Thanks for the link to putty. Tried it. It works well. And fits on a
floppy. What I'll do is have it on my web-site so I can download it
anytime.
BTW, http://www.securityportal.com/lasg/file/index.html is a great resource.
Many thanks.
Patrick
>However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want
>a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client.
Nope, try TerraTerm with the SSH plugin. It is free and quite good!
Regards,
Onno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Glen S Mehn) wrote:
>With ssh you have to connect with a secure client, which you can get on
>any unix, and there's a free one for win32, called putty, which is very
>nice. Supports telnet, too.
>
>The problem with telnet is that nayone who wants to sniff your network
>can get ev
> However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want
> a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client.
>
Teraterm is one free windows ssh client (the only one I know of).
--
Paul McHale
Work: 937-253-7610 Double E Solutions
Mobile: 937-371-2828 4912 Effingham
Fax:413-
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:16:56AM +0900,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want
> > a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client.
take a look at http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ - Cygwin (GPL) provides a
unix
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:16:56AM +0900,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want
> a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client.
Nope. See http://www.zip.com.au/~roca/ttssh.html for TTSSH, which allows
TeraTerm Pro (linked to from that page, and also free) to use
a floppy...
Regards,
Glen
> Subject: ssh pam
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 15:29:46 +
> From: Patrick Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi all,
>
> I rarely access my box other than by telnet and I'm
> told that I should use a more
> However, AFAIK, you'll have to hand out some $$ if you want
> a Windoze (95/98/NT) ssh client.
TeraTerm SSH is free, and works prety well.
B
Patrick Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I rarely access my box other than by telnet and I'm
>told that I should use a more secure setup.
>What is the Debian recommended approach? ssh? PAM?
>Are they hard to implement? I often use a different PC
>so I need a slou
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:12:46PM +, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> What is the Debian recommended approach? ssh? PAM?
> Are they hard to implement? I often use a different PC
> so I need a sloution that does not require a secure client.
ssh is very easy, but you need a secure client.
Use
Hi all,
I rarely access my box other than by telnet and I'm
told that I should use a more secure setup.
What is the Debian recommended approach? ssh? PAM?
Are they hard to implement? I often use a different PC
so I need a sloution that does not require a secure client.
Thanks in ad
11 matches
Mail list logo