On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:12:44PM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> > and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> >
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:48:46PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:41:52PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > But you don't get the digest version, do you?
>
> Nope. Never saw the point, since it's easier to deal with each
> message individually.
True, so I burst the digests and re
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> missing the References: headers from the messages contained in them. The
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:41:52PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> But you don't get the digest version, do you?
Nope. Never saw the point, since it's easier to deal with each
message individually.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:41:56PM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> > and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> >
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:44:32PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 06:30:11PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Thanks for the correction... but the In-Reply-To: headers have gone missing
> > too, from the same date. Before Nov 21, bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 06:30:11PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Thanks for the correction... but the In-Reply-To: headers have gone missing
> too, from the same date. Before Nov 21, both sets of headers were present in
> the digest messages; after then, neit
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> missing the References: headers from the messages contained in them. The
>
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 07:26:19PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> > and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> > missing the R
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 07:26:19PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> > and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> > missing the R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:10PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
> and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
> missing the References: headers from
Hi,
Just catching up with several weeks' worth of list traffic (or trying to :-) )
and it seems that all the debian-user-digests dated after November 21 are
missing the References: headers from the messages contained in them. The
result is that when I burst the digests and view the result in mutt
12 matches
Mail list logo
