Re: Spam on the list

2014-04-21 Thread Tom Furie
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:06:00PM -0500, c. marlow wrote: > What the heck > Sorry I'm new to the whole group email / NEWSGROUP thing. It was spam. Sometimes it gets through the filters. Best course of action is to not reply to it, and *never* quote it. Cheers, Tom -- Support your local Se

Do NOT Reply To SPAM On The List

2010-08-11 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
Do not reply to SPAM on the list. It makes it harder for the spam filters to recognize it. If you simply *must* reply, (and no, comedic value no matter how high is not a must) do *NOT* quote said SPAM. That confuses even the content-based filters, since you have two messages with similar

SPAM on the List

2009-06-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
List policy is clear concerning SPAM. Please take a minute to read the Debian mailing list policy -> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ If you'd like to reduce the SPAM you receive via the list, follow the instructions found as part of that policy -> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#ads re

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread KS
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 14:33:08 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote: >>> No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an >>> email client can also "report spam" just as we can do via the

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 14:33:08 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote: > > > > No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an > > email client can also "report spam" just as we can do via the web > > interface manually.

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote: > > No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an > email client can also "report spam" just as we can do via the web > interface manually. If it was possible, my client (and possibly several > others) could have already up

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread KS
Raquel wrote: > On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:35:41 -0400 > KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> The only way I know to report spam is to click the "Report Spam" >>> button on the web interface for list archives. Can that be done >>> via Iceweasel(or other mail clients) interface so that users >>> don't h

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread Raquel
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:35:41 -0400 KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The only way I know to report spam is to click the "Report Spam" > > button on the web interface for list archives. Can that be done > > via Iceweasel(or other mail clients) interface so that users > > don't have to go and f

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 03:35:41PM -0400, KS wrote: > KS wrote: > > Nigel Henry wrote: > >> > >> A serious question. How can the spa--ers post to the list, using any > >> words > >> they like, and yet when I complain to the list using the same words they > >> do, > >> I am blocked from posting

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread Nigel Henry
On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote: > I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list, > and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be > moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing > "spa--ers" to do what they

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread KS
KS wrote: > Nigel Henry wrote: >> On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote: >>> I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list, >>> and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be >>> moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, b

Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread KS
Nigel Henry wrote: > On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote: >> I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list, >> and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be >> moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing >> "

My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected

2007-09-09 Thread Nigel Henry
I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list, and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing "spa--ers" to do what they like. I've had a few drinks, but am especially pi--ed off