Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Interesting... I tried increasing the size of a LV on which a virtual
> machine KVM is executed. Then with the operating system running, I
> umount (although I have understood that it is not necessary) the
> filesystem /space of the VM and I extended it so that it occupied
On Monday, 30 March 2009 22:20:03 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Interesting... I tried increasing the size of a LV on which a virtual
> machine KVM is executed. Then with the operating system running, I
> umount (although I have understood that it is not necessary) the
> filesystem /space of the
Hi Tapani.
On Sunday, 29 March 2009 18:33:43 +0300,
Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > In the procedure that you mentioned, when erasing and creating the
> > larger partition the data that it maintainded will be lost
>
> No it won't. The contents of the partition will stay in place,
> fdisk only change
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:12:03PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro
(daniel-lis...@gmx.net) wrote:
> In the end you ended up being convincing to me and I was decided to
> create a new physical volume that soon I added to volume group due to
> its rapidity and facility
Good.
> In the procedure that you men
On Saturday, 28 March 2009 19:10:59 +0200,
Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > But I would like, to be possible, not to have to be creating
> > partitions by each disk that could be adding.
>
> Well, it is possible, just hard compared to creating
> new partitions. Extra partitions don't really cost anyth
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Mmmm... I had not thought about that alternative. But I would like, to
> be possible, not to have to be creating partitions by each disk that
> could be adding.
If your array grows so big you'll need GPT partitioning table, you will
not be able to resize the partition at th
> Then I tried to resize with parted of systemrescuecd [1] the LVM
> partition to having more space to extend the logical volumes, but when I
> trying to do it I obtain a message saying that partitions LVM are not
> supported yet. How I can to extend a LVM partition?
I'd suggest to report a bug ag
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:08:43PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro
(daniel-lis...@gmx.net) wrote:
> But I would like, to be possible, not to have to be creating
> partitions by each disk that could be adding.
Well, it is possible, just hard compared to creating
new partitions. Extra partitions don't reall
On 2009-03-28 10:08, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
On Saturday, 28 March 2009 06:40:03 +0200,
Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
How I can to extend a LVM partition?
Why do you want to do that?
I've always thought it one of LVM's main attractions that it
it makes partition resizing almost totally unnecessary.
On Saturday, 28 March 2009 06:40:03 +0200,
Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > How I can to extend a LVM partition?
> Why do you want to do that?
>
> I've always thought it one of LVM's main attractions that it
> it makes partition resizing almost totally unnecessary.
>
> Instead, just create another
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:01:18AM -0300, Daniel Bareiro
(daniel-lis...@gmx.net) wrote:
> How I can to extend a LVM partition?
Why do you want to do that?
I've always thought it one of LVM's main attractions that it
it makes partition resizing almost totally unnecessary.
Instead, just create a
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 00:01 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have a hardware RAID with a logical drive that I expanded adding a
> disk being of the following way:
>
> Name Part TypeFS TypeSize (MB)
> ---
Hi all!
I have a hardware RAID with a logical drive that I expanded adding a
disk being of the following way:
Name Part TypeFS TypeSize (MB)
--
c0d0p1 Primary Linux swap / Solaris 1003,4
13 matches
Mail list logo
