Uwe Dippel wrote:
> This isn't all too helpful, I know. Exim in Debian is a political
> decision; due to licensing. The first thing I always do to any Debian-box
> is installing Postfix.
Um, what? Postfix is DFSG free and included in Debian main.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Uwe,
I find that if I revert to exim4 monolithic configuration, my e-mail
works, and so I've obviously done something to the split configuration
file. I'm subscribing to pkg-exim4-users and will try to resolve the
issue there.
Thanks.
--
Haines Brown, KB1GRM
--
T
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:37:59 -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> $ hostname
> teufel
>
> $ hostname -a
> teufel
Here I have:
$ hostname
wira
$ hostname -a
wira
and fetchmail runs pretty well, including SSL.
Why would the whole fingerprint come up if you didn't use SSL ?
Have you tried telnet, then ?
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:50:01 -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
>
>> There seems to be a problem getting my fetchmail requests being
>> authenticated at the mail server. Here's what fetchmail tells me:
>> ...
>> fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Courier Mail Serv
Uwe writes:
> Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing.
I wrote:
> Not true.
Uwe writes:
> Maybe what I wrote is not true, but when you search the archives, the
> discussion has never ceased, from 1999 onwards. One term you'll find is
> that postfix was not "DFSG-free". (DFSG=Debi
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:23:59 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>> Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing.
>
> Not true.
Maybe what I wrote is not true, but when you search the archives,
the discussion has never ceased, from 1999 onwards. One term
you'll find is that postfix was not "DF
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:50:01 -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> There seems to be a problem getting my fetchmail requests being
> authenticated at the mail server. Here's what fetchmail tells me:
> ...
> fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Courier Mail Server
> fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: localhost
Uwe Dippel writes:
> Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing.
Not true.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the confituration somehow. At first, all downloaded messages were
>> deleted as spam, and as I fiddled, fetchmail could not download messages
>> because the mail server did not like the information it received (SMTP
>> error: 550 Administrative prohibition), and now fetchmail does not
ed as spam, and as I fiddled, fetchmail could not download messages
> because the mail server did not like the information it received (SMTP
> error: 550 Administrative prohibition), and now fetchmail does not even
> see any messages.
This isn't all too helpful, I know. Exim in Debi
mail server did not like the information it received (SMTP
error: 550 Administrative prohibition), and now fetchmail does not even
see any messages.
I'm running debian etch. Doing # exim4 -d did not reveal anything
meaninfful to me. When all mail was rejected as spam, my exim4 reject
log had en
11 matches
Mail list logo
