On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:49:21PM +0100, Robert Epprecht wrote:
> > yeah, that's the error i was talking about. you can tell because of the
> > typho (should be EEPROM, not EERPROM). do you still get that message?
>
> no
good, maybe it's already fixed in upstream then...
> I could try startin
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:47:51PM +0100, Robert Epprecht wrote:
>> with kernel 2.4.18 dmesg said:
>> sis900.c: v1.08.02 11/30/2001
>> eth0: Error EERPOM read
> yeah, that's the error i was talking about. you can tell because of the
> typho (should
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:47:51PM +0100, Robert Epprecht wrote:
> I am not the guy you talk about, but with kernel 2.4.18 dmesg said:
> sis900.c: v1.08.02 11/30/2001
> eth0: Error EERPOM read
>
> I was told, that the reason was the driver not able to read the mac address
> on the card. I had
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:47:51 +0100
Robert Epprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > do you have anything in your kernel logs that looks like:
> >
> > ... Error EERPOM read ...
> >
> > ? i remember a fellow on another list i'm on had a problem with
> > hi
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> do you have anything in your kernel logs that looks like:
>
> ... Error EERPOM read ...
>
> ? i remember a fellow on another list i'm on had a problem with
> his sis900 card too, it was a bad eeprom that returned bogus values.
I am not the guy you talk a
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:06:06PM +0100, Michael Bona wrote:
> Sorry, I am confused: Detection with DHCP fails - I can confirm that ;-(
> Then what do you do to make the detection "work fine?
do you have anything in your kernel logs that looks like:
... Error EERPOM read ...
? i remember a fel
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:06:06 +0100
Michael Bona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Klaus Imgrund wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:19:09 +0100
> > Michael Bona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Klaus,
> >>
> >> so did you find a pattern under what circumstances it works and
> >when> it does not?
Klaus Imgrund wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:19:09 +0100
> Michael Bona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Klaus,
>>
>> so did you find a pattern under what circumstances it works and when
>> it does not? I would be very interested especially concerning Debian
>> ...
>>
>> Michael
>
> When you
8 matches
Mail list logo