Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-19 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Lukas Ruf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030217 23:16]: > Is there any way to get rid of package dependencies? The reason for > this question: I have been using VIM ever since I am using Linux -- > and do not want to have emacs installed at all. However, packets like > cxref have the idea they would depe

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-19 Thread Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar
-> > > > This morning (CET) I run an update and performed an upgrade by -> > > > dselect with sid. Ther, emacs was required. -> > > -> > > Don't worry your not going insane, the version of cxref you were trying to -> > > install depends on emacsen-common. -> > > -> > -> > well, why does cxref d

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:09:46PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 14:03]: > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > > thanks. "bug" submitted. Cool (although actually you sent a followup to an existing bug). Try to avoid doing "Subject: Depends: libc6

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Lukas Ruf
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 14:03]: > > > - "filing a bug" -- how? bugreport > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > thanks. "bug" submitted. wbr, Lukas -- Lukas Ruf http://www.lpr.ch Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on http://www.rawip.org

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:04:30PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 13:00]: > > Oh, I seem to be one version behind. See #180876. You might want to > > consider filing a bug; if all else fails the .el stuff may have to be > > split into a separate package. It

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Lukas Ruf
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 13:00]: > > Oh, I seem to be one version behind. See #180876. You might want to > consider filing a bug; if all else fails the .el stuff may have to be > split into a separate package. It would be nice if it could use emacs > only if it's already inst

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:18:58PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 11:57]: > > Now, actually the changelog is not all that verbose here, but the gist > > of it appears to be that cxref contains .el files which need the > > framework in emacsen-common to be i

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Lukas Ruf
Colin, * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 11:57]: > > Now, actually the changelog is not all that verbose here, but the gist > of it appears to be that cxref contains .el files which need the > framework in emacsen-common to be installed correctly. emacsen-common > consumes a whole 78

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:38:29AM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: > * Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 09:30]: > > Don't worry your not going insane, the version of cxref you were trying to > > install depends on emacsen-common. > > well, why does cxref depend on emacsen-common? Is there an

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Nick Hastings
Hi again, * Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030218 17:52]: > Hello Nick, > > * Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 09:30]: > > > > > > > > This morning (CET) I run an update and performed an upgrade by > > > dselect with sid. Ther, emacs was required. > > > > Don't worry your not goi

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Lukas Ruf
Hello Nick, * Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 09:30]: > > > > > This morning (CET) I run an update and performed an upgrade by > > dselect with sid. Ther, emacs was required. > > Don't worry your not going insane, the version of cxref you were trying to > install depends on emacs

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-18 Thread Nick Hastings
Hi, * Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030218 16:52]: > > * nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 08:31]: > > Lukas Ruf said: > > > Is there any way to get rid of package dependencies? The reason for this > > > question: I have been using VIM ever since I am using Linux -- and do not > > > want t

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-17 Thread Lukas Ruf
* nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 08:31]: > Lukas Ruf said: > > Is there any way to get rid of package dependencies? The reason for this > > question: I have been using VIM ever since I am using Linux -- and do not > > want to have emacs installed at all. However, packets like cxref have th

Re: Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-17 Thread nate
Lukas Ruf said: > Is there any way to get rid of package dependencies? The reason for this > question: I have been using VIM ever since I am using Linux -- and do not > want to have emacs installed at all. However, packets like cxref have the > idea they would depend on emacs -- but cxref, as an

Removing Package Dependencies

2003-02-17 Thread Lukas Ruf
Is there any way to get rid of package dependencies? The reason for this question: I have been using VIM ever since I am using Linux -- and do not want to have emacs installed at all. However, packets like cxref have the idea they would depend on emacs -- but cxref, as an example, can be used wit