Re: Reporting list spam

2011-02-20 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20110220003313.GA5116@gennes.augarten>, David Jardine wrote: >I recently bounced a foolish user's reply to a spam message to >report-lists...@lists.debian.org, but then began to wonder whether >I wasn't being just as foolish myself. > >Did my action achieve anything or just make matters worse?

Reporting list spam

2011-02-19 Thread David Jardine
I recently bounced a foolish user's reply to a spam message to report-lists...@lists.debian.org, but then began to wonder whether I wasn't being just as foolish myself. Did my action achieve anything or just make matters worse? Cheers, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@li

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. (reporting list spam)

2006-10-06 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-10-04 17:46:15, schrieb Andrei Popescu: > > Collecting 500 € from each Spamer which is in Europe juridical legal. > > Wow, if you succeed, I want to do that too $$ (can't find the Euro > symbol) :) I hope it works, since some german politics want to take stronger action agains spamers T

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. (reporting list spam)

2006-10-04 Thread Andrei Popescu
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I a live in France, all of my "Anzeigen" (do not know the english I think in this context it would be a combination of 'claim' and 'report'. I don't know if English has an equivalent. > term) are going directly to the Amtsgerich Schöneberg Berl

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. (reporting list spam)

2006-10-04 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-09-29 00:33:12, schrieb Seth Goodman: > My point was that this law, sadly, establishes the principle that > spamming is legal, as long as you abide by the rules. There is no > requirement to opt in and they can spam you until you opt out. I > believe you are right that most spam violates

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. (reporting list spam)

2006-10-04 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-09-28 20:47:32, schrieb David E. Fox: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:47:39 -0500 > "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Spamming activities that are now illegal in the U.S.: sending UBE to > > electronically harvested addresses, forging headers, deceptive subject > > 99% of the s

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. (reporting list spam)

2006-10-04 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-09-26 15:46:08, schrieb Mumia W..: > Is it a good idea to report spam to the mailing list to the respective > ISPs? The spam was not sent to me personally; however, it *is* spam; it > made it into my mailbox, and the mail-list debian-user didn't "opt-in." ;-) > > Should I attempt to rep

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER. (reporting list spam)

2006-09-29 Thread David E. Fox
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:33:12 -0500 "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My point was that this law, sadly, establishes the principle that > spamming is legal, as long as you abide by the rules. There is no In a way, yes. But it also can be viewed as "these types of spam are wrong". Drin

RE: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER. (reporting list spam)

2006-09-28 Thread Seth Goodman
On Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:48 PM -0500, David E. Fox wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:47:39 -0500 > "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Spamming activities that are now illegal in the U.S.: sending > > UBE to electronically harvested addresses, forging headers, > > deceptive

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER. (reporting list spam)

2006-09-28 Thread David E. Fox
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:47:39 -0500 "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Spamming activities that are now illegal in the U.S.: sending UBE to > electronically harvested addresses, forging headers, deceptive subject 99% of the spam (at least) violates one or more of those restrictions. >

RE: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER. (reporting list spam)

2006-09-28 Thread Seth Goodman
On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:33 AM -0500, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > Sending spam is illegal in many countries including > the EU and the US, so the people responsible for servers in these > countries are legally obliged to take action, if they are notified. That's not true for the U.S.

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER. (reporting list spam)

2006-09-27 Thread Andrew Vaughan
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 18:32, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > Mumia W.. wrote: > > Is it a good idea to report spam to the mailing list to the respective > > ISPs? The spam was not sent to me personally; however, it *is* spam; it > > made it into my mailbox, and the mail-list debian-user didn'

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER. (reporting list spam)

2006-09-27 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
Mumia W.. wrote: Is it a good idea to report spam to the mailing list to the respective ISPs? The spam was not sent to me personally; however, it *is* spam; it made it into my mailbox, and the mail-list debian-user didn't "opt-in." ;-) Should I attempt to report things like this? Probably, y

Re: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER. (reporting list spam)

2006-09-26 Thread Mumia W..
On 09/26/2006 01:29 PM, CHEAP OFFER wrote: MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER. PRICE LIST. Nokia N93...$310 USD Nokia 8800..$200 USD [...] Is it a good idea to report spam to the mailing list to the respective ISPs? The spam was not sent t