Same behavior, snmpd fails to start after 5.7.2.1~dfsg-3 upgrade on a
openvz container running debian sid.
Working fine with 5.7.2~dfsg-8.1+b1
[] Starting SNMP services::pcilib: Cannot open /proc/bus/pci
pcilib: Cannot find any working access method.
I just upgraded a sid box on my network. It is a container running on
openvz. during the upgrade, snmpd fails to upgrade, and I wanted to check
here before I file a bug.
I was running 5.7.2~dfsg-8.1+b1 i386, which was working, however, when I
upgraded to 5.7.2.1~dfsg-3_i386, it broke. Apparently
I have several machines running snmp. Some return the eth interface
stats while some doesnt. Do I have to enable some kind of configurations
to do the same on other machine?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
n crontab every half hour.
VerifySnmpd=`ps -A | grep snmpd`
echo `date '+%x %X'` Start >> /tmp/snmpd.log
if [ -z "$VerifySnmpd" ];then
echo `date '+%x %X'` Starting >> /tmp/snmpd.log
/etc/init.d/snmpd start
i just installed debian etch r1 on P4 box with snmpd configured on v1/v2c
community access , i use prtg to read bandwidth traffic on firewall with 2
eth interfaces on 512kbits connection , the traffic in kbits/s is
incorrectly measured with high numbers starting from 1500 and shutting down
Hi,
I have a problem with snmpd, it only response from localhost, for
example when i execute
snmpwalk -c public -v 1 localhost
It works,
but when I execute
snmpwalk -c public -v 1 192.168.1.5
It does not work, but the snmpd.conf is right.
192.168.1.5 is the ip address of my nic.
There is no
Cliff Flood wrote, on 10/07/05 16:57:
Hi,
I'm running SNMPD (NET-SNMP version: 5.1.2) and using MRTG to graph
traffic throughput on a Sarge box. At the end of August my SNMDP no
longer responds to requests and I get "Timeout: No Response from
localhost" when trying to snmp
Hi,
I'm running SNMPD (NET-SNMP version: 5.1.2) and using MRTG to graph
traffic throughput on a Sarge box. At the end of August my SNMDP no
longer responds to requests and I get "Timeout: No Response from
localhost" when trying to snmpwalk ( snmpwalk -Os -c public -v 1
localh
I'm trying to set up cricket on a machien to monitor variosu machines on my
network. On the Debian machines I've installed the NET SNMP, and NET SNMPD
.debs.
Crickets systemPerfmon.pl returns a small amout of potentialy available
data from the Debian amchines (not nearly all I wou
List,
I have a private MIB for a custom hardware platform that I need to
include in an snmp agent on my Woody Debian/Linux OS. I have been
reading up on using mib2c to create a .h and .c file. Then compiling
this output into the snmpd agent. My goal is to have a local
snmpd_xxx.custom.i386
James Vahn said:
> What misfortune has befallen these previously fine packages?
> Snmpd has become so confusing and hogtied that it no longer performs any
> function at all.. Does anyone know why?
not really, but when was snmp NOT confusing and hogtied ? I've never known
it not t
What misfortune has befallen these previously fine packages?
Snmpd has become so confusing and hogtied that it no longer performs
any function at all.. Does anyone know why?
I ran "snmpconf -g basic_setup" and was greeted with this:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 04:06:23PM -0600, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> Try putting a 2.2.19 kernel on this misbehaving box. If it still eats
> the memory it's probably a config file problem for the system. Are the
> other two machines both running mrtg?
Kernel 2.2.19 didn't fix it. Everything bu
gt; > the memory it's probably a config file problem for the system. Are the
> An snmpd config problem, or something else?
>
> > other two machines both running mrtg?
> They are, all 2.8.9-1.
If mrtg is the only reason you run snmpd, have a look at rrdtool
+ ssh (i.e. set up ssh
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 04:06:23PM -0600, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> Try putting a 2.2.19 kernel on this misbehaving box. If it still eats
Will do, as soon as I get the opportunity. Got one sitting ready to go.
> the memory it's probably a config file problem for the system. Are t
On Sat, 2001-11-10 at 15:09, Quietman wrote:
> I have a strange problem with one of my potato boxes, snmpd sits and
> slowly eats up all the memory.
>
> The box in question has hand-built 2.2.17 kernel, snmpd 4.1.1-2.
>
> Since being started on 27th October it is now using 9
I have a strange problem with one of my potato boxes, snmpd sits and
slowly eats up all the memory.
The box in question has hand-built 2.2.17 kernel, snmpd 4.1.1-2.
Since being started on 27th October it is now using 90596k according to
memstat, this on a 96meg box. I cannot work out what is
Hi all,
i'm a noephite about SNMP and related apps, so i've been playing with
potato snmpd and snmp packages. Default conf files.
doing this
snmpwalk localhost public system
get the snmpd agent down for a feew minutes
other way to hit the bug is
cfgmaker '[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:53:55AM -0400, Felipe Alvarez Harnecker uttered:
>
> doing this
>
> snmpwalk localhost public system
>
> get the snmpd agent down for a feew minutes
>
> other way to hit the bug is
>
> cfgmaker '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' from mrtg
Steve Kowalik writes:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:53:55AM -0400, Felipe Alvarez Harnecker uttered:
> >
> > doing this
> >
> > snmpwalk localhost public system
> >
> > get the snmpd agent down for a feew minutes
> >
> > other way to h
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i have updated my Linux system today (which have 'sid' instaled) only
>getting 5 new packages.
