On Sat, 22 May 2010 03:13:06 -0400 (EDT), Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sat,22.May.10, 00:55:34, David Jardine wrote:
>> Stephen Powell wrote:
>>>
>>> I see. All comments. Which is about the same as not having one. Hmm.
>>
>> Or is it? I'm as baffled as anyone alse by xorg configuration, but
>>
On Sat,22.May.10, 00:55:34, David Jardine wrote:
> >
> > I see. All comments. Which is about the same as not having one. Hmm.
>
> Or is it? I'm as baffled as anyone alse by xorg configuration, but
> can't such a file, blank though it be, override some other config file?
> Just a thought.
It
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:29:18PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:32:01 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
> > Stephen Powell wrote:
> >> Please post your /etc/X11/xorg.conf file as well.
> >
> > It contains only commented lines from previous
> > experiments. Hasn't change
On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:32:01 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Please post your /etc/X11/xorg.conf file as well.
>
> It contains only commented lines from previous
> experiments. Hasn't changed since the log was
> recorded. Should be visible here.
>
> http:
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:32:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stephen Powell
> Please post your /etc/X11/xorg.conf file as well.
It contains only commented lines from previous
experiments. Hasn't changed since the log was
recorded. Should be visible here.
http://carnot.pathology.ubc.ca/dalto
On Tue, 18 May 2010 20:24:47 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> ... my employer has [carnot.yi.org] blocked as a "dating" site. ?!
>
> yi.org provides an server for dynamically updated
> addresses. Among the thousands of clients, a few
> could be distributing "colorf
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stephen Powell
> ... my employer has [carnot.yi.org] blocked as a "dating" site. ?!
yi.org provides an server for dynamically updated
addresses. Among the thousands of clients, a few
could be distributing "colorful" data.
http://carnot.pa
On Sun, 16 May 2010 14:13:58 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Your kernel installation environment is not configured correctly for
>> use with lilo. That's why you are having trouble upgrading to
>> a newer kernel. Assuming that you are using only stock kernel images,
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 11:05:21 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote,
> Your kernel installation environment is not configured correctly for
> use with lilo. That's why you are having trouble upgrading to
> a newer kernel. Assuming that you are using only stock kernel images,
> here is what you sh
On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:29:39 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> ...
>> "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"
>> ...
>> I don't understand what problem you are trying to solve.
>
> But it is broke!
> In one sense, the primary problem is failure of X.
>
> dalton:/home/peter
From: Stephen Powell
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 09:29:33 -0400 (EDT)
> ...
> "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"
> ...
> I don't understand what problem you are trying to solve.
But it is broke!
In one sense, the primary problem is failure of X.
dalton:/home/peter# uname -rv
2.6.30-2-686 #1 SMP
On Mon, 10 May 2010 17:42:25 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> What was the problem? In the text you quoted, there was no reasonable
>> change
>> that could be made to grub-pc to address the issue;
>
> Covered in several messages beginning here in debian-user
> What was the problem? In the text you quoted, there was no reasonable change
> that could be made to grub-pc to address the issue;
Covered in several messages beginning here in debian-user.
* Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:04:19 -0700
* Message-id: <171056446.61715.570...@cantor.invali
On Monday 10 May 2010 15:57:02 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> > [update-grub] is not a bug. The maintainer script for the
> > new kernel image package is trying to run update-grub because it is
> > being told to do so by entries in /etc/kernel-img.conf.
>
> Past experience is that an intended straigh
Stephen,
> [update-grub] is not a bug. The maintainer script for the
> new kernel image package is trying to run update-grub because it is
> being told to do so by entries in /etc/kernel-img.conf.
> ...
* Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:46:40 -0400 (EDT)
* Subject: Re: why does linux imag
15 matches
Mail list logo
