Re: SATA disks distinguishable, but missing by-uuid entry.

2009-02-04 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:54:05 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > I suppose that will work for the immediate purpose. But having one > primary ext3 partition present in by-uuid and another missing is, to say > the least, disquieting. > I rebooted, and now all the entries are present in /dev/disks.b

Re: SATA disks distinguishable, but missing by-uuid entry.

2009-02-04 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/04/2009 11:54 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:02:18 +0100, Frederik Kriewitz wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: Fun. Lost of symlinks. Can I use these to identify the drives to be used in RAID pairs or for LLVM? Yes by-uuid seems to miss one of

Re: SATA disks distinguishable, but missing by-uuid entry.

2009-02-04 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:02:18 +0100, Frederik Kriewitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Hendrik Boom > wrote: >> Fun. Lost of symlinks. Can I use these to identify the drives to be >> used in RAID pairs or for LLVM? > > Yes > >> by-uuid seems to miss one of the SATA drives completely, a