On Friday 15 January 2016 13:26:09 Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:44:07 -0600
>
> David Wright wrote:
> >On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 20:33:45 (-0700), Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:37:49 -0500 Gene Heskett
wrote:
> >> >On Thursday 14 January 2016 21:04:32 Charlie
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:44:07 -0600
David Wright wrote:
>On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 20:33:45 (-0700), Charlie Kravetz wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:37:49 -0500 Gene Heskett
>> wrote:
>> >On Thursday 14 January 2016 21:04:32 Charlie Kravetz wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:27:19 + Lisi R
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 20:33:45 (-0700), Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:37:49 -0500 Gene Heskett wrote:
> >On Thursday 14 January 2016 21:04:32 Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> >> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:27:19 + Lisi Reisz
> >> wrote:
> >> >On Thursday 14 January 2016 23:49:03 Gene
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:37:49 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Thursday 14 January 2016 21:04:32 Charlie Kravetz wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:27:19 +
>>
>> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> >On Thursday 14 January 2016 23:49:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 17:39:59 Johann K
On Thursday 14 January 2016 22:19:16 dean wrote:
> On 01/15/16 12:37, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> For what its worth, as root, an apt-get update, followed by an
> >> apt-get upgrade reports 0 package to upgrade.
> >>
> >> The answer may be in the above sentence. What does apt-get update,
> >>
On Friday 15 January 2016 02:37:49 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > The answer may be in the above sentence. What does apt-get update,
> > followed by apt-get dist-upgrade show? upgrade on its own does not
> > upgrade all packages. It skips kernel and some other stuff. Perhaps
> > that accounts for the diff
On 01/15/16 12:37, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> For what its worth, as root, an apt-get update, followed by an
>> apt-get upgrade reports 0 package to upgrade.
>>
>> The answer may be in the above sentence. What does apt-get update,
>> followed by apt-get dist-upgrade show? upgrade on its own do
On Thursday 14 January 2016 21:04:32 Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:27:19 +
>
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >On Thursday 14 January 2016 23:49:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 17:39:59 Johann Klammer wrote:
> >> > On 01/14/2016 10:50 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:27:19 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>On Thursday 14 January 2016 23:49:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 17:39:59 Johann Klammer wrote:
>> > On 01/14/2016 10:50 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > > On Thursday 14 January 2016 16:18:08 Johann Klammer wrote:
>>
On Thursday 14 January 2016 23:49:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2016 17:39:59 Johann Klammer wrote:
> > On 01/14/2016 10:50 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Thursday 14 January 2016 16:18:08 Johann Klammer wrote:
> > >> Synaptic runs on your box?
> > >> Years ago, when I tried it,
On Thursday 14 January 2016 21:44:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> From that it would appear aptitude is confused at best, broken at worst.
Neither. It just works differently. They used all to use different databases
to some extent, or anyhow to be unmixable, but they are now mixable.
Why is everything
On Thursday 14 January 2016 17:39:59 Johann Klammer wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 10:50 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 January 2016 16:18:08 Johann Klammer wrote:
> >> Synaptic runs on your box?
> >> Years ago, when I tried it, it would always crash right on
> >> startup use aptitude. It
On 01/14/2016 10:50 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2016 16:18:08 Johann Klammer wrote:
>
>> Synaptic runs on your box?
>> Years ago, when I tried it, it would always crash right on startup
>> use aptitude. It seems a lot more stable...
>
> Back on list where it belongs.
>
>
On Thursday 14 January 2016 16:18:08 Johann Klammer wrote:
> Synaptic runs on your box?
> Years ago, when I tried it, it would always crash right on startup
> use aptitude. It seems a lot more stable...
Back on list where it belongs.
I just ran it, and its obvious it doesn't reference the sa
Synaptic runs on your box?
Years ago, when I tried it, it would always crash right on startup
use aptitude. It seems a lot more stable...
