Re: Route Table, more info

1999-11-23 Thread Marc Mongeon
Robert: Thanks for the correction, and the RFC pointer. I've got it clearly bookmarked now, so I won't make the same mistake again. Marc -- Marc Mongeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unix Specialist Ban-Koe Systems 9100 W Bloomington Fwy Bloomington, MN 55431-2200 (612)888-0123, x417 | FAX: (612)

Re: Route Table, more info

1999-11-23 Thread Robert Waldner
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:02:43 CST, "Marc Mongeon" writes: >Jason: > >You have nothing else on the ethernet segment that contains the router >internal interface and the debian eth1 interface, right? First, stop >paying for 2 IP addresses that you don't need. Assign "internal" IP >addresses to the r

Re: Route Table, more info

1999-11-23 Thread Marc Mongeon
Jason: You have nothing else on the ethernet segment that contains the router internal interface and the debian eth1 interface, right? First, stop paying for 2 IP addresses that you don't need. Assign "internal" IP addresses to the router internal and debian eth1 interfaces, from one of these IP

Re: Route Table, more info

1999-11-23 Thread Jason
Here is the current route table, (output of netstat -nr) 131.107.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo The reason that it doesn't show the 207.158.140.138 address is because it says tha