syslog > G> support is enabled (via ./configure and smb.c

Re: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

> "G" == Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> I'm not sure if the max log size parameter makes sense when using G> --with-syslog. The parameter should probably be ignored if syslog G> support is enabled (via ./configure and smb.conf) I use precompiles packages of the Debian dietr

Re: Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Hubert Palme wrote: > Hi, > > in the syslog file I repeatedly find the following messages: > > Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: [2001/06/08 08:19:40, 0] > lib/debug.c:check_log_size(311) > Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: check_log_size: open of debug file > /var/log/smb

Samba: Problem mit check_log_size

Hi, in the syslog file I repeatedly find the following messages: Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: [2001/06/08 08:19:40, 0] lib/debug.c:check_log_size(311) Jun 8 08:19:40 wrpc3 smbd[8296]: check_log_size: open of debug file /var/log/smb failed - using console. The file /var/log/smb has the

Re: Samba Problem

Sorry here is MY smb.conf - ;***section global* [global] encrypt passwords = yes log file = /var/smb.log comment = overid3's File Server :) path = /samba guest ok = yes guest account = nobody workgroup = @home null passwords = True max connections = 10 ;***

Re: Samba Problem

Hey, maybe you could include your smb.conf so that we could have look-see. Cameron Matheson --- Zac Epkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ive been using Debian for a bout a6months and never > seen anything like > this... I went to a lan party and when i ran TkSmb > it would find a user name > M

Samba Problem

Ive been using Debian for a bout a6months and never seen anything like this... I went to a lan party and when i ran TkSmb it would find a user name MICHELLE but could never connect to it, now when i went to a lan party before this there was a user name michelle but i dont see any reason y it wo

RE: Samba problem

>> [2001/02/26 22:26:25, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) >> file_init: Information only: requested 1 open files, 1014 are available. This is common in my log file as well. Is it a problem? Can it be fixed? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your f

Re: Samba problem

Doh! That would probably explain it, then. I didn't think I needed System V IPC - guess I was wrong. :( I'll recompile tonight and see what happens... Thanks for the help. :) Jason > > > [2001/02/26 22:26:28, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(566) > > Can't create or use semaphore [1]

Re: Samba problem

> [2001/02/26 22:26:28, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(566) > Can't create or use semaphore [1]. Error was Function not implemented > [2001/02/26 22:26:28, 0] locking/locking.c:locking_init(174) > ERROR: Failed to initialise share modes looks like you compiled your kernel without System V I

Samba problem

I'm trying to get Samba up and running on my debian box (2.4.2 kernel), but am having a bit of a problem. I've got everything installed and SWAT working properly. The debian box shows up in Network Neighborhood. When I try to connect to the debian box, I get the error: \\boxname not available

win95 postscript printing via samba problem...

I've had this problem for a long time and I'm tired of it. ;-) I've found this bug report: which describes my problem. Basically printing from win95 to my Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 system via samba, using AdobePS 4 software "AdobePSDefaultPostScriptPrint"

samba problem fixed i believe

I dont know what the hell was wrong, but i just upgraded to samba pre 3.0 (from today's CVS) and everything is working great so far.. no more dissapearing files! woohoo. nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://w

Samba problem: can't create a valid tmp service

When I run "smbclient '\\[hostname]\tmp' (following the DIAGNOSIS doc) and enter my password, I get "Invalid network name in tree connect". The smb log reports "couldn't find service tmp", yet the tmp service setup in smb.conf is an exact match of the sample config file, and running testparm on th

Re: Small Samba problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Tim O'Brien wrote: >I'm running Samba on two of my Linux boxes so they can act as fileservers. >For some reason, Linux/Samba seems to be a good bit slower than Windoze95 >on the same machines in terms of file transfers. Any idea what I've do

Small Samba problem

I'm running Samba on two of my Linux boxes so they can act as fileservers. One machine is a 486/66, the other a 486/100, both with 16M. These machines have only two purposes: Samba server (with TCP/IP), and IPmasq with a 28.8 modem. Neither is what I would call heavily loaded (usually no more than