On 12 Jun 2000, Jason Quigley wrote:
> BTW, somebody mentioned problems with disk performance under 2.2.15 and that
> I should stay with 2.2.14.
>
> I am interested in getting LVM working on my system and the only 2.2.x
> system that will be patched will be 2.2.15+.
>
> Does anybody know if this
BTW, somebody mentioned problems with disk performance under 2.2.15 and that
I should stay with 2.2.14.
I am interested in getting LVM working on my system and the only 2.2.x
system that will be patched will be 2.2.15+.
Does anybody know if this person was using the wrong orifice to communicate?
Mark wrote:
> Hmm, ok, but the networks file is stock, set up by the debian install. I
> have upgraded the kernel from 2.0.38 to 2.2.15 - would this be the "route"
> of the problem?
:) Yup.
If I am not entirely mistaken, the 2.2.x kernel doesn't need the route
entry as it sets routes automatical
twork init script, it gives
the
>> error:
>>
>> SIOCADDRT: Invalid Parameters
>>
>> the network script contains:
>>
>> ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
>> route add -net 127.0.0.1 lo
>>
>> It's crashing on the "route add" bit. S
y Popelier
http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas
Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Mark wrote:
> On boot up, when my system executes the network init script, it gives the
> error:
>
> SIOCADDRT: Invalid Parameters
>
> the network script contains:
>
On boot up, when my system executes the network init script, it gives the
error:
SIOCADDRT: Invalid Parameters
the network script contains:
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.1 lo
It's crashing on the "route add" bit. Shouldn't it be "route ad
6 matches
Mail list logo
