Re: Restrict user to specific window-manage

2003-05-27 Thread David Fokkema
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:21:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi! > > Thus spoke David Fokkema: > > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:13:15PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > But a good system is safe enough to be handed over to guests, isn't it? > > Yes, it should be safe enough. But is

Re: Restrict user to specific window-manage

2003-05-27 Thread thomas . wallrafen
Hi! Thus spoke David Fokkema: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:13:15PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But a good system is safe enough to be handed over to guests, isn't it? Yes, it should be safe enough. But is it a mistake to add one or another layer of security (i.e. chroot...)? To my mind

Re: Restrict user to specific window-manage

2003-05-27 Thread David Fokkema
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:59:29PM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote: > * David Fokkema > > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:38:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi all! > >> > >> Is there any possibility to restict a specific user > >> to a predefined windowmanager? > >> I've got several users here and

Re: Restrict user to specific window-manage

2003-05-27 Thread David Fokkema
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:13:15PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi David! > > Thus spoke David Fokkema: > > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:38:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Just curious, sorry... > > > > Why would you want to do that? > > I've got some computers that are used by both

Re: Restrict user to specific window-manage

2003-05-27 Thread thomas . wallrafen
Hi David! Thus spoke David Fokkema: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:38:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just curious, sorry... > > Why would you want to do that? I've got some computers that are used by both trusted and untrusted users (guests). Because of this I'm planning to set up a chroo