>At the beggining all like to works ok but after finish this one (snmpd was
>one of the upgraded packages) s
Hi there,
i have updated my Linux system today (which have 'sid' instaled) only
getting 5 new packages.
At the beggining all like to works ok but after finish this one (snmpd was
one of the upgraded packages) snmpd (just snmp daemon) have disapired.
How is it?
i havent foun
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 09:40:45AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Yes we can also find the load average at /etc/snmpd/snmpd.conf.
> As you said, we'd like to get the CPU usage in % (1-100%) for user,
> system, idle, as we seen from the 'top' comma
Hi Brian,
Yes we can also find the load average at /etc/snmpd/snmpd.conf.
As you said, we'd like to get the CPU usage in % (1-100%) for user,
system, idle, as we seen from the 'top' command. Is it the per-second
CPU usage you mentioned?
We'd like to use the value in MRTG rep
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 03:41:07PM +0800, Tam, Vincent wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We're using Debian 2.2 system. We've installed the snmpd package
> and configured read access. The problem is we cannot find any place in
> the snmp tree that show the processor load?!
>
&
Hi!
On Tue, 09 Jan 2001 15:41:07 +0800, "Tam, Vincent" writes:
>We're using Debian 2.2 system. We've installed the snmpd package
>and configured read access. The problem is we cannot find any place in
>the snmp tree that show the processor load?!
Are you sure that
Dear all,
We're using Debian 2.2 system. We've installed the snmpd package
and configured read access. The problem is we cannot find any place in
the snmp tree that show the processor load?!
We do an snmpwalk and found that under "host.hrDevice.hrProcessorTable&
I can't get the new snmpd in potato and mrtg (any version) to play nice with
each other.
I can get the correct information (sysDescr sysContact sysName sysLocation
ifNumber sysObjectID) using snmpwalk and snmpget, but
mrtg refuses to work conplaining "error status: noSuchName&qu
I want to monitor other stuff with the snmpd service.. I have a config file
that lists the procs or processes that I want to monitor. But I am lost how
I get mrtg to monitor anything except for ppp0 and eth0 which I have it
currently doing.
Anyone got snmpd.conf files I can look at and also an
On Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 11:38:36AM -0800, Lawrence Walton wrote:
> The combo of snmpd and 2.1.12x and mrtg, is causing a small problem, snmpd
> is not reporting outgoing information on my servers just incoming. Does
> anyone have ideas to why? /proc/net/smnp is giberish to me.
We
The combo of snmpd and 2.1.12x and mrtg, is causing a small problem, snmpd
is not reporting outgoing information on my servers just incoming. Does
anyone have ideas to why? /proc/net/smnp is giberish to me.
On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 08:35:46 +0200, Rainer Clasen wrote:
>Yes. 2.1 counts bytes in /proc/net/dev. But IIRC there are still some
>NIC-drivers which don't supply these numbers. tulip does. I've no clue about
>SNMPD, but I suppose you'll have to teach it to use the byte co
if that will be fixed any time
> soon? 2.1.* maybe?
Yes. 2.1 counts bytes in /proc/net/dev. But IIRC there are still some
NIC-drivers which don't supply these numbers. tulip does. I've no clue about
SNMPD, but I suppose you'll have to teach it to use the byte counters, too.
Rainer
--
KeyID=58341901 fingerprint=A5 57 04 B3 69 88 A1 FB 78 1D B5 64 E0 BF 72 EB
On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 1998 19:48:19 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>
> >Linux doesn't ordinarily have any facility for saying _how much_ data
> >goes through an if. The snmpd's base their throughput figures on
> >_number of packets_, which isn't exactly the same th
On Fri, 23 Oct 1998 19:48:19 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>Linux doesn't ordinarily have any facility for saying _how much_ data
>goes through an if. The snmpd's base their throughput figures on
>_number of packets_, which isn't exactly the same thing. IIRC, you can
>run ip accounting and hack the
Quoting Steve Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've got SNMPD installed on my system so I can monitor, for the moment,
> bandwidth usage on eth0 and ppp0. The problem I'm having is that the
> incoming and outgoing usages do *NOT* show any divergance. If you want to
> see wh
OK, I've installed the CMU SNMPD as well as the UCD SNMPD to verify that
this isn't a problem with the SNMPD daemons and now I'm looking for other
reasons for the following problem.
I've got SNMPD installed on my system so I can monitor, for the moment,
bandwidth us
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 12:03:48PM +0100, Peter Gervai wrote:
> So snmpd. It seems - and some fellow admins reported that they noticed the
> same effetct - that snmpd's ifInOctets and ifOutOctets are incorrect. More
> specifically, they are usually the half of the real values, and i
Hello,
(It's probably not a question of the package and debian, but..)
So snmpd. It seems - and some fellow admins reported that they noticed the
same effetct - that snmpd's ifInOctets and ifOutOctets are incorrect. More
specifically, they are usually the half of the real values, and
39 matches
Mail list logo
