On 11/07/2018 09:43 PM, local10 wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to revert firefox-esr upgrade to version 60 in Buster and
install back firefox v 52.9.0?
Thanks
Here:
https://pkgs.org/download/firefox-esr
--
Jimmy Johnson
Slackware64 14.2 - KDE 4.14.32 - AMD A8-7600 - EXT4 at sda9
Registered Linu
On 09/11/2018 03:53, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
But... bank account STILL does not work...
It yelled javascript was not enabled and basically*almost* KICKED me
out IMMEDIATELY because it wasn't available.
Which led to me sitting here thinking... I THOUGHT javascript was
security issue prone to the
On Thursday 08 November 2018 12:37:42 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, November 08, 2018 09:53:24 AM Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> > I got... *sigh*... hacked/cracked two weekends ago. "That other
> > operating system" that has been running as my dialup modem via a
> > networked laptop. Could
On Thursday, November 08, 2018 09:53:24 AM Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> I got... *sigh*... hacked/cracked two weekends ago. "That other
> operating system" that has been running as my dialup modem via a
> networked laptop. Could have come from outside the country, but I'm
> leaning toward +1 more that
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:24:57 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
Hello Dan,
>believe that they are expert users. And as a consequence, they
>don't care one whit about actual security.
Not entirely true; They don't care about *customer* security. Their
own they do. How well (read:poorly) they manage it is
Cindy-Sue Causey:
> But... bank account STILL does not work...
>
> It yelled javascript was not enabled and basically *almost* KICKED me
> out IMMEDIATELY because it wasn't available.
>
> Which led to me sitting here thinking... I THOUGHT javascript was
> security issue prone to the point folks
On 11/8/18, local10 wrote:
> Nov 8, 2018, 4:43 AM by b...@fineby.me.uk:
>
>> I'm no fan of the move to WE myself, despite the security issues
>> claimed(1) to exist with XUL. It's one of the reasons I use Pale Moon.
>>
>
> I was looking into PaleMoon/Basilisk/Waterfox myself but decided not to
> p
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 11:26:11AM +0100, local10 wrote:
I was looking into PaleMoon/Basilisk/Waterfox myself but decided not to proceed
at the time as they are not in the Debian repository.
You're much better off using a third-party-sourced browser than sticking
with an obsolete & unsupporte
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:26:11 +0100 (CET)
local10 wrote:
Hello local10,
>I was looking into PaleMoon/Basilisk/Waterfox myself but decided not to
>proceed at the time as they are not in the Debian repository.
IDK what the position is WRT Waterfox, but I don't think Pale Moon or
Basilisk are likely
Nov 8, 2018, 4:43 AM by b...@fineby.me.uk:
> I'm no fan of the move to WE myself, despite the security issues
> claimed(1) to exist with XUL. It's one of the reasons I use Pale Moon.
>
I was looking into PaleMoon/Basilisk/Waterfox myself but decided not to proceed
at the time as they are not in
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:15:28 +0100 (CET)
local10 wrote:
Hello local10,
>Some plugins disappeared, some no longer work the way they did (meaning
>they now work worse), NoScript freaked me out when I saw what happened
That's because of the change from XUL to WE. Some of your extensions
will have
Nov 8, 2018, 2:55 AM by b...@fineby.me.uk:
> Why? Apart from the move from XUL to WE extensions, going back is
> simply asking for trouble security-wise. Also, more and more sites will
> stop working correctly as v52 gets more out of date.
>
> That said, to wind back, you set up a new repo as pe
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:43:02 +0100 (CET)
local10 wrote:
Hello local10,
>Is there a way to revert firefox-esr upgrade to version 60 in Buster
>and install back firefox v 52.9.0?
Why? Apart from the move from XUL to WE extensions, going back is
simply asking for trouble security-wise. Also, more
Hi,
Is there a way to revert firefox-esr upgrade to version 60 in Buster and
install back firefox v 52.9.0?
Thanks
14 matches
Mail list logo