On Thursday 14 January 2016 11:33:10 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:43:53 Johann Klammer wrote:
> > On 01/14/2016 04:00 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Greetings all;
> > >
> > > Intermittently but sometimes several times an hour from the times
> > > recorded. The error portion
On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:43:53 Johann Klammer wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 04:00 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > Intermittently but sometimes several times an hour from the times
> > recorded. The error portion of the logged line:word wrapped
> >
> > segfault at 0 ip b7614966 sp
On 01/14/2016 04:00 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> Intermittently but sometimes several times an hour from the times
> recorded. The error portion of the logged line:word wrapped
>
> segfault at 0 ip b7614966 sp bf9b64c8 error 6 in
> libc-2.13.so[b759b000+15e000
>
> No clue what
Greetings all;
Intermittently but sometimes several times an hour from the times
recorded. The error portion of the logged line:word wrapped
segfault at 0 ip b7614966 sp bf9b64c8 error 6 in
libc-2.13.so[b759b000+15e000
No clue what an error 6 means. No errors shown in the man page, just mild
; >
> > In pursuing an attempt to put dovecot to work as a local server, I
> > find my /var/log/mail.err log is being spammed once for every
> > incoming email.
> >
> > The log looks like this:
> >
> > Dec 3 10:38:34 coyote spamc[6292]: connect to spamd on
/var/log/mail.err log is being spammed once for every incoming
> email.
>
> The log looks like this:
>
> Dec 3 10:38:34 coyote spamc[6292]: connect to spamd on ::1 failed,
> retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
> Dec 3 10:38:35 coyote spamc[6303]: connect to spamd on ::
ind
> my /var/log/mail.err log is being spammed once for every incoming email.
>
> The log looks like this:
>
> Dec 3 10:38:34 coyote spamc[6292]: connect to spamd on ::1 failed,
> retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
> Dec 3 10:38:35 coyote spamc[6303]: connect to sp
Greetings all;
I am using procmail for my MTA which also attempts to run the incoming
stuff thru some filters, like spamc/spamd.
In pursuing an attempt to put dovecot to work as a local server, I find
my /var/log/mail.err log is being spammed once for every incoming email.
The log looks like
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 06:09:56PM -0700, Raquel wrote:
> Why are we getting spammed from this debian.asconix.com??
What? do you mean the StumpWM? I'm interested to know about
it.
cheers,
--
Joel Roth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Why are we getting spammed from this debian.asconix.com??
--
Raquel
http://www.byraquel.com
Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth.
--John F. Kennedy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 08:28, Libre, Alex wrote:
> Before going further how did you get my e-mail address. Do I know you?
> Please identify yourself.
>
> Alex
>
>
Well, dhs.gov is the U.S.A Department of Homeland Security. It's rather
amusing if Alex Libre is an actual pers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 08:56:52AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> I saw some mention of a new reporting mechanism in SA 2.50. However,
> I haven't had time to look into it. That may require some changes to
> how the filter detects tagged spam,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:45:48PM -, Peter Whysall wrote:
> Have you got that URL at hand?
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/index_.html
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`-
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:45:48PM -, Peter Whysall wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:25:48PM -, Paul Johnson wrote:
|
| > Heh, we get enough complaining about your spam 'round
| > Portland in Computer Bits. 8:o)
| >
| > Go hit up dman's website about integrating exim with
| > spamas
On approximately Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:45:48PM -, Peter Whysall wrote:
>
> >
> > Go hit up dman's website about integrating exim with
> > spamassassin, set up a quick procmail rule, and be sure to
> > use the new Bayesian learner. You can then end the
> > multiple-email-address stupidity
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:45:48PM -, Peter Whysall wrote:
> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Go hit up dman's website about integrating exim with spamassassin,
> > set up a quick procmail rule, and be sure to use the new Bayesian
> > learner. You can then end the multiple-e
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 March 2003 12:25
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: debian spammed
> Heh, we get enough complaining about your spam 'round
> Portland in Computer Bits. 8:o)
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:14:38AM -0800, Carla Schroder wrote:
> Oh frabjous day, my debian-users list address is getting spammed. What a
> lovely world we live in.
Heh, we get enough complaining about your spam 'round Portland in
Comput
It's worthy of an auction. Lets put the switch pulling on ebay.
Colin Ellis
Solution City Ltd
http://www.solution-city.com
-Original Message-
From: Carla Schroder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2003 18:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian spammed
Oh frabjous da
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 19:14, Carla Schroder wrote:
> $100 cash reward for the inventor of an infallible spammer brain burner.
> $500 if I get to pull the switch
Quick money that fast This must be spam.
--
Svenn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
At 2003-03-11T18:14:38Z, Carla Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh frabjous day, my debian-users list address is getting spammed. What a
> lovely world we live in.
>
> $100 cash reward for the inventor of an infallible spammer brain burner.
> $500 if I get to pull th
Oh frabjous day, my debian-users list address is getting spammed. What a
lovely world we live in.
$100 cash reward for the inventor of an infallible spammer brain burner.
$500 if I get to pull the switch
--
~
Carla Schroder
www.tuxcomputing.com
this message brought to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 8:44 am, Pat Colbeck wrote:
> Strangley allthough I use my private address for all mailing lists and
> usenet stuff I get far more spam via my work E-mail address that is omly
> used for business related stuff.
>
Me too - I
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:44:30AM +0100, Pat Colbeck wrote:
> Strangley allthough I use my private address for all mailing lists and
> usenet stuff I get far more spam via my work E-mail address that is omly
> used for business related stuff.
Further lowering my ideas of the corporate world.
-
Strangley allthough I use my private address for all mailing lists and
usenet stuff I get far more spam via my work E-mail address that is omly
used for business related stuff.
Pat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Monday 14 October 2002 19:52, Leo Spalteholz wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:39:23 -0400
>
> Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (20-30 per day!). Is this probably just a coincidence, or does
> > debian-user get trolled/web-botted a lot?
>
> No problem here. I've been subscribed for o
Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just started on debian-user this Saturday, then Sunday and today
> I've been getting more spam email than I've ever gotten before (20-30
> per day!). Is this probably just a coincidence, or does debian-user
> get trolled/web-botted a lot? Should I us
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:39:23 -0400
Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (20-30 per day!). Is this probably just a coincidence, or does debian-user
> get trolled/web-botted a lot?
No problem here. I've been subscribed for over a year and have only gotten about 5
items of spam total on th
I just started on debian-user this Saturday, then Sunday and today I've been getting
more spam email than I've ever gotten before
(20-30 per day!). Is this probably just a coincidence, or does debian-user
get trolled/web-botted a lot? Should I use a less favourite email address
for posting
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:25:19 -0500
"Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | You see I'm 31K modem brief connect to ISP POP box. I read this group
> | on google. Sure I've got procmail etc. turned on. But that's only
> | for after one downloads the box contents. One need IMAP t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:30:43AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> I'm scared s*itless about wafting about my real e-mail address on my
> posts here, as I've already seen account after account of mine get
> buried in spam and now all's I got left is my re
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:30:43AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
| I'm scared s*itless about wafting about my real e-mail address on my
| posts here, as I've already seen account after account of mine get
| buried in spam and now all's I got left is my real ISP address-- all
| from posting to "little
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:30:43AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> I'm scared s*itless about wafting about my real e-mail address on my
> posts here, as I've already seen account after account of mine get
> buried in spam and now all's I got left is my real ISP address-- all
> from posting to "little
I'm scared s*itless about wafting about my real e-mail address on my
posts here, as I've already seen account after account of mine get
buried in spam and now all's I got left is my real ISP address-- all
from posting to "little known mailing lists".
Anyways I tremble in my boots each time one of
/* Please excuse the cross-posting to debian-user and smartlist. I
think both are likely to have useful input on this and it feels fairly
urgent to me! */
I run a few not particularly large Email lists using smartlist under
Hamm. I have subscription confirmation on and have been very
happy w
50 matches
Mail list logo
