RE: SMP and potato

2000-09-15 Thread Christian Pernegger
gt; To: Paul McHale > Cc: Debian-User > Subject: Re: SMP and potato > > > > I seem to remember linux not having very robust SMP support. I > had heard it > > was improving. Does anyone know what the state of it is? Is > potato's SMP > > better than sl

Re: SMP and potato

2000-09-15 Thread William T Wilson
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Leonardo Dias wrote: > > was improving. Does anyone know what the state of it is? Is potato's SMP > > better than slink? I would think it is a function of the kernel, not the > > distro, but I could be wrong. > > You are wrong. SMP is totally written in the kernel. But you

Re: SMP and potato

2000-09-15 Thread Leonardo Dias
> I seem to remember linux not having very robust SMP support. I had heard it > was improving. Does anyone know what the state of it is? Is potato's SMP > better than slink? I would think it is a function of the kernel, not the > distro, but I could be wrong. You are wrong. SMP is totally wri

SMP and potato

2000-09-15 Thread Paul McHale
I seem to remember linux not having very robust SMP support. I had heard it was improving. Does anyone know what the state of it is? Is potato's SMP better than slink? I would think it is a function of the kernel, not the distro, but I could be wrong. -- Paul McHale Work: 937-320-5495