On 3/24/2014 10:03 PM, John W. Foster wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 21:52 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 3/24/2014 9:31 PM, John W. Foster wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 14:30 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 3/24/2014 12:45 PM, John Foster wrote:
I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my we
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 21:52 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 3/24/2014 9:31 PM, John W. Foster wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 14:30 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> >> On 3/24/2014 12:45 PM, John Foster wrote:
> >>> I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my web server but was not
> >>> able t
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 21:55 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> 127.0.0.1localhost
Yes I have that in /etc/hosts
thanks
john
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.deb
On 3/24/2014 9:31 PM, John W. Foster wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 14:30 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 3/24/2014 12:45 PM, John Foster wrote:
I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my web server but was not
able to get it properly configured. I kept getting an error message
saying that lo
On 3/24/2014 9:31 PM, John W. Foster wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 14:30 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 3/24/2014 12:45 PM, John Foster wrote:
I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my web server but was not
able to get it properly configured. I kept getting an error message
saying that lo
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 14:30 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 3/24/2014 12:45 PM, John Foster wrote:
> > I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my web server but was not
> > able to get it properly configured. I kept getting an error message
> > saying that localhost was not configured proper
Jonathan Dowland grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:13:53PM -0700, David Guntner wrote:
>> "Easier to configure?" Sorry to sound like Ralph in Troll Mode, but it
>> sounds like it was anything *but* that. :D
>
> OP didn't get it working with lighttpd, and now hasn't got it
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:13:53PM -0700, David Guntner wrote:
> "Easier to configure?" Sorry to sound like Ralph in Troll Mode, but it
> sounds like it was anything *but* that. :D
OP didn't get it working with lighttpd, and now hasn't got it working
with apache2 either. I wouldn't judge lighttpd
Glenn English grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2014, at 10:45 AM, John Foster
> wrote:
>
>> I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my web server but was
>> not able to get it properly configured.
> [...]
> After 3 days of Lighttpd, I too went back to Apache2. I had it
> running
On 3/24/2014 12:45 PM, John Foster wrote:
I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my web server but was not
able to get it properly configured. I kept getting an error message
saying that localhost was not configured properly and I could not use
the simple browser url "http://localhost to o
On Mar 24, 2014, at 10:45 AM, John Foster wrote:
> I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my web server but was not
> able to get it properly configured.
Nor was I, an SSL newbie. I made the mistake of wanting to offer encryption and
a new web server at the same time. I claim that Lightt
I have been trying to get lighttpd to run as my web server but was not
able to get it properly configured. I kept getting an error message
saying that localhost was not configured properly and I could not use
the simple browser url "http://localhost to open the server. I decided
to reinstall apach
12 matches
Mail list logo
