On 12/05/15 17:34, Mis Ntmurth wrote:
> Ok thanks
> I will contact debian
They don't participate in Internet censorship either.
--
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)
I haven't lost my mind...
...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
On 15 May 2015, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 at 07:35 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> >> Since we're well off-topic already, I can't resist citing a rather
> >> similar and increasingly prevalent negative usage that ma
On 05/12/2015 10:34 AM, Mis Ntmurth wrote:
Ok thanks
I will contact debian
regards
You're also good to contact
GMAne
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/385152/match=problem+installing+gplflash
Marc Info:
http://marc.info/?l=debian-user&m=127780632904466
Google:
https://groups.goo
On 05/15/2015 at 07:35 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>> Since we're well off-topic already, I can't resist citing a rather
>> similar and increasingly prevalent negative usage that makes no
>> sense. I quite often read the phrase:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 11 May 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> > I hear that a _lot_. But I am hearing it more and more in cases
> > like this above where only the negative makes sense. When it is written,
> > some are, I am sure, typos.
On 11 May 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
[snip]
> I hear that a _lot_. But I am hearing it more and more in cases
> like this above where only the negative makes sense. When it is written,
> some are, I am sure, typos. But I am equally sure that soemtimes when I
> understand the positive the ne
Ok thanks
I will contact debian
regards
2015-05-11 22:45 GMT+02:00 Jochen Spieker :
> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
>
> Mis Ntmurth:
> >
> > Can you please remove the page where my name appears, at this page,
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/06/msg02062.html
> > t
On Monday 11 May 2015 22:30:13 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> >> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
> >
> > This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take it to mean
>
John Hasler:
> Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
>
> Lisi Reisz writes:
>> This is a modern usage that I find very confusing.
>
> I assume that it is a mistake and that Jochen intended to write "Cc'ed
> to OP since I not am sure (s)he is subscribed"
Yes,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
>
> This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take it to mean what I
> would phrase "Cc'ed to OP since I am NOT sure (s)he is s
Jochen Spieker wrote:
> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
Lisi Reisz writes:
> This is a modern usage that I find very confusing.
I assume that it is a mistake and that Jochen intended to write "Cc'ed
to OP since I not am sure (s)he is subscribed"
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.
On Monday 11 May 2015 21:45:33 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> [Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
This is a modern usage that I find very confusing. I take it to mean what I
would phrase "Cc'ed to OP since I am NOT sure (s)he is subscribed", ( or "am
sure (s)he is NOT subscribed") since
[Cc'ed to OP since I am sure (s)he is subscribed]
Mis Ntmurth:
>
> Can you please remove the page where my name appears, at this page,
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/06/msg02062.html
> this subject is very old and have no answer and no interest now.
It appears you do not really under
Hello,
Can you please remove the page where my name appears, at this page,
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/06/msg02062.html
this subject is very old and have no answer and no interest now.
Good regards
14 matches
Mail list logo
