Hello,
It seems my previous email below did not made it to the debian-user ml.
Maybe it is because of the attachments.
I have lost a few hours today googling for the errors without finding
interesting ressource.
In particular, I searched for the error :
(EE) Failed to load module "nv" (module do
On 2017-11-12, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Well, find behavior and hidden files was not the intended topic of this
> thread ;)
> I do already know about Ctrl+H, ls -a, etc.
> And indeed my find command is incorrect since I forgot the dot or some
> wildcard at the beginning.
> After corre
I'll have another go. This is getting tedious.
: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said: 550
5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Mail
appeared to be SPAM or forged. Ask your Mail/DNS-Administrator to correct
HELO and DNS MX settings or to get removed from DNSBLs; please relay via
Hello,
Well, find behavior and hidden files was not the intended topic of this
thread ;)
I do already know about Ctrl+H, ls -a, etc.
And indeed my find command is incorrect since I forgot the dot or some
wildcard at the beginning.
After correction, I can say there is no .xsession-errors file on my
On 2017-11-12, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> On 11/12/17, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
>> deloptes wrote:
>>> I don't use Gnome, because gtk with the concept behind caused a lot of
>>> trouble long time ago and could not convince me that it will ever get
>>> better so I can't help much. But ... there shoul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:26:40PM -0500, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
[...]
> Does "find" find hidden files without being specifically told how to
> do so? The other thing is that maybe you've just been phenomenally
> blessed to have no errors. That *cou
On 11/12/17, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
> deloptes wrote:
>> I don't use Gnome, because gtk with the concept behind caused a lot of
>> trouble long time ago and could not convince me that it will ever get
>> better so I can't help much. But ... there should be logging facility and
>> you need perhaps
Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
> I think this is a very bad advice.
No it is a wise advise. When you make a change and if you want to be sure it
works - make it on a test system. Otherwise you see what happens!
> You should always be uptodate with security updates since there is
> plenty of people ready
Hello,
Thanks for your feedback.
Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
>> >> My install is up-to-date with latest security updates (that's the
>> >> first thing I do anytime I start my laptop).
deloptes wrote:
> There is a rule: "never touch a running system" which means if something
> works let it work. throu
Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
>> >> My install is up-to-date with latest security updates (that's the
>> >> first thing I do anytime I start my laptop).
There is a rule: "never touch a running system" which means if something
works let it work. through your process you are exposed to bugs without a
way
2017-11-09 20:03 GMT+01:00 Laurent Lyaudet :
> >On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:19:11PM +0100, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I found a reproducible bug in latest stable Debian on my laptop.
> >>My install is up-to-date with
>On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:19:11PM +0100, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>I found a reproducible bug in latest stable Debian on my laptop.
>>My install is up-to-date with latest security updates (that's the first
>>thing I do anytime I s
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:19:11PM +0100, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I found a reproducible bug in latest stable Debian on my laptop.
>My install is up-to-date with latest security updates (that's the first
>thing I do anytime I start my laptop).
Hello,
I found a reproducible bug in latest stable Debian on my laptop.
My install is up-to-date with latest security updates (that's the first
thing I do anytime I start my laptop).
I'm using Gnome.
Steps to reproduce on my laptop:
- activate the wifi with upper right scree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I seem to recall someone was talking about how `capt' would randomly die on
>them with signal 11. I have found a 100% reproducible case. Whenever I run
>`capt' in an xterm under the `icewm' window manager (perhaps under others
>too), and I either Maximize or Restore the
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:50:56PM -0500, Maciej Kalisiak wrote:
> I seem to recall someone was talking about how `capt' would randomly die on
> them with signal 11. I have found a 100% reproducible case. Whenever I run
> `capt' in an xterm under the `icewm' window manager (perhaps under others
>
I seem to recall someone was talking about how `capt' would randomly die on
them with signal 11. I have found a 100% reproducible case. Whenever I run
`capt' in an xterm under the `icewm' window manager (perhaps under others
too), and I either Maximize or Restore the xterm, `capt' dies with:
kha
17 matches
Mail list logo
