On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:41:52AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:36:09PM +0800, Isaac To wrote:
> > Just be reminded that an apt upgrade is about to start, and aptitude is
> > currently uninstallable in sid.
>
> Hmm, I should get more sleep then, cause I swear I just inst
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:11:36AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Thing is, someone could have updated their glibc package yesterday with no
> problem. After that, the developer updated it, broke something, and then
> you turn around and grab that broken package and then run into major
> problem
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:33:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> The new apt-listbugs package (in experimental) is also handy; it will
> query the BTS for RC bugs in the packages apt is about to
> install/upgrade and warn you about them.
Oooh, when can we look forward to seeing this in sid?
--
.''`
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:36:09PM +0800, Isaac To wrote:
> Just be reminded that an apt upgrade is about to start, and aptitude is
> currently uninstallable in sid.
Hmm, I should get more sleep then, cause I swear I just installed it
last weekend to see if it's any different from when I used it b
Brian Nelson wrote:
> David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I've been following debian-devel and debian-user looking for
> >> problems people have had with upgrading unstable and haven't seen that
> >> many (a few regarding kde / libfam issues).
> >
> > This is probably the best way to f
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 10:56 PM 2/18/2003 -0500, Mark wrote:
>> I installed unstable about a month ago and have had nothing but good
>> times. I've been following debian-devel and debian-user looking for
>> problems people have had with upgrading unstable and haven't seen
David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've been following debian-devel and debian-user looking for
>> problems people have had with upgrading unstable and haven't seen that
>> many (a few regarding kde / libfam issues).
>
> This is probably the best way to find out if something is broken in
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I installed unstable about a month ago and have had nothing but good
> times. ... But, I'm curious to know how safe/dangerous it is to just
> say 'apt-get upgrade' presently.
Presently? Both of my unstable machines work fine (though there is
that observation tha
At 10:56 PM 2/18/2003 -0500, Mark wrote:
I installed unstable about a month ago and have had nothing but good
times. I've been following debian-devel and debian-user looking for
problems people have had with upgrading unstable and haven't seen that
many (a few regarding kde / libfam issues).
> "nate" == nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
nate> sounds like your new to debian.. if this is a new installation I
nate> would reccomend upgrading now. The more experience you have
nate> dealing with a broken system the better. And if you break your
nate> current system in it
Mark said:
> of debian, but this is going to be my first upgrade and don't know how
> much I should blindly trust these things. Should I upgrade now or wait
> for the transition to gcc3.2 to end?
sounds like your new to debian.. if this is a new installation I would
reccomend upgrading now. Th
I installed unstable about a month ago and have had nothing but good
times. I've been following debian-devel and debian-user looking for
problems people have had with upgrading unstable and haven't seen that
many (a few regarding kde / libfam issues). But, I'm curious to know
how safe/dangero
12 matches
Mail list logo
