[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am so happy to read your mail and interested in this topic. What about JFS?
>Do you have any comment?
Unfortunately, I've not yet tried IBM's JFS on my machines nor had any
experience
using machines that employ JFS. So I can't comment on it.
Paolo Falcone
___
> My additional observations on the following journalling filesystems
> ext3, ReiserFS, XFS, as I use them at home as well as at the office...
> (at home, I have a mixed scheme of filesystems employed in partitions)
Thank you for sharing your observations.
I'm now trying woody with root fs on re
>
> 1) Normally I know what I mean, and I'm trying to express myself
>(though English isn't my native language as it isn't yours) ...
Point taken, I should have been more generous in my interpretation.
> So, as you noted this is not a kind of fs-flamewar, because I want a
> fs's existence
> "Emil" == Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Emil> MH wrote:
>> > "Craig" == Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
Craig> But quite stable at this point. I've been running ext3 on
Craig> all my fs's for several months, and have never seen a
MH wrote:
>
> > "Craig" == Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Craig> But quite stable at this point. I've been running ext3 on
> Craig> all my fs's for several months, and have never seen a
> Craig> problem that resulted from ext3 itself.
>
>
> *My* experience
>
>
hello:
No filesystem is perfect, as each filesystem has its own advantages and
disadvantages. it's up to the user to select his filesystem of choice based
on the environment which he is to use the filesystem.
My additional observations on the following journalling filesystems
ext3, ReiserFS, XFS,
> > That having been said, I think most people would agree that
> > ReiserFS is mature enough for almost any use at this point,
> > and I'm not aware of any glaring problems with it.
>
> Aside from, say, the lack of good repair tools. Or do they
> have one now? That really works?
That I can't a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Craig> But quite stable at this point. I've been running ext3 on
> Craig> all my fs's for several months, and have never seen a
> Craig> problem that resulted from ext3 itself.
>
>
> *My* experience
>
> Ext3 nearly toasted my ide-hd and "tidied up" abou
> "Craig" == Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Craig> But quite stable at this point. I've been running ext3 on
Craig> all my fs's for several months, and have never seen a
Craig> problem that resulted from ext3 itself.
*My* experience
Ext3 nearly toasted my ide-
begin Jeff Bonner quotation:
> First, the usual caveat: ReiserFS is an "experimental" kernel feature
> and as such, you should observe all the normal cautions if this is a
> critical production environment. Also, there is no dump and restore
> with Reiser, but then again neither does the 2.4 k
> And does anyone have any reason why I should not run reiserfs
> on the partion where the database will be stored?
First, the usual caveat: ReiserFS is an "experimental" kernel feature
and as such, you should observe all the normal cautions if this is a
critical production environment. Also, t
11 matches
Mail list logo